1. iTIXI Version 2.0 Quality of Webservices, Google Maps vs. Open Street Map (OSM) VersionDatumAuthorStatusKommentar 1.005.04.2014Martin JonasseDraftInitial-Dokument Historie

2. iTIXI Architecture and routing iTIXI Version 2.0 Provider iTIXI app iTIXI db Symfony2 PHP (C++) Symfony2 PHP (C++) MySQL Linux Apache production-server Firewall Provider Disponent Provider in 6300 Zug, Schweiz Mandant: TIXIZUG BUSPRO: Buchhaltung Google: Geocode API Provider: Email, VOIP (Home)Office Support dev-server Manager Homeoffice Fahrer Mandant: TIXIZUG

3. Quality of map information iTIXI Version 2.0 Google MapsOpen Street Map Source: https://www.google.de/mapshttps://www.google.de/maps Source: http://www.osm.ch/#http://www.osm.ch/#

4. Quality of geocoding information iTIXI Version 2.0 100% = ROOFTOPAverage precision (sameness) +3.5% 35.7% 88.6% Source: Geocoding_Example5a.xlsm

5. Average Geocoding Time iTIXI Version 2.0 Source: http://blog.programmableweb.com/2012/06/21/7-free-geocoding-apis-google-bing-yahoo-and-mapquest/

6. Quality of routing information iTIXI Version 2.0 Add 1 Minute to the mapquest route duration, then results are same + 2 minutes. Source: Geocoding_Example5a.xlsm

7. Average Routing Time iTIXI Version 2.0 Source: http://neis-one.org/2011/07/comparison-reloaded/

8. Webservice availability iTIXI Version 2.0 Providers typically state 99.9% availability. A chance of 1 in 1000 of seeing the above.

9. Q&A See also: iTIXI_Google_Alternatives.pptx