Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMatilda Richard Modified over 6 years ago
1
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
Experiments with Less than Best Effort (LBE) Quality of Service on GÉANT Tiziana Ferrari Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
2
Experimental set-up (cont)
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
3
Performance without congestion
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
4
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
One-way delay Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
5
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
IPDV traffic volume: [10, 50] % 2 flows (1 LBE, 1 BE) maximum IPDV (BE): 11 usec sample of 100 consecutive packets IPDV negligible for both LBE and BE Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
6
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
Packet reordering - proportional to packet rate affecting both LBE and BE maximum IPDV (BE): 11 usec sample of 100 consecutive packets packet reordering due to the M-160 architecture Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
7
Performance with congestion
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
8
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
Packet loss 3 LBE streams (75% of traffic load), 1 BE stream (25%), plus BE production traffic in case of LBE congestion: no BE packet loss no IP Premium packet loss (when IP Premium traffic is injected) only LBE packet loss, proportional to the amount of LBE traffic injected Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
9
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
Throughput 7 LBE streams, 2 BE streams, 1 IPP stream load: [50, 100] % in case of LBE congestion (traffic load: 100% of a STM-16) : BE and IPP per-flow throughput equals the UDP input rate only LBE throughput affected by LBE congestion Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
10
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
One-way delay 100 streams, 98 streams DE2 -> IT, 2 streams DE2 -> DE1 (LBE and BE) LBE: increase in both average and max one-way delay in case of congestion max delta (max – min): msec BE: Slight increse of average and max one-way delay Max delta (max – min): msec Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
11
One-way delay frequency distributions (LBE)
test duration: 10 sec time divided in time intervals of 0.1 sec each -> 100 intervals for each interval, min/avg/max one-way delay is recorded Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
12
One-way delay frequency distributions (BE)
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
13
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
IPDV (LBE) 2 streams: 1 LBE stream, 1 BE stream (DE2 -> IT) considerable increase in maximum LBE IPDV no difference in IPDV frequency distributions with and without congestion (100 consecutive packets) Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
14
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
Packet reordering BE queue priority = LBE queue priority = high extremely high percentage of out-of-order packets in case of congestion percentage is a function of the packet rate of a given stream it affects both BE and LBE traffic the configuration of different queue priorities solves the problem of throughput loss of BE end-to-end TCP streams Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
15
Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
Conclusions LBE DSCP transparency on GEANT is possible Correct isolation of BE traffic from LBE congestion Negligible impact on BE one-way delay and IPDV Packet reordering can be greatly reduced so that end-to-end TCP throughput is preserved, by: assigning a lower weight to the EF queue Configuring different priorities to the LBE and BE queues Packet reordering seems to affect TCP best-effort throughput if the parameters are wrong. Experiment with LBE Quality of Service on GÉANT
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.