1. Toolmarks made by lathe chuck jaws
Nir Finkelstein, Ayal Aronson, Tsadok Tsach 
Forensic Science International 
Volume 275, Pages (June 2017)
DOI: /j.forsciint
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Two of the 45 improvised rifle barrels in various stages of manufacturing. One measuring 65 and the other 75cm long.
Forensic Science International  , DOI: ( /j.forsciint )
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
(a) Three-jaw chuck body (φ160mm max 250n/min); (b) three jaws removed from the chuck.
Forensic Science International  , DOI: ( /j.forsciint )
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
A lead sheet with impression marks, after being taken off the sample rod.
Forensic Science International  , DOI: ( /j.forsciint )
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
One set of evenly-spaced longitudinal impression marks found on two of the impounded barrels.
Forensic Science International  , DOI: ( /j.forsciint )
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

6. Fig. 5
Three sets of jaw impressions, made on the lead sheets by one of the impounded chucks; note individual characteristics.
Forensic Science International  , DOI: ( /j.forsciint )
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

7. Fig. 6
Class characteristics for Barrel A, Barrel B, and a set of replicated jaw impressions.
Forensic Science International  , DOI: ( /j.forsciint )
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions

8. Fig. 7
Comparing individual characteristics of the replicated jaw impressions to the impressions found on Barrel B (comparison microscope; mag. ×60). Arrows indicate matches.
Forensic Science International  , DOI: ( /j.forsciint )
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Terms and Conditions