Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMatthew Wiggins Modified over 6 years ago
1
Velocities in ITRF – not appropriate for interpretation
2
Velocities in NUVEL-1A – better, but SNARF will be even better!
3
The SCEC 3.0 velocity field
4
Elastic Rebound Earthquake! Earthquake!
5
Elastic Rebound Earthquake! Earthquake!
6
Elastic Rebound Earthquake! SF 1906 Guatemala 1976 Kobe 1995
Earthquake! Kobe 1995
7
The SCEC 3.0 velocity field
8
The SCEC 3.0 velocity field
9
Vertical Velocities: Not dominated by tectonics! GIA is the issue.
10
GIA Predicted Velocities: Very sensitive to model parameters
11
The SCEC 3.0 velocity field
12
GPS Data Analysis GIPSY-OASIS 2.5 [Zumberge et al. 1997]
JPL Precise Orbits ITRF-97 Atmospheric & ionospheric models Error Analysis [Mao et al. 1999] Position Uncertainties (mean) 3, 6 & 12 mm Rate Uncertainties (mean) – 1.0, 1.3 & 2.5 mm/a Coseismic Offset Eruption
13
Co-Seismic Offsets (Model from InSAR & local GPS)
Co-Seismic offsets from June 17 & 21, 2000 earthquakes [Pedersen et al., 2003] [Pedersen et al., 2003]
14
Co-Seismic Corrected June 17 & 21, 2000 SISZ earthquakes
Distributed slip model [Pedersen et al., 2003] Correct positions for offsets, recalculate time series Residual = Feb. 28 – March 6, 2000 Hekla eruption
15
Hekla Deformation
16
Co-Seismic Corrected June 17 & 21, 2000 SISZ earthquakes
Distributed slip model [Pedersen et al., 2003] Correct positions for offsets, recalculate time series Residual = Feb. 28 – March 6, 2000 Hekla eruption
17
Co-Seismic Corrected Velocity field corrected for co-seismic offsets
Residual equals deformation from volcanic eruptions and inflation events
18
Velocity Field Relative to Stable North America
Overall plate motion parallel velocity field June 17 & 21, 2000 earthquakes Hengill effects
19
The SCEC 3.0 velocity field
20
Normalized observed velocity field (in the PoD spherical coordinate system)
The velocity transformation allows us to examine the velocity field by a single quantity - the magnitude of the longitudinal velocity (Vf). Vertical lines mark the orientation of small circles about the PoD. Horizontal lines mark the boundaries between 10 segments of similar velocity transition Velocities are normalized by 0.64°/Myr.
21
Velocity and velocity gradient of all segments
22
Maximum horizontal shear
23
Relation between seismicity and interseismic deformation
25
Earthquake Cycle Thatcher 1986
28
Rate on a fault: How much displacement is accomodated
On that feature for a given time. Geologic rate: Distance between offset feature/Time Geodetic rate: The amount of deformation imposed in the Model to fit the geodetic data
29
Example of Geologic rate
30
Seismicity Up to now we have assumed linear behavior of the movement
of the observed point Lecture 6 May 24th 2005
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.