1. Transaction Management and Concurrency
Chapter 16
The slides for this text are organized into chapters. This lecture covers Chapter 16, providing an overview of transactions, concurrency control, and recovery.
This chapter is the first of a sequence (Chapters16, 17, and 18) on transaction management that might be covered in full in a course with a systems emphasis. It can also be used stand-alone, as a self-contained overview of these issues, in a course with an application emphasis. It covers the essential concepts in sufficient detail to support a discussion of physical database design and tuning in Chapter 20.

2. A transaction is a sequence of operations that must be executed as a whole.
BUSEY SAVINGS
Winslett
$1000
BUSEY CHECKING
Winslett $0
Transfer $500
Debit savings
Credit checking
Either both (1) and (2) happen or neither!
Every DB action takes place inside a transaction.

3. Transactions
Concurrent execution of user programs is essential for good DBMS performance.
Because disk accesses are frequent, and relatively slow, it is important to keep the cpu humming by working on several user programs concurrently.
A user’s program may carry out many operations on the data retrieved from the database, but the DBMS is only concerned about what data is read/written from/to the database.
A transaction is the DBMS’s abstract view of a user program: a sequence of reads and writes.

4. Transaction Concept
A transaction is a unit of program execution that accesses and possibly updates various data items.
E.g. transaction to transfer $50 from account A to account B:
1. read(A)
2. A := A – 50
3. write(A)
4. read(B)
5. B := B + 50
6. write(B)
Two main issues to deal with:
Failures of various kinds, such as hardware failures and system crashes
Concurrent execution of multiple transactions 5

5. Example of Fund Transfer
Transaction to transfer $50 from account A to account B:
1. read(A)
2. A := A – 50
3. write(A)
4. read(B)
5. B := B + 50
6. write(B)
Atomicity requirement
if the transaction fails after step 3 and before step 6, money will be “lost” leading to an inconsistent database state
Failure could be due to software or hardware
the system should ensure that updates of a partially executed transaction are not reflected in the database
Durability requirement — once the user has been notified that the transaction has completed (i.e., the transfer of the $50 has taken place), the updates to the database by the transaction must persist even if there are software or hardware failures. 6

6. Example of Fund Transfer (Cont.)
1. read(A)
2. A := A – 50
3. write(A)
4. read(B)
5. B := B + 50
6. write(B)
Consistency requirement:
the sum of A and B is unchanged by the execution of the transaction
In general, consistency requirements include
Explicitly specified integrity constraints such as primary and foreign keys
Implicit integrity constraints
e.g. sum of balances of all accounts, minus sum of loan amounts must equal value of cash-in-hand
A transaction must see a consistent database.
During transaction execution the database may be temporarily inconsistent.
When the transaction completes successfully the database must be consistent 7

7. Example of Fund Transfer (Cont.)
Isolation requirement — if between steps 3 and 6, another transaction T2 is allowed to access the partially updated database, it will see an inconsistent database (the sum A + B will be less than it should be) T T2
1. read(A)
2. A := A – 50
3. write(A) read(A), read(B), print(A+B)
4. read(B)
5. B := B + 50
6. write(B
Isolation can be ensured trivially by running transactions serially
that is, one after the other.
However, executing multiple transactions concurrently has significant benefits, as we will see later. 8

8. ACID Properties
Atomicity. refers to the ability of the DBMS to guarantee that either all of the tasks of a transaction are performed or none of them are.
Consistency. property ensures that the database remains in a consistent state before the start of the transaction and after the transaction is over (whether successful or not). 9

9. ACID Properties
Isolation. Although multiple transactions may execute concurrently, each transaction must be unaware of other concurrently executing transactions. Intermediate transaction results must be hidden from other concurrently executed transactions.
That is, for every pair of transactions Ti and Tj, it appears to Ti that either Tj, finished execution before Ti started, or Tj started execution after Ti finished.
Durability. refers to the guarantee that once the user has been notified of success, the transaction will persist, and not be undone. This means it will survive system failure, and that the database system has checked the integrity constraints and won't need to abort the transaction.
Many databases implement durability by writing all transactions into a log that can be played back to recreate the system state right before the failure. A transaction can only be deemed committed after it is safely in the log.

10. Why do we need transactions?
Transaction 1: Add $100 to account A
Transaction 2: Add $200 to account A
R(A)
W(A)
R(A)
W(A)
Time

11. What will be the final account balance?
Transaction 1: Add $100 to account A
Transaction 2: Add $200 to account A
R(A)
W(A)
R(A)
W(A)
Time
The Lost Update Problem

12. What will be the final account balance?
Transaction 1: Add $100 to account A
Transaction 2: Add $200 to account A
R(A)
W(A)
F A I L
R(A)
W(A)
Time
Dirty reads cause problems.

13. Atomicity and Durability
To ensure atomicity and durability, an aborted transaction must have no effect on the database.
Any changes that have been done by an aborted transaction must be undone.
Once the changes caused by an aborted transaction have been rolled back, we say that transaction has been Rolled back.
Recovery scheme manages transaction aborts
Maintaining logs: each db modification is first recorded in the log. This provides the possibility of redoing.
A transaction that completes its execution successfully is said to be committed.

14. Transaction State
Active – the initial state; the transaction stays in this state while it is executing
Partially committed – after the final statement has been executed.
Failed -- after the discovery that normal execution can no longer proceed.
Aborted – after the transaction has been rolled back and the database restored to its state prior to the start of the transaction. Two options after it has been aborted:
restart the transaction
can be done only if no internal logical error
kill the transaction
Committed – after successful completion. 15

15. Transaction State (Cont.)16

16. Concurrent Executions
Multiple transactions are allowed to run concurrently in the system. Advantages are:
increased processor and disk utilization, leading to better transaction throughput
E.g. one transaction can be using the CPU while another is reading from or writing to the disk
reduced average response time for transactions: short transactions need not wait behind long ones.
Concurrency control schemes – mechanisms to achieve isolation
that is, to control the interaction among the concurrent transactions in order to prevent them from destroying the consistency of the database 17

17. Schedule (Çalışma Planı)
Schedule – a sequence of instructions that specify the chronological order in which instructions of concurrent transactions are executed
a schedule for a set of transactions must consist of all instructions of those transactions
must preserve the order in which the instructions appear in each individual transaction.
A transaction that successfully completes its execution will have a commit instruction as the last statement
by default transaction assumed to execute commit instruction as its last step
A transaction that fails to successfully complete its execution will have an abort instruction as the last statement 19

18. Schedule 1
Let T1 transfer $50 from A to B, and T2 transfer 10% of the balance from A to B.
A serial schedule in which T1 is followed by T2 : 20

19. Schedule 2
A serial schedule where T2 is followed by T1 21

20. Schedule 3
Let T1 and T2 be the transactions defined previously. The following schedule is not a serial schedule, but it is equivalent to Schedule 1.
In Schedules 1, 2 and 3, the sum A + B is preserved. 22

21. Schedule 4
The following concurrent schedule does not preserve the value of (A + B ). 23

22. Example Consider two transactions:
T1: BEGIN A=A+100, B=B END
T2: BEGIN A=1.06*A, B=1.06*B END
Intuitively, the first transaction is transferring $100 from B’s account to A’s account. The second is crediting both accounts with a 6% interest payment.
There is no guarantee that T1 will execute before T2 or vice-versa, if both are submitted together. However, the net effect must be equivalent to these two transactions running serially in some order.

23. Problems with Concurrency
Consider a possible interleaving (schedule):
T1: A=A+100, B=B-100
T2: A=1.06*A, B=1.06*B
This is OK. But what about:
T1: A=A+100, B=B-100
T2: A=1.06*A, B=1.06*B
The DBMS’s view of the second schedule:
T1: R(A), W(A), R(B), W(B)
T2: R(A), W(A), R(B), W(B)

24. Anomalies with Interleaved Execution
Reading Uncommitted Data (WR Conflicts, “dirty reads”):
The problem is you may read a data in a inconsistent state
T1: R(A), W(A), R(B), W(B), Abort
T2: R(A), W(A), C
T1: A=A+100, B=B-100
T2: A=1.06*A, B=1.06*B

25. Anomalies with Interleaved Execution
Unrepeatable Reads (RW Conflicts):
If T1 was to run in isolation, it would always see A having the same value
T1: R(A), R(A), W(A), C
T2: R(A), W(A), C

26. Serial Schedule
If any action of transaction T1 precedes any action of T2, then all action of T1 precede all action of T2
The correctness principle tells us that every serial schedule will preserve consistency of the database state
T1’s actions
T2’s actions
Time 28

27. Serial Schedule is Not Necessarily Desirable
Improved throughput
I/O activity can be done in parallel with processing at CPU
Reduced average waiting time
If transactions run serially, a short transaction may have to wait for a preceding long transaction to complete 29

28. Scheduling Transactions
Serial schedule: Schedule that does not interleave the actions of different transactions.
Equivalent schedules: For any database state, the effect (on the set of objects in the database) of executing the first schedule is identical to the effect of executing the second schedule.
Serializable schedule: A schedule that is equivalent to some serial execution of the transactions.
(Note: If each transaction preserves consistency, every serializable schedule preserves consistency. )

29. A schedule is serializable if it is guaranteed to give the same final result as some serial schedule.
Which of these are serializable?
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)

30. Serializability
Basic Assumption – Each transaction preserves database consistency.
Thus serial execution of a set of transactions preserves database consistency.
A (possibly concurrent) schedule is serializable if it is equivalent to a serial schedule. Different forms of schedule equivalence give rise to the notions of:
1. conflict serializability
2. view serializability 32

31. Simplified view of transactions
We ignore operations other than read and write instructions
We assume that transactions may perform arbitrary computations on data in local buffers in between reads and writes.
Our simplified schedules consist of only read and write instructions. 33

32. Conflicting Instructions
Instructions li and lj of transactions Ti and Tj respectively, conflict if and only if there exists some item Q accessed by both li and lj, and at least one of these instructions wrote Q.
1. li = read(Q), lj = read(Q). li and lj don’t conflict li = read(Q), lj = write(Q). They conflict li = write(Q), lj = read(Q). They conflict li = write(Q), lj = write(Q). They conflict
Intuitively, a conflict between li and lj forces a (logical) temporal order between them.
If li and lj are consecutive in a schedule and they do not conflict, their results would remain the same even if they had been interchanged in the schedule. 34

33. Conflict Serializability
If a schedule S can be transformed into a schedule S´ by a series of swaps of non-conflicting instructions, we say that S and S´ are conflict equivalent.
Alternate Definition:
Two schedules are conflict equivalent if:
Involve the same actions of the same transactions
Every pair of conflicting actions is ordered the same way
Schedule S is conflict serializable if S is conflict equivalent to some serial schedule

34. Conflict Serializability (Cont.)
Schedule 3 can be transformed into Schedule 6, a serial schedule where T2 follows T1, by series of swaps of non-conflicting instructions. Therefore Schedule 3 is conflict serializable.
Schedule 3
Schedule 6 36

35. Conflict Serializability (Cont.)
Example of a schedule that is not conflict serializable:
We are unable to swap instructions in the above schedule to obtain either the serial schedule < T3, T4 >, or the serial schedule < T4, T3 >. 37

36. Test for Conflict-Serializability
Can decide whether or not a schedule S is conflict-serializable
Ideas:
when there are conflicting actions that appear anywhere in S, the transactions performing those actions must appear in the same order in any conflict-equivalent serial schedule
Summarize those conflicting actions in a precedence graph 38

37. Testing for Serializability
Consider some schedule of a set of transactions T1, T2, ..., Tn
Precedence graph — a direct graph where the vertices are the transactions (names).
We draw an arc from Ti to Tj if the two transaction conflict, and Ti accessed the data item on which the conflict arose earlier.
We may label the arc by the item that was accessed.
Example 1 39

38. Precedence Graphs
T1 takes precedence over T2 (T1 <S T2), if there are actions A1 of T1 and A2 of T2, s.t.
A1 is ahead of A2 in S
Both A1 and A2 involve the same database element
At least one of A1 and A2 is a written action
Construct a precedence graph and ask if there are any cycles 40

39. Certain pairs of operations conflict with each other.
Write(A) Write(A)
Write(A)
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)

40. Let’s clean up by collapsing all the nodes for a transaction into one big node.
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)
Blue Black
Blue Black
Blue Black

41. Let’s clean up by collapsing all the nodes for a transaction into one big node.
A schedule is conflict serializable iff its dependency graph is acyclic.
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)
Read(A)
Write(A)
Read(B)
Write(B)
Blue Black
Blue Black
Blue Black

42. Is this schedule conflict serializable?
T T T3
T T T3
R1(A)
R2(C)
W2(C)
W1(A)
R1(C)
W1(C)
R3(C)
W3(C)
R2(B)
W2(B)
R2(C)
W2(C)
R2(B)
W2(B)
R1(A)
W1(A)
R1(C)
W1(C)
R3(C)
W3(C)
Schedule S2
Schedule S1

43. What serial schedule is S1 equivalent to, if any?
R(A)
W(A)
R(C)
W(C)
R)C(
W(B)
R(B)
W(B)
R(A)
W(A)
R(B)
R(C)
W(C)
R)C(

44. Nothing What serial schedule is S1 equivalent to, if any? S1 R(A) W(A)
R(C)
W(C)
R)A(
Nothing

45. Example
S: r2(A); r1(B); w2(A); r3(A); w1(B); w3(A); r2(B); w2(B); 1 2 3
S’: r1(B); w1(B); r2(A); w2(A); r2(B); w2(B); r3(A); w3(A); 47

46. Example
S1: r2(A); r1(B); w2(A); r2(B); r3(A); w1(B); w3(A); w2(B); 1 2 3 48

47. Test for Conflict Serializability
A schedule is conflict serializable if and only if its precedence graph is acyclic.
Cycle-detection algorithms exist which take order n2 time, where n is the number of vertices in the graph.
(Better algorithms take order n + e where e is the number of edges.)
If precedence graph is acyclic, the serializability order can be obtained by a topological sorting of the graph.
This is a linear order consistent with the partial order of the graph. 49

48. Recoverable Schedules
Need to address the effect of transaction failures on concurrently running transactions.
Recoverable schedule — if a transaction Tj reads a data item previously written by a transaction Ti , then the commit operation of Ti appears before the commit operation of Tj.
The following schedule (Schedule 11) is not recoverable if T9 commits immediately after the read
If T8 should abort, T9 would have read (and possibly shown to the user) an inconsistent database state. Hence, database must ensure that schedules are recoverable. 50

49. Cascading Rollbacks
Cascading rollback – a single transaction failure leads to a series of transaction rollbacks. Consider the following schedule where none of the transactions has yet committed (so the schedule is recoverable) If T10 fails, T11 and T12 must also be rolled back.
Can lead to the undoing of a significant amount of work 51

50. Cascadeless Schedules
Cascadeless schedules — cascading rollbacks cannot occur; for each pair of transactions Ti and Tj such that Tj reads a data item previously written by Ti, the commit operation of Ti appears before the read operation of Tj.
Every cascadeless schedule is also recoverable
It is desirable to restrict the schedules to those that are cascadeless 52