Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLucinda Thornton Modified over 6 years ago
1
PittCon 2001: Paper #645 Mark G. Hartell and W. Charles Neely
NOVEL SENSOR DESIGN PLATFORM COMBINING MOLECULAR SELF-ASSEMBLY WITH LANGMUIR-BLODGETT TECHNOLOGY FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF UNIQUE CELL-SPECIFIC PEPTIDES Mark G. Hartell and W. Charles Neely Department of Chemistry Alexander M. Samoylov Tatiana I. Samolylova and Bruce F. Smith Scott-Ritchey Research Center Vitaly Vodyanoy Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Pharmacology Auburn University MDA * DARPA * U.S. Army
2
Project Overview Project Background: Project Requirement:
Identify cell surface markers specific to muscle myotubes in the development of a novel class of gene therapy vectors to combat forms of muscular dystrophy Project Requirement: A rapid and simple test bed to measure specificity of selected peptide ligands against a variety of tissue homogenates Novel Application: Langmuir-Blodgett and Self-Assembly Design and construct a novel sensor using LB thin-film technology and molecular self-assembly to yield a peptide-specific sensor
3
Selection of Tissue-Specific Ligands using a Random Peptide-Presenting Phage Library
Phage Library Concept Insertion of a DNA fragment, fixed in length but with unspecified codons, in a phage surface protein gene, pIII, results in a fusion protein on the phage surface Phage surface protein gene expresses codons for specific peptides to attach to specific tissues in host Isolating phage DNA yields sequence information for this tissue-specific peptide
4
The Langmuir-Blodgett Technique
Molecule of interest is spread into a monolayer film Area dimensions are controlled by a movable barrier Molecular orientation well controlled in 2-dimensions Can be used to engineer highly ordered, molecularly thin layers
5
LB Film Deposition System
SYSTEM SUMMARY System contained in laminar flow hood Trough is milled from solid Teflon block Computer controlled KSV 2200 LB System Deposition Parameters 20 0.1 C set = 25 mN/m 25 mm/min compression to set Subphase pH 7.41 55 mM KCl, 4 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2 & 2 mM MOPS
6
LB Technology and Biosensor Construction
Determination of surface properties provides unique understanding of molecular orientation and monolayer stability COME TO TALK ON FRIDAY LB technology provides heightened control of compact, organized, molecularly thin films Ultra-thin film biosensors yield competitive sensitivity and detection limits Simple sample preparation and stability of fluorescence Hartell, M.G., Neely, W.C., Vodyanoy, V. “Study of the Chemical, Physical and Optical Properties of a Lipophilic Hydroxycoumarin Analog in Mixed Monolayers.” Pittsburgh Conference on Analytical Chemistry and Applied Spectroscopy. Abstract #1338. Seminar. New Orleans, LA, March 4-9, :50 AM FRIDAY Pathirana, S.T., Barbaree, J., Chin, B.A., Hartell, M.G., Neely, W.C., Vodyanoy, V. Rapid and Sensitive Biosensor for Salmonella. Biosensors Bioelectron, 15, , 2000.
7
Quartz Crystal Microbalance
SPECIFICATIONS Measures AT-cut planar quartz crystals with a 5 MHz nominal oscillating frequency Frequency resolution of 0.5 Hz at 5 MHz Mass resolution of 10 ng/cm2 Maxtek PM-700 Plating Monitor QCM Methods QCM crystals coated with sensor material Homogenate tested in PBS Test 1 mL ambient solution Signal relative to PBS blank m ~ V
8
Close-Up View of QCM Crystals
Probe Arm Obverse Reverse Mass loading onto Au electrode surface changes measured oscillating frequency of quartz wafer
9
Why Use LB Technology? QCM YYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYY QCM QCM YYYYYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYY QCM QCM Thin-film biosensors have the benefit of lower mass loading for increased detection sensitivity
10
Approach to Sensor Construction
Need a manner by which a peptide strand can be attached to the QCM substrate LB technology provides a technique to produce molecularly thin, highly organized films – but depositing peptides is a problem Can use LB technology to construct an organized foundation onto which the peptide may be attached Attach peptide using a molecular self-assembly procedure Combination of both techniques provides better control over sensor construction than either singular approach
11
LB Films and Molecular Self-Assembly
QCM Crystal: Peptide Sensor to Differentiate Tissue Gravimetric detection of binding event Sensor designed to be specific against mouse muscle tissue Incorporates novel mix of LB film with molecular assembly Make organized lipid foundation via LB technology Assemble sensor onto organized foundation to yield organized complex design General Design Concept Goals: Use sensor as test fixture in selecting tissue-specific ligands Novel testing regime allows for fast determination of specificity and sensitivity of test ligands Application aimed at discovering human-tissue ligands for better therapeutic drug designs
12
The Foundation: a Biotinated Phospholipid
First Step in Sensor Construction Lipid tail is ideal for LB film construction Phospholipid structure compresses to a stable, highly organized monolayer film Film may be deposited successfully onto QCM surface Biotinated headgroup provides a site for further attachment via molecular assembly
13
Position of QCM slides during deposition 2 sets back-to-back crystals
LB Film Deposition DEPOSITION SUMMARY QCM crystals placed back-to-back: deposit material on one side only Compress biotinilated lipid to a constant 25 mN/m at 20 C ~9 layers deposited Transfer ratios indicate Y type deposited layers Position of QCM slides during deposition 2 sets back-to-back crystals Transfer ratios during deposition similar to LB literature for biomolecules
14
The Glue to Hold Everything Together: Streptavidin
Streptavidin has high affinity for biotin Streptavidin can bind two biotin molecules on each face Provides the middle layer of this molecular assembly “sandwich” Four binding sites are symmetrically positioned Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 add streptavidin add biotin-protein LB film
15
Peptide Ligand Found to be Selective to Mouse Muscle
Muscle Blocked Kidney Brain Liver QCM Response Voltages Muscle Indicates stronger response with mouse muscle versus kidney, brain and liver Sensitivity and Vmax Clear difference in response characteristics with mouse muscle blocked by peptide
16
Blocking Studies Confirm Specificity
Tissue homogenate Kd, mg/mL Vmax, mV Mouse muscle ± ± 4.0 Blocked m. muscle ± ± 3.0 Kd were calculated from Hill plots, Vmax were estimated from dose-response curves.
17
Conclusions Mouse Tissue Sensitivity (S) Selectivity coef. (K) Selectivity ratio (R) mV/decade Relative unitsa Relative unitsb Muscle 134 ± Kidney ± 7.0 (3.1 ± 1.0) × (9.3 ± 3.2) × 10-5 Brain ± 16 (4.6 ± 1.4) × (3.4 ± 1.1) × 10-3 Liver ± 6.0 (5.0 ± 1.5) × (1.1 ± 0.4) × 10-3 a Change of the output voltage is empirically described as: V = A + S log C, C = bulk concentration of tissue homogenate, A = constant, S = slope of dose response dependence, defined as the sensitivity of the sensor. Coef. selectivity defined as the ratio of slopes: K = Stissue/Smuscle b Selectivity ratio (R) is defined as the concentration ratio of the primary to interfering tissue homogenate (Cmuscle/ Ctissue) which gives the same response change at the same conditions. R was calculated at 0.01 mg/mL of muscle homogenate using experimental equations: Vmuscle = log C Vkidney = log C Vbrain = log C Vliver = log C
18
Conclusions LB technology may be used in conjunction with other techniques, such as molecular self-assembly to yield better biosensor construction Ultra-thin film biosensors constructed from LB monolayers may be a fast and simple alternative to selectivity determinations
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.