Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
CMOS pixel sensors & PLUME operation principles
J. Baudot for the IPHC-PICSEL group IN2P3-KEK Belle II and BEAST meeting Strasbourg, January 2015 CMOS pixel sensors Counting rate Radiation tolerance PLUME ladder
2
CMOS pixel sensors @ IPHC
Motivations ILC vertex detector no trigger ➙ continuous integration performance driven high granularity low material budget The “dimensional curse” Granularity against read-out speed data throughput Potential solution get out only the relevant information In space & time Power dissipation against Material budget also shared by Heavy Ion Colliders Single point res. Integra. time TID Fluence neq/cm2 Temp. STAR - PXL ~ 5 µm ≲ 200 µs 150 kRad 3.1012 30 ∘C ALICE – ITS (in÷out) ~ 5÷10 µm 10-30 µs 700÷15 kRad 1.1013 CBM - MVD ≲ 10 MRad 1.1014 ≪0 ∘C ILD - VXD ≲ 3 µm ≲ 10 µs O(100 kRad) O(1011) ≲ 30 ∘C J.Baudot - CPS and PLUME operation principles - IN2P3-KEK BEAST meeting January 2015
3
MIMOSAs architecture Rolling-shutter = power reduction
One row powered at a time Parallel column read-out ➙ speed In-pixel double sampling ➙ column-level discrimination Continuously sensitive Read-out time = integration time 0-suppression = data compression Encode “fired pattern” address 1D: SUZE-01/03 2D: SUZE-02 Winning strategy if size of fired addresses < # pixels % level occupancy required Synchronous read-out Potential accelerations More rows read simultaneously Enlarged row height In-pixel discrimination ➡ AROM architecture J.Baudot - CPS and PLUME operation principles - IN2P3-KEK BEAST meeting January 2015
4
CPS proposed for BEAST-II
MIMOSA-26 (2008) AMS 0.35 µm Sensitive layer: 15 µm thick resistivity > 0.4 kΩ.cm Power dissipation 350 mW/cm2 Spatial resolution ~ 3 µm MISTRAL (expected Q4-2015) TowerJazz 0.18 µm Sensitive layer: 30 µm thick resistivity 1÷5 kΩ.cm Power dissipation ~ 100 mW/cm2 Spatial resolution < 10 µm MISTRAL 832x208 ~ 0.2 Mpixels Pitch 36x62.5 µm2 ➞ Sensitive area 13.0x30.0 mm2 ➞ Readout time 20 µs PRELIMINARY J.Baudot - CPS and PLUME operation principles - IN2P3-KEK BEAST meeting January 2015
5
Counting rate in MIMOSAs
MIMOSA features reminder: CDS in pixel / binary signal / synchronous rolling-shutter + 0-suppression + output Pixel limitation? One MIP per integration time per pixel MIMOSA-26: 10 MHz/cm2 Read-out limitations Various information bottlenecks Line max # patterns Memory size Output data throughput Information size ➙ # hits? Depends on hit local density Depends on pixel multiplicity Assumptions (for designed goals with occupancy ≪ 1%) MIMOSA-26: ~200 hits/frame ➙ ~106 hits/cm2/s MISTRAL: ~100(?) hits/frame ➙ ~(?).106 hits/cm2/s (designed for tracker outer layers) J.Baudot - CPS and PLUME operation principles - IN2P3-KEK BEAST meeting January 2015
6
Pixel multiplicity in clusters
WARNING: our CPS are not fully depleted Thermal motion rather than electric field drift density of collection node ➚ (smaller pitch) ➡ cluster size➘ Measured with low resistivity sensitive layer (14 µm thick): 10 µm pitch ⬄ <pixel mult.>~ against µm pitch ⬄ <pixel mult.>~3.4 Collection node size ➚ ➡ cluster size➘ Sensitive layer thickness ➚ ➡ cluster size➚ Sensitive layer resistivity ➚ ➡ cluster size➘ Very thin sensitive layer (15-30 µm) Impact of incident angle mitigated Example: MIMOSA-26, high resistivity 15 µm sens. layer tan(60∘)/tan(36∘)= /3.3 = 1.7 J.Baudot - CPS and PLUME operation principles - IN2P3-KEK BEAST meeting January 2015
7
Ionizing radiation tolerance
Mechanism on collection diode Charges (from ionization) accumulated in oxide ➡ leakage current➚➡ noise ➚ Treatment µ-circuits non-affected Driving parameters S/N problem Noise cannot be helped For fixed integration time For fixed temperature Enlarge Signal as much as poss. Collecting node size Pixel size Sensitive layer thickness & resistivity Tcoolant=20∘C Observations AMS 0.35 µm Validated to 300 kRad (STAR requirement) Not much known beyond BUT “good 1 Mrad for CPS in technology 0.35 µm XFAB TowerJazz 0.18 µm 3 Mrad OK for S/N (on analogue output sensor) D.Doering, U.Frankfurt J.Baudot - CPS and PLUME operation principles - IN2P3-KEK BEAST meeting January 2015
8
MISTRAL integration time
Nominal mode 208 rows Row read-out time 160 to 200 ns Integration time = 16.6 to 20.8 µs 0-suppression logic treats 208 rows synchronously with integration time Output memory (100 hits) read once after 208 rows treated Specific BEAST-2 mode Select 208/8 = 26 rows (1.6 mm) partial rolling-shutter Row read-out time unchanged (2 at a time) Effective integration time = µs without dead-time 0-suppression logic sees 8 times the same 26 rows Output memory delivers 8 times the 8 rows content after 208 rows 100 hits/208(=8x26) rows ➙ ~108 hits/s/cm2 J.Baudot - CPS and PLUME operation principles - IN2P3-KEK BEAST meeting January 2015
9
CPS proposed for BEAST-II
MIMOSA-26 (2008) AMS 0.35 µm Sensitive layer: 15 µm thick resistivity > 0.4 kΩ.cm Power dissipation 350 mW/cm2 Spatial resolution ~ 3 µm Validated for TID~3kGy will operate beyond that point with unknown degradation MISTRAL (expected Q4-2015) TowerJazz 0.18 µm Sensitive layer: 30 µm thick resistivity 1÷5 kΩ.cm Power dissipation ~ 100 mW/cm2 Spatial resolution < 10 µm Technology validated for TID~3MRad MISTRAL 832x208 ~ 0.2 Mpixels Pitch 36x62.5 µm2 ➞ Sensitive area 13.0x30.0 mm2 ➞ Readout time 20 µs (2µs for 26 rows) PRELIMINARY J.Baudot - CPS and PLUME operation principles - IN2P3-KEK BEAST meeting January 2015
10
PLUME Concept Production Beam test @ SPS (2011)
Double-sided layer of pixelated sensors Designed driven by ILC-VXD Air cooled Collab: Bristol, DESY, IPHC Production PLUME-1: MIMOSA-26 sensors Material budget 0.6% X0 2 functional ladders PLUME-2 (BEAST-2 proposition baseline) Material budget 0.35% X0 ≲10 ladders in production PLUME-3 (dedicated to BEAST-2) MISTRAL sensors Material budget guess ≲ 0.5 % X0 Few ladders goal Beam SPS (2011) Incident angle resolution: 0.2 degrees at 40 degrees J.Baudot - CPS and PLUME operation principles - IN2P3-KEK BEAST meeting January 2015
11
Conclusion Summary Outlook
Current (or nearly) available sensors have designed parameters driven by other experiments Assets Granularity Continuous integration Low material budget Thorough testing Outlook Designing a BEAST- phase – II specific sensor not out of the question Potential optimization Integration time (few µs over large surface) Occupancy (few %) BUT 20 ns time-stamping or gating mode unreachable (for next year) Readiness by Q at the earliest J.Baudot - CPS and PLUME operation principles - IN2P3-KEK BEAST meeting January 2015
12
Backups J.Baudot - CPS and PLUME operation principles - IN2P3-KEK BEAST meeting January 2015
13
In-pixel double sampling
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.