1. Tree Indices Chapter 11

2. Job Interview Question

3. B+-tree indices are an alternative to indexed-sequential files.
B+-Tree Index Files
B+-tree indices are an alternative to indexed-sequential files.
Disadvantage of indexed-sequential files
performance degrades as file grows, since many overflow blocks get created.
Periodic reorganization of entire file is required.
Advantage of B+-tree index files:
automatically reorganizes itself with small, local, changes, in the face of insertions and deletions.
Reorganization of entire file is not required to maintain performance.
(Minor) disadvantage of B+-trees:
extra insertion and deletion overhead, space overhead.
Advantages of B+-trees outweigh disadvantages
B+-trees are used extensively

4. Example of B+-Tree

5. B+-Tree Index Files (Cont.)
A B+-tree is a rooted tree satisfying the following properties:
All paths from root to leaf are of the same length
Each node that is not a root or a leaf has between n/2 and n children (pointers).
n is given and is the same for all nodes.
n is called the order of the tree.
Some books refer to n/2 as the order of the tree.
A leaf node has between (n–1)/2 and n–1 values
Special cases:
If the root is not a leaf, it has at least 2 children.
If the root is a leaf (that is, there are no other nodes in the tree), it can have between 0 and (n–1) values.

6. B+-Tree Node Structure
Typical node
Ki are the search-key values
Pi are pointers to children (for non-leaf nodes) or pointers to records or buckets of records (for leaf nodes).
The search-keys in a node are ordered
K1 < K2 < K3 < < Kn–1
(Initially assume no duplicate keys, address duplicates later)

7. Properties of a leaf node:
Leaf Nodes in B+-Trees
Properties of a leaf node:
For i = 1, 2, . . ., n–1, pointer Pi points to a file record with search-key value Ki,
If Li, Lj are leaf nodes and i < j, Li’s search-key values are less than or equal to Lj’s search-key values
Pn points to next leaf node in search-key order

8. Non-Leaf Nodes in B+-Trees
Non leaf nodes form a multi-level sparse index on the leaf nodes. For a non-leaf node with m pointers:
All the search-keys in the subtree to which P1 points are less than K1
For 2  i  n – 1, all the search-keys in the subtree to which Pi points have values greater than or equal to Ki–1 and less than Ki
All the search-keys in the subtree to which Pn points have values greater than or equal to Kn–1

9. B+-tree for instructor file (n = 6 pointers → n – 1 = 5 keys (values))
Example of B+-tree
B+-tree for instructor file (n = 6 pointers → n – 1 = 5 keys (values))
Leaf nodes must have between 3 and 5 values ((n–1)/2 and n –1, with n = 6).
Non-leaf nodes other than root must have between 3 and 6 children ((n/2 and n with n =6).
Root must have at least 2 children.

10. Observations about B+-trees
Since the inter-node connections are done by pointers, “logically” close blocks need not be “physically” close.
The non-leaf levels of the B+-tree form a hierarchy of sparse indices.
The B+-tree contains a relatively small number of levels
Level below root has at least 2* n/2 values
Next level has at least 2* n/2 * n/2 values
.. etc.
If there are K search-key values in the file, the tree height is no more than  logn/2(K)
thus searches can be conducted efficiently.
Insertions and deletions to the main file can be handled efficiently, as the index can be restructured in logarithmic time.

11. Queries on B+-Trees Find record with search-key value V. C=root
While C is not a leaf node {
Let i be least value s.t. V  Ki.
If no such exists, set C = last non-null pointer in C
Else { if (V= Ki ) Set C = Pi +1 else set C = Pi} }
Let i be least value s.t. Ki = V
If there is such a value i, follow pointer Pi to the desired record.
Else no record with search-key value k exists.

12. Queries on B+-Trees (Cont.)
If there are K search-key values in the file, the height of the tree is no more than logn/2(K).
A node is generally the same size as a disk block, typically 4 kilobytes
and n is typically around 100 (40 bytes per index entry).
With 1 million search key values and n = 100
at most log50(1,000,000) = 4 nodes are accessed in a lookup.
Contrast this with a balanced binary tree with 1 million search key values — around 20 nodes are accessed in a lookup
above difference is significant since every node access may need a disk I/O, costing around 20 milliseconds

13. B+ Trees in Practice Typical order: 100. Typical fill-factor: 67%.
average fanout = 133
Typical capacities:
Height 4: 1334 = 312,900,700 records
Height 3: 1333 = 2,352,637 records
Can often hold top levels in buffer pool:
Level 1 = page = Kbytes
Level 2 = pages = Mbyte
Level 3 = 17,689 pages = 133 MBytes

14. Updates on B+-Trees: Insertion
Find the leaf node in which the search-key value would appear
If the search-key value is already present in the leaf node
Add record to the file
If necessary add a pointer to the bucket.
If the search-key value is not present, then
add the record to the main file (and create a bucket if necessary)
If there is room in the leaf node, insert (key-value, pointer) pair in the leaf node
Otherwise, split the node (along with the new (key-value, pointer) entry) as discussed in the next slide.

15. Updates on B+-Trees: Insertion (Cont.)
Splitting a leaf node:
take the n (search-key value, pointer) pairs (including the one being inserted) in sorted order. Place the first n/2 in the original node, and the rest in a new node.
let the new node be p, and let k be the least key value in p. Insert (k,p) in the parent of the node being split.
If the parent is full, split it and propagate the split further up.
Splitting of nodes proceeds upwards till a node that is not full is found.
In the worst case the root node may be split increasing the height of the tree by 1.
Result of splitting node containing Brandt, Califieri and Crick on inserting Adams
Next step: insert entry with (Califieri,pointer-to-new-node) into parent

16. B+-Tree before and after insertion of “Adams”
B+-Tree Insertion
B+-Tree before and after insertion of “Adams”

17. B+-Tree before and after insertion of “Lamport”
B+-Tree Insertion
Insert “Lamport”
B+-Tree before and after insertion of “Lamport”

18. Insertion in B+-Trees (Cont.)
Splitting a non-leaf node: when inserting (k,p) into an already full internal node N
Copy N to an in-memory area M with space for n+1 pointers and n keys
Insert (k,p) into M
Copy P1,K1, …, K n/2-1,P n/2 from M back into node N
Copy Pn/2+1,K n/2+1,…,Kn,Pn+1 from M into newly allocated node N’
Insert (K n/2,N’) into parent N
Read pseudocode in book!
Califieri
Adams Brandt Califieri Crick
Adams Brandt
Crick

19. Example B+ Tree - Inserting 15*
Root 13 17 24 30 2* 3* 5* 7*
14*
16*
19*
20*
22*
24*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39*
14*
15*
16*
Dose not violates the 50% rule 13

20. Example B+ Tree - Inserting 8*
Root 13 17 24 30 2* 3* 5* 7*
14*
16*
19*
20*
22*
24*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39* 2* 3* 5* 7* 8*
Violate the 50% rule, split the leaf. 13

21. Example B+ Tree - Inserting 8*
Violate the 50% rule, split the internal node.
Root 7 13 17 24 30 2* 3* 5*
14*
16*
19*
20*
22*
24*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39* 7* 8* 13

22. Example B+ Tree After Inserting 8*
Root 17 5 13 24 30 2* 3* 5* 7* 8*
14*
16*
19*
20*
22*
24*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39*
Notice that root was split, leading to increase in height.
In this example, we can avoid split by re-distributing entries; however, this is usually not done in practice. 13

23. Updates on B+-Trees: Deletion
Find the record to be deleted, and remove it
If the node has too few entries due to the removal, and the entries in the node and a sibling fit into a single node, then merge siblings:
Insert all the search-key values in the two nodes into a single node (the one on the left), and delete the other node.
Delete the pair (Ki–1, Pi), where Pi is the pointer to the deleted node, from its parent, recursively using the above procedure.

24. Updates on B+-Trees: Deletion
Otherwise, if the node has too few entries due to the removal, but the entries in the node and a sibling do not fit into a single node, then redistribute pointers:
Redistribute the pointers between the node and a sibling such that both have more than the minimum number of entries.
Update the corresponding search-key value in the parent of the node.
The node deletions may cascade upwards till a node which has n/2 or more pointers is found.
If the root node has only one pointer after deletion, it is deleted and the sole child becomes the root.
Rule of Thumb:
First attempt must be redistribution. It is cheaper!
Then, merge.

25. Example Tree (including 8*) Delete 19* and 20* ...
Root 17 5 13 24 30 2* 3* 5* 7* 8*
14*
16*
19*
20*
22*
24*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39* 15

26. Example Tree (including 8*) After 19* is Deleted. Delete 20
Root 17 5 13 24 30 2* 3* 5* 7* 8*
14*
16*
20*
22*
24*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39*
Deleting 19* is easy. 15

27. Example Tree (including 8*) Delete 20*
Root 17 5 13 24 30 2* 3* 5* 7* 8*
14*
16*
22*
24*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39*
Underflow! → Redistribute.
Violation of the 50% rule 15

28. Example Tree After (Inserting 8*, Then) Deleting 19* and 20* ...
Root 17 5 13 27 30 2* 3* 5* 7* 8*
14*
16*
22*
24*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39*
Deleting 20* is done with re-distribution. Notice how the lowest key is copied up. 15

29. ... And Then Deleting 24* Underflow! Can we do redistribution? MERGE!
Root 17 5 13 27 30 2* 3* 5* 7* 8*
14*
16*
22*
24*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39*
Underflow!
Can we do redistribution?
MERGE! 15

30. ... And Then Deleting 24* Must merge.
Observe `toss’ of index entry (on right), and `pull down’ of index entry (below). 30
22*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39*
Root 5 13 17 30 2* 3* 5* 7* 8*
14*
16*
22*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39* 16

31. Example of Non-leaf Re-distribution
Tree is shown below during deletion of 24*.
In contrast to previous example, can re-distribute entry from left child of root to right child.
Root 22 5 13 17 20 30
14*
16*
17*
18*
20*
33*
34*
38*
39*
22*
27*
29*
21* 7* 5* 8* 3* 2* 17

32. After Re-distribution
Intuitively, entries are re-distributed by `pushing through’ the splitting entry in the parent node.
It suffices to re-distribute index entry with key 20.
Root 20 5 13 17 22 30 2* 3* 5* 7* 8*
14*
16*
17*
18*
20*
21*
22*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39* 18

33. After Re-distribution
Intuitively, entries are re-distributed by `pushing through’ the splitting entry in the parent node.
We’ve re-distributed 17 as well for illustration.
Root 17 5 13 20 22 30 2* 3* 5* 7* 8*
14*
16*
17*
18*
20*
21*
22*
27*
29*
33*
34*
38*
39* 18

34. Another Examples of B+-Tree Deletion
Violation of the 50% rule
Before and after deleting “Srinivasan”
Underflow! → Redistribute
Cannot Redistribute → Merge
Deleting “Srinivasan” causes merging of under-full leaves

35. Indexing Strings Variable length strings as keys Variable fanout
Use space utilization as criterion for splitting, not number of pointers
Prefix compression
Key values at internal nodes can be prefixes of full key
Keep enough characters to distinguish entries in the subtrees separated by the key value
E.g. “Silas” and “Silberschatz” can be separated by “Silb”
Keys in leaf node can be compressed by sharing common prefixes

36. Bulk Loading and Bottom-Up Build
Inserting entries one-at-a-time into a B+-tree requires  1 IO per entry
assuming leaf level does not fit in memory
can be very inefficient for loading a large number of entries at a time (bulk loading)
Efficient alternative 1:
sort entries first
insert in sorted order
insertion will go to existing page (or cause a split)
much improved IO performance, but most leaf nodes half full
Efficient alternative 2: Bottom-up B+-tree construction
As before sort entries
And then create tree layer-by-layer, starting with leaf level
Implemented as part of bulk-load utility by most database systems

37. Bulk Loading of a B+ Tree: Alternative 23* 4* 6* 9*
10*
11*
12*
13*
20*
22*
23*
31*
35*
36*
38*
41*
44*
Sorted pages of data entries; not yet in B+ tree
Root 3* 4* 6* 9*
10*
11*
12*
13*
20*
22*
23*
31*
35*
36*
38*
41*
44*
Sorted pages of data entries; not yet in B+ tree
Root 6 20

38. Bulk Loading of a B+ Tree
Root
Sorted pages of data entries; not yet in B+ tree 6 10 3* 4* 6* 9*
10*
11*
12*
13*
20*
22*
23*
31*
35*
36*
38*
41*
44* 20

39. Bulk Loading (Contd.)
Root 10 20
Index entries for leaf pages always entered into right-most index page just above leaf level. When this fills up, it splits. (Split may go up right-most path to the root.)
Much faster than repeated inserts, especially when one considers locking!
Data entry pages 6 12 23 35
not yet in B+ tree 3* 4* 6* 9*
10*
11*
12*
13*
20*
22*
23*
31*
35*
36*
38*
41*
44* 3* 4* 6* 9*
10*
11*
12*
13*
20*
22*
23*
31*
35*
36*
38*
41*
44* 6
Root 10 12 23 20 35 38
not yet in B+ tree
Data entry pages 21

40. Animation

41. Indices on Multiple Keys
Composite search keys are search keys containing more than one attribute
E.g. (dept_name, salary)
Lexicographic ordering: (a1, a2) < (b1, b2) if either
a1 < b1, or
a1=b1 and a2 < b2

42. Indices on Multiple Attributes
Suppose we have an index on combined search-key
(dept_name, salary).
With the where clause where dept_name = “Finance” and salary = the index on (dept_name, salary) can be used to fetch only records that satisfy both conditions.
Using separate indices is less efficient — we may fetch many records (or pointers) that satisfy only one of the conditions.
Can also efficiently handle where dept_name = “Finance” and salary < 80000
But cannot efficiently handle where dept_name < “Finance” and balance = 80000
May fetch many records that satisfy the first but not the second condition