Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJessica Charles Modified over 6 years ago
1
University of Wisconsin & NASH TS3: Redesigning the Math Pathway Madison January 18 2017
2
Redesigning the Math Pathway recognizes the importance of getting students to pass credit-bearing courses Redesigning the Math Pathway What’s exciting Innovative approaches to math entry-level Growing consensus that not every college student needs algebra Need to redesign the pathway to STEM majors as well What are the challenges? Faculty buy-in is particularly critical Math pathways at 2-yr institutions need to transfer to 4-yrs Aims statements were developed for each of the interventions after considering opportunities, challenges and evidence AIM: “Our aim is to, within a certain number of years, to appropriately increase the number of students who complete their credit-bearing gateway math course, differentiated by career aspirations, in their first 30 credits.”
3
The Co-requisite Model in the Tennessee Board of Regents Universities and Community Colleges
Dr. Randy Schulte Associate Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Tennessee Board of Regents
4
Prerequisite Remediation
Q: What % of community college students with under 19 ACT passed a credit-bearing college level Math class in their first year of college? WORD PROBLEM
5
Prerequisite Remediation
WORD PROBLEM
6
Completion of Gateway Math by ACT Sub-score Community College Pre-requisite Model vs. Co-requisite Pilots
7
Co-requisite Remediation
PILOT Mathematics 9 Community Colleges 1019 students
8
Completion of Gateway Math by ACT Sub-score Community College Pre-requisite Model vs. Co-requisite Pilots
9
Co-requisite Remediation
Full System Implementation Fall 2015
10
Completion of Gateway Math by ACT Sub-score Community College Pre-requisite Model vs. Co-requisite Model 9479 Students 7422 Students
11
Remediation at Roane State Community College Prior to Fall 2015
Emporium Model Self-paced, based on MyMathLab 5 Modules with options to complete in one or two semesters Markus
12
Prerequisite Remediation Pipeline
Students with ACT< 19 Prerequisite Remediation Pipeline Leaky N=805 MATH 0891 MATH 1530 Complete 29% Pass 14% Markus MATH 0892 MATH 1530 Incomplete 25 % Pass 18% Pass 6% Withdraw/Fail Don’t return Withdraw/Fail Withdraw/Fail Don’t return Withdraw/Fail Success! 375/805 46% 63/805 7.8% 55/805 6.8% 51/806 6.1% 62/805 7.7% 46/805 4.5% 20% Course Repetitions 2.2%
13
Roane State Community College Co-Requisite Remediation Pipeline
Students with ACT< 19 Students with ACT 19 N = 564 N = 468 Markus MATH 1530 MATH 1530 & MATH 0530 Success! Success! 58% 65% Withdraw/Fail 42 % Withdraw/Fail 35 %
14
Completion of Gateway Math by ACT Sub-score University “MATH1000” Model vs. Co-requisite Model
3335 Students 2803 Students
15
Co-requisite Remediation
Disaggregation
16
Completion of Gateway Math by ACT Sub-score Community College Pre-requisite Model vs. Co-requisite Model
17
Completion of Gateway Math by ACT Sub-score Community College Pre-requisite Model vs. Co-requisite Model
18
Completion of Gateway Math by ACT Sub-score Community College Pre-requisite Model vs. Co-requisite Model
19
Completion of Gateway Math by ACT Sub-score University Pre-requisite Model vs. Co-requisite Model
20
Strategies for System-wide Implementation
MATHEMATICS COREQUISITE MODEL Strategies for System-wide Implementation
21
REALIGNMENT OF MATHEMATICS PATHWAYS
Now affirmed by the Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences
22
System-wide Collaboration
Mathematics Academic Leaders and Discipline-specific Faculty Tennessee Transfer Pathways curricula development and revision Markus
23
Gateway Math Class Distribution
24
Completion of Gateway Math by ACT Sub-score Disaggregated by Mathematics Course
25
Data Analytics, Collaboration, Planning
MATHEMATICS Corequisite Academies Data Analytics, Collaboration, Planning
26
System-wide One-day Meetings
3-Person Teams of Mathematics Academic Leaders and Faculty Review of results system-wide Presentations by high-performing campus teams Markus
27
System-wide One-day Meetings
Inter-institutional group work on key going to scale and continuous improvement factors Pedagogy Scheduling Staffing Technology Outreach Support Markus
28
System-wide One-day Meetings
Planning Template for each institutional team Institution-specific data Due date for completed templates Markus
29
Related Data Points
30
Average Community College Instructional Cost
per Successful Student in Mathematics Pre-requisite Model Co-requisite Model Is Corequisite Remediation Cost-Effective? Early Findings From Tennessee Belfield, Davis & Lahr, Community College Research Center, Columbia University
31
University students who passed a Math class in their 1st Year
8% Pre-requisite Model Co-requisite Model Pre-requisite Model Co-requisite Model
32
Community College students who passed a Math class in their 1st Year
33% 18% Pre-requisite Model Co-requisite Model Pre-requisite Model Co-requisite Model
33
Questions…
34
For More Information: Dr. Tristan Denley
Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs Tennessee Board of Regents
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.