Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Published byMargaret Riley Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre.
From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From Long-Time Subscribers Gerontologist. Published online April 08, doi: /geront/gnx029 Gerontologist | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

2 Figure 2. Structural model for theatre involvement and benefit related to psychological well-being showing standardized coefficients. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From Long-Time Subscribers Gerontologist. Published online April 08, doi: /geront/gnx029 Gerontologist | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

Download ppt "Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From."

Similar presentations

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation

From: A Regularist Approach to Mechanistic Type-Level Explanation
From: An open day in the metric space

From: An open day in the metric space
Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.

Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.
Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates

Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates
From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.
Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Fig. 1 Graphical representation
Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.
Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.
Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.

Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.
From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution
Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.

Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.
Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no

Figure 1. Disposition of study participants, by group. Data are no
Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.
Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.

Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.
Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.

Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.
Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.

Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.
Figure 1. Mean recalled time (days) since the start of the last quit attempt by use of stop-smoking medications (SSM) and Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)

Figure 1. Mean recalled time (days) since the start of the last quit attempt by use of stop-smoking medications (SSM) and Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)
Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.

Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.
Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.

Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google