Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRobyn Chase Modified over 6 years ago
3
Outline Introduction to LHC Power Converters Remaining Inventory
Observed Availability New inventory – FGClite Cumulative & SEE Effects Maintenance Expectations Improving Availability
4
LHC Power Converters (1/3)
≈1050 in LHC radiation areas
5
LHC Power Converters (2/3) Inventory
Thurel, CERN’12
6
LHC Power Converters (3/3) Power & Control
After Todd, TWEPP’12 Control Part – FGC S. Uznanski Power Part – Voltage Source Y. Thurel
7
Observed Availability in 2012
Hardware failures leading to a beam dump from Post Mortem After Todd, Evian’12 All faults: Post Mortem, EPC Equipment and RadWG New controller needed: FGClite
8
FGClite (1/3) Technical Concept
Dedicated design methodology: No microcontrollers/DSP as computationally intensive tasks moved to the gateway Extensive radiation testing to select/validate all electronic components Highly available Gateway/FGClite communication required
9
FGClite (2/3) Challenges
Reliable communication infrastructure FGClite infrastructure (TE-EPC): Robust FGClite hardware Robust Gateway software and hardware World FIP (BE-CO): FGClite/Gateway communication modules Robust repeaters, cabling, etc… Field Bus functional tests (BE-CO): High speed, high temp, long cables, 30 days Not sufficient statistics
10
FGClite (3/3) Installation
FGClite project planning 2015 2015/16 2016/17 First Beam & Physics Increasing failure rate FGC2 not acceptable FGC2 OK ? nOK FGClite Production/Burn-in ? OK FGClite burn-in & installation Infant mortality failures FGClite operational FGC2 ≈ 1700 units ≈1050 units Number of FGCs ≈650 units FGClite Time 2015: FGC2 will be used after LS1 for the first months as its failure rate will be acceptable 2015/16: FGC2 will start failing due to increasing radiation levels thus FGClite will be installed 2016/17: Operational FGClite will exhibit much lower failure rate than FGC2 after infant mortality issues are addressed.
11
Estimated reliability post-LS1
Radiation environment Radiation Levels Røed, CERN’12 Brugger, CERN Oct. 14 Accumulated dose SEE related
12
Long term supply of components: Preventive maintenance:
Maintenance Plan Long term supply of components: Batches of components (1600x FGClite) 1400x production 1100x in operation 20% spares 30x Pre-series 20x Rad Testing 150x future repairs (storage in controlled atmosphere?) 50x prototyping Preventive maintenance: Rotation of devices as a function of accumulated dose: Each FGClite has an embedded radiation monitor (SRAM-based) Based on dose measurement, a rotation of devices will be done ~10% in hottest locations swapped every LS ~10% in hottest locations swapped every year Expected access: Infant mortality failures (2016) higher Operational FGClite (>2016) same as for the FGC2
13
Improving Availability
Availability limited by electronics exposed to radiation Further optimization would require changing the gateway/front-end communication to get higher throughput
14
Conclusions Remaining/New inventory analyzed Cumulative/SEE Effects
Relocation done where possible Most of the equipment will remain in affected environments Cumulative/SEE Effects TID can become problematic for HL-LHC if no mitigation Rotation of the FGClites will be needed in long term Failures due to SEEs will be addressed in the FGClite Maintenance expectations Supply of components will cover spares/prototyping/testing needs Preventive maintenance will be done as a function of TID Improving availability Number of exposed components is strictly limited with the FGClite Additional improvements would require higher throughput communications
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.