1. Module 1: Common Core Instruction for ELA & Literacy
Session 6: Writing from Sources
Audience: 6-12 ELA & Content Area Teachers
Welcome participants, and introduce the subject for today.
Suggest that participants sit in small groups with others who teach the same grade level(s).
Check to see that everyone has the handouts.
Explain that one of the instructional implications of implementing the CCSS will be an increased emphasis on writing in response to sources and writing from multiple sources.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“In Session 5, we looked at the important place textual evidence has in the Common Core State Standards. Today we are going to look at a closely related shift: The emphasis in the CCSS on writing from sources, both in the analysis of individual works as well as in writing from multiple sources during research.”

2. Expected Outcomes
Become familiar with the emphasis on writing from sources.
Become familiar with the Common Core State Standards for argument and informative writing at your grade level.
Understand the relationship between the CCSS Reading Standards and Writing Standard 9.
Become aware of resources in the Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework; K-12 Teachers: Building Comprehension in the Common Core and the related online resource “Suites of Standards-Based Writing Lessons” at ODE
Go over the expected outcomes for this session.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“Some of the highest priorities of the Common Core State Standards are that students be able to read closely, gain knowledge from texts, and support that knowledge with evidence from the text, both orally and in writing. Today we will look at the standards associated with writing from sources, an important aspect of college and career readiness.
This includes both argument and informative writing from single or multiple sources.”

3. What is the instructional shift?
Increased emphasis on
Analysis of individual texts
Argument and evidence
Informative/explanatory writing
Frequent short, focused research projects
Comparison and synthesis of multiple sources
Decreased emphasis on
Narrative, especially personal narrative
Writing in response to decontextualized prompts
Explain that one of the instructional shifts required by the Common Core State Standards will be a shift toward more class time and student writing being devoted to argument and informative writing that derives its content from texts, both in ELA as well as the content areas. This includes analyses of individual texts as well as research projects.
This is balanced by a corresponding decrease in the class time and student writing being devoted to narrative writing, especially the personal narrative, as well as writing in response to decontextualized prompts.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“One of the significant shifts in implementing the CCSS will be in the proportion of class time and student writing being devoted to various types of writing in ELA as well as the content areas. The CCSS increasingly emphasizes argument and informative writing over narrative writing as students progress through the grades. Further, it emphasizes the type of argument and informative writing that is tied closely to texts, deriving its content from the texts. Logical arguments are supported with evidence from texts; explanations are developed with evidence from texts.
This is balanced by a decrease, as students progress through the grades, in the amount of time spent writing narratives, especially personal narratives – such as the familiar ‘Write about a time you experienced ….’ It also de-emphasizes the use of decontextualized prompts that require no reference to texts – prompts such as ‘Explain your concept of what makes a hero,’ or “What does freedom mean to you?’”

4. What is “writing from sources”?
Analytical writing tied to literary and informational texts; writing in response to texts; writing about texts.
Students analyze the text, make valid claims about the text, and support those claims with evidence from the text.
Writing arguments and informational reports from sources.
Using evidence from texts to present careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.
Generating reports from research; writing from multiple sources.
Explain that “writing from sources” includes familiar writing tasks such as literary analysis and research projects.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“Writing from sources is, in general, analytical writing in response to literary and informational texts. Students are expected to use evidence from texts to present careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.
Inevitably, it is integrated closely with Reading in ELA, history/social studies, science, and technical subjects.
Rather than asking students questions they can answer from their prior knowledge or experience, the standards expect students to answer questions that depend on their having closely read and understood the text.”

5. Organization of Writing Anchor Standards
Today
Text Types and Purposes
#1. – 3.
Production and Distribution of Writing
#4. – 6.
Research to Build and Present Knowledge
#7. – 9.
Range of Writing
#10
Today
Explain that the Writing Anchor Standards and corresponding grade-specific standards are divided into four sections, and that we will be looking at the first section (Text Types and Purposes) and the third section (Research to Build and Present Knowledge) today.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“The Writing Anchor Standards and corresponding grade-specific standards are organized into four groups. We will look at the first section , which sets out the three purposes or types of writing asked of students, and the third section, which sets out the ways students are asked to use source material.”

6. Text Types & Purposes Writing Anchor Standards
#1 Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
#2 Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization and analysis of content.
#3 Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective technique, well-chosen details, and well-structured event sequences.
Explain that these are the three types of writing students will be asked to become proficient in. Acknowledge that there are other types of writing (poetry, for instance) that teachers may include as part of their writing lessons, but that these are the three types for which all students are expected to meet the standard.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“Here are the three writing types and purposes in the Standards.
Arguments may have many purposes: to change the reader’s point of view, propel the reader to some action, or ask the reader to accept the writer’s explanation or evaluation. It is a reasoned, logical way of demonstrating that the writer’s position, belief, or conclusion is valid.
Informational/explanatory writing includes academic genres such as literary analyses, scientific and historical reports, and summaries as well as functional writing.
Although information is provided in both arguments and explanations, the two types of writing have different aims. Arguments seek to make people believe that something is true or to persuade people to change their beliefs or behavior. Explanations, on the other hand, start with the assumption of truthfulness and answer questions about why or how. Their aim is to make the reader understand rather than to persuade him or her to accept a certain point of view. In short, arguments are used for persuasion and explanations for clarification.

7. Balance of student writing parallels NAEP
Explain that the Common Core State Standards require that the balance of writing students are asked to do parallels the balance assessed on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“The Common Core State Standards ask students to write an increasing proportion of arguments and informational reports from sources as they progress through the grades. Consequently, less classroom time is spent in later grades on personal writing that asks students to detail personal experiences or opinions. The balance of types of writing students are asked to do should parallel the balance assessed on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).
So, by the time students are in high school, analytical writing (writing to argue and explain) has increased from 65% to 80% of their writing experience. We recognize, of course, that these forms of writing are not strictly independent; for example, arguments and explanations often include narrative elements, and both informing and arguing rely on using information or evidence drawn from texts.”

8. Logical argument vs persuasive writing
Both argument and persuasion have as their goal persuading people to believe something is true or change their beliefs or behavior.
Persuasion relies on persuasive strategies.
Appeals to audience’s self interest, sense of identity, emotions, credibility or authority of the writer, etc.
Argument relies on logic.
Convinces audience because of the perceived merit and reasonableness of the claims and proofs offered
Explain that there is a fine but important distinction between logical argument and persuasive writing, even though persuasion is the goal of each. The distinction lies in the appeal each makes: Persuasion may rely on persuasive techniques such as appealing to self interest or emotion. Argument, on the other hand, always relies on a logical case that persuades by convincing the reader of the merits of the claims and proofs.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“In Oregon, we have used the term persuasive mode to describe what in the Standards is called argument. The change in terminology is helpful in distinguishing the salient characteristic that elevates argument: logic.
For instance, when asked to write a short paper “persuading a parent” to do something, we have all seen instances when one or more students will resort to flattery, bargaining, even pleading – which may in fact be very persuasive at home, but certainly does not represent progress toward -- or understanding of -- the ability to write a reasoned, logical argument that is required to be college and career ready.”

9. Activity: Examine Writing Standards 1 - 3
Look at the standards at your grade level for the three types of writing on the handout.
How does the level of difficulty in these CCSS Standards compare with current practice? (What is familiar? Different? Anything new? Dropped?)
How does the level of difficulty in these CCSS Standards compare with grade level expectations based on the previous Oregon ELA Standards?
Invite participants to look at the handout Grade Level Look at Text Types & Purposes 6-12 ELA & Literacy with a partner or two, comparing the CCSS with present practice and/or previous Oregon Writing Standards at their grade level.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“Slide 6 contains the Writing Anchor Standards that represent the college and career readiness level. Let’s take a look at how those are reflected in the various grade-level Standards. With a partner or two, take a few minutes to read and think about Writing Standards 1, 2, and 3 at your grade level. How do they compare with current practice? What do you see that is familiar? What differences or additions?”
Allow a few minutes to work, then invite participants to share their findings.

10. Research to Build & Present Knowledge
Writing Anchor Standards
#7 Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects based on focused questions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
#8 Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and integrate the information while avoiding plagiarism.
#9 Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
Explain that the third category of Writing Anchor Standards (#7, 8, and 9) specifically set expectations for students to write from sources.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“We have looked at the Writing Anchor Standards 1, 2, and 3, which define the types and purposes of writing. The third category, Writing Anchor Standards 7, 8, and 9, specifically set expectations for students to write from sources.
Let’s look at Writing Standard 7 first. Remember that the Anchor Standards describe the college and career readiness level. Let’s look at how Anchor Standards are articulated in the corresponding grade-specific and grade-band standards 6-12.”

11. CCSS Writing Standards 7: grade-band examples
Grades 6 – 8 ELA & Literacy in content areas:
“Conduct short research projects to answer a question…
… drawing on several sources ….”
Grades 9 – 12 ELA & Literacy in content areas:
“Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question … or solve a problem… synthesize multiple sources….”
Explain that the standards are slightly different at each grade level and grade band, with increased sophistication at each stage of the progression. However, they have this element in common at the two grade bands (including the Writing Standards for Literacy in history/social science, science, and technical subjects), specifying multiple sources.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“Writing Standard 7, like all the other CCSS, gradually ‘ramps up’ the level of difficulty at each subsequent grade or grade band. (For instance, at grade 6, students are asked to ‘refocus the inquiry when appropriate’; at grade 7, to generate ‘additional related, focused questions for further research and investigation’; and at grade 8, to include ‘a self-generated question’ that allows for ‘multiple avenues of exploration.’) However, for our purposes today, we want to focus on the shift to writing more short, focused research projects rather than one or two ‘mega-projects’ per year.
Short research projects are defined in the Standards as investigations intended to address a narrowly tailored query in a brief period of time, as in a few class periods or a week of instructional time.
More sustained research projects are defined as investigations intended to address a relatively expansive query using several sources over an extended period of time, as in a few weeks of instructional time.”

12. Extensive practice on short, focused research projects
In addition to more sustained research efforts at higher grades
More typical of the workplace
Allows students to repeat the research process many times and develop the expertise needed to conduct research independently
A progression of shorter research projects also encourages students to develop expertise in one area by confronting and analyzing different aspects of the same topic as well as other texts and source materials on that topic
Explain that the emphasis on short, focused research projects is intended to give students more practice with the entire research process and more experience with projects more typical of the workplace. At the higher grade levels, these are in addition to longer research projects.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“The shift toward more short, focused research projects is intended to give students more practice with the entire research process as well as experience with projects more typical of the workplace. A progression of short, closely related projects also gives students a chance to broaden and deepen their understanding of a topic or issue before undertaking a more sustained, longer term project.
Examples of this are on the ODE website in the resource Suites of Standards-Based Writing Lessons.”
Related online resource “Suites of Standards-Based Writing Lessons” at ODE

13. CCSS Writing Standards 8: grade-specific examples
Grades 6 – 8 ELA & Literacy:
“Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources…
… assess the credibility and accuracy of each source….”
Grades 9 – 12 ELA & Literacy:
“Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources…
… assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of task, purpose, and audience….”
Explain that these grade-specific examples of CCSS Writing Standard 8 have been chosen to emphasize the requirement to write from multiple sources. The full texts of the standards include references to searches, integration of information, and proper citation.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“In CCSS Writing Standard 8 at the various grade levels, we see the centrality of writing from sources. (The full texts of these standards includes references to searches, integration of information, and proper citation as well as increasing the expectations at each grade level/band.) The excerpts displayed here emphasize the expectation that students will use multiple sources in a variety of formats and exercise judgments about those sources.”

14. Writing Anchor Standard 9
Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
ELA 6-12 CCSS Writing Standards 9
“Apply grade [6-12] Reading standards
to literature and
to literary nonfiction.”
Literacy 6-12 CCSS Writing Standards 9
Specifies informational text
Explain that Writing Anchor Standard 9 specifically addresses writing in response to sources. Its corresponding grade-specific and grade band standards require application of Reading Standards to literature and informational text.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“Writing Anchor Standard 9 specifically calls for analytical writing in response to sources.
CCSS Writing Standard 9 in grades 6-12 ELA asks students to apply the grade-specific and grade band Reading Standards to literature and literary nonfiction in order to support analysis, reflection and research included in their writing. In other words, it specifies a written response – either argument or explanation -- to the reading standard. (For example, at grades 9-10, ‘Analyze how an author draws on and transforms source material in a specific work.’)
CCSS Writing Standard 9 for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects specifies informational text, but does not specify application to the Literacy reading standards. However, as we can see in the next slide, the academic responses to the reading standards are likely to be in written form.
One caveat, of course, is that for students to successfully write from sources, they must be able to read the texts with understanding. Resources to support teachers and students can be found in the Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-12 Teachers: Building Comprehension in the Common Core on the ODE website.”
Resources in the Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-12 Teachers: Building Comprehension in the Common Core

15. Grade-Specific Reading Standards related to Writing Standard 9
6th grade ELA (literary nonfiction)
6.RI.8. Trace and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, distinguishing claims that are supported by reasons and evidence from claims that are not.
8th grade ELA (literature)
6.RL.3. Analyze how particular lines of dialogue or incidents in a story or drama propel the action, reveal aspects of a character, or provoke a decision.
9-10th grade Literacy (informational text)
9-10.RH. 9. Compare and contrast treatments of the same topic in several primary and secondary sources.
9-10.RST.8. Assess the extent to which the reasoning and evidence in a text support the author’s claim or recommendation for solving a scientific or technical problem.
Explain that these are a sampling of the Reading standards appropriate for written responses.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“Here are a few examples of grade-specific reading standards requiring argument or explanation.
In writing argument in English language arts, for example, students make claims about the worth or meaning of a literary work, and defend their interpretations or judgments with evidence from the text they are writing about. In history/social studies, students analyze evidence from multiple primary and secondary sources to advance a claim that is best supported by the evidence. In science, students make claims in the form of statements or conclusions that answer questions or address problems, marshalling evidence and drawing on their understanding of scientific concepts to argue in support of their claims.
Or, the writing may be in the form of informative writing, where the explanations are similarly developed and supported with evidence from the text. Informational/ explanatory writing includes a wide variety of forms, such as literary analyses, scientific and historical reports, summaries, and précis writing as well as forms of workplace and functional writing such as instructions, manuals, memos, reports, applications, and resumes.”

16. Activity: Apply Writing Standard 9 to the Reading Standards
Look at the CCSS Reading Standards at your grade level. Identify ones that are appropriate to use for written responses that fit Writing Standard 9.
Come up with prompts specific to texts currently in your curriculum for a few of the CCSS Reading Standards. Try to come up with both argumentative and informative prompts.
Invite participants to work with a partner or two to identify CCSS Reading Standards at their grade level which would be appropriate for fulfilling CCSS Writing Standard 9. Then, suggest they think of prompts specific to texts currently in their curriculum. Allow time to work. Invite participants to share a few of the prompts they generated.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“Working with a partner or two, look at the CCSS Reading Standards for your grade level and identify the ones that Writing Standard 9 could be applied to. Remember, that standard asks students to “Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.”
Next, select a couple of these grade-level Reading Standards and write prompts specific to some of the texts you currently use with students. After completing this task, we’ll take a few minutes to share our examples with one another.”

17. How did we do?
What is meant by the shift toward greater emphasis on writing from sources?
What percentage of classroom time and/or writing experiences should be devoted to analytical writing (argument and explanation) at your grade level? What percentage would we expect to be devoted to narrative?
What are a couple of your current classroom practices that fit the standards for writing from sources?
What changes do you anticipate in your classroom practice to accommodate this shift?
Invite participants to turn to partners to answer the questions.
For instance, the facilitator might say,
“Take a few minutes to reflect on today’s topic by discussing these questions with a partner.”

18. Suggested follow-up activities
In grade level teams, develop lesson(s) around text(s) that call for students to write argument or explanation that will “draw evidence from literary or informational text to support analysis, reflection, and research.”
Read and discuss the writing samples and annotations in Appendix C, which illustrate the criteria required to meet the CCSS for particular types of writing at a given grade.
View the related online resource “Suites of Standards- Based Writing Lessons” on the ODE website at .
Suggest the activities listed as possible follow-ups to this session.
Invite participants to fill out the Reflections page.