Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBennett Adams Modified over 6 years ago
1
Do as I Do, Not as I Say; Relations Between Narrative Script Production
and Everyday Action Benjamin L. Deck, Ashley Hagerty, Emily Roll, Tania Giovannetti, Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA Introduction Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is a syndrome characterized by subtle cognitive decline and typically precedes dementia, therefore it is paramount to accurately identify at-risk individuals Activities of daily living are disrupted in older adults with MCI and may predict future cognitive decline. Subtle action errors (micro-errors) on performance-based tests, such as the Naturalistic Action Task (NAT) occur in increased frequency in older adults with cognitive impairment. Given the evolutionary overlap between motor and language systems, true subtle action errors (e.g., micro-errors) may be associated with subtle language errors. If so, subtle language errors may be useful for assessing mild functional difficulties Hypotheses Subtle speech dis-fluencies are related to subtle action errors (i.e., micro-errors) in older adults with MCI. Speech and action errors will share similar cognitive correlates. Methods - Participants 28 individuals with MCI (M age=73.1; M education = 11.7) were recruited from an outpatient neuropsychology service in Philadelphia. - Everyday Action Performance Participants enacted the lunch task (action) which entailed packing a lunchbox with items in a drawer while avoiding potentially salient distractor objects. Performance was scored for overt errors (e.g., step omission, sequence errors, etc.) and micro-errors (e.g., action – object moved but not used; see Table 1). - Script Generation Task (SGT) Participants were asked to describe all steps required to pack a lunch with a sandwich, snack and a drink (script). Errors and pause or filler words -“uh” or “um” were coded from audio recordings (See Table 2). Table 4: M Total Errors on Script and NAT Tasks Table 5: Script x NAT Errors Spearman’s Correlations r (p) Table 1: NAT Micro-error Codes Script Overt Errors Speech Dis-fluencies NAT Overt Errors NAT Micro-errors - 0.21 (0.28) 0.18 (0.36) (.94) 0.30 (0.12) (.84) (.10) Script and NAT Errors X Neuropsychological Tests Script micro-errors correlated with measures of verbal fluency (FAS r=-0.43, p=.03) Action micro-errors correlated with measures of episodic memory (P[r]VLT immediate recall r=-0.45, p=.02). Table 2: Script Generation Error Codes * * Summary Micro-errors in everyday action were not significantly associated with subtle disfluencies in script production in an MCI population. Script and action errors were correlated with different cognitive measures that do not meaningfully overlap with subtle errors in everyday action and dis-fluencies in speech production. Conclusions Based on our population and methodology, language-based errors may not be used as a proxy for understanding everyday action in older adults Further research is needed to understand relations between motor and speech process Acknowledgements Diamond Research Scholars Program, Dr. Ibionu Lawrence Neuropsychological Measures Participants also completed: MMSE (cognitive impairment) P[r]VLT (episodic memory) WRAT-4 (general comprehension) FAS (verbal fluency) Digits Backwards (working memory) Results Table 3: Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of the Sample
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.