1. Laws, Clause, Cases Review
Please define the following to a peer
Title IX of Education Act
Welfare Reform Act
Due Process of the 5th Amendment
Free Exercise Clause
Griswold v. Connecticut
Loving v. Virginia

2. Freedom of Speech April 3, 2017
Objective: what can you say and still be protected?

3. "I know a man who is firm - he's firm in his pants, he's firm in his shirt, his character is firm - but most [of] all, his belief in you the students of Bethel, is firm. Jeff Kuhlman is a man who takes his point and pounds it in. If necessary, he'll take an issue and nail it to the wall. He doesn't attack things in spurts - he drives hard, pushing and pushing until finally - he succeeds. Jeff is a man who will go to the very end - even the climax, for each and every one of you. So please vote for Jeff Kuhlman, as he'll never come [long pause] between us and the best our school can be. He is firm enough to give it everything."

4. I. Intro
Belief,
Speech,
Action,
Hate Speech

5. II. Courts is speech protected
Bad (dangerous) doctrine
(Hate speech v. Hate crime)
Clear and present danger doctrine
(Fire!)
Prior Restraint doctrine
Before it’s given(WBC)
Least drastic means test
Ashcroft v. ACLU, 2002

6. III. Other Areas of Speech
Political speech
less restricteddemocracy
“Fighting words”
not protected (violence)

7. III. Other areas of speech
Symbolic Speech
US v. O’Brien, 1968
Texas v. Johnson, 1989
Sedition
Smith Act, 1940=banned advocacy
SC:
Imminent dangeroverthrow
Doing vs. Believe!
Obscenity