Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLorena Ray Modified over 6 years ago
1
Opening Access, Increasing Success, and Confronting Inequity: The Case for Establishing Co-Reqs and Multiple Measures Placement in Transfer-level Math and English Tammi Marshall, Cuyamaca College, Math Josh Scott, Solano College, English ASCCC Curriculum Institute July 14, 2017
2
The call for co-requisite models and placement reform
Endorsed by The Community College Research Center The American Association of Community Colleges Jobs for the Future The Education Commission of the States The National Association of Developmental Education The University of Texas’ Charles A. Dana Center The Basic Skills Student Outcomes Transformation Grant The National Center for Inquiry The California Acceleration Project As part of it’s Graduation Initiative 2025, CSU is implementing multiple measures placement and co-requisite remediation Finally, both the CCCCO and ACCJC argue for disaggregation of equity data as a tool for course assessment and outcome review/revision 2 min Letting go of ELM and moving towards multiple measures The point about IGETC ... the IGETC Standards version 1.8 were approved by ICAS (Intersegmental Council of Academic Senates) in June Below is the relevant excerpt (10.2 Subject Area 2A: Mathematical Concepts and Quantitative Reasoning). Someone in the audience (Ginny May?) may speak to this. The Mathematical Concepts and Quantitative Reasoning requirement shall be fulfilled by completion of a one-term course in mathematics or statistics above the level of intermediate algebra, with a stated course prerequisite of intermediate algebra. Courses outside the discipline of math using the application of statistics may be used to fulfill this requirement, as long as the course has intermediate algebra as a prerequisite and knowledge of intermediate algebra is necessary to be successful. Until 2019, math courses with prerequisites of intermediate algebra OR courses that satisfy the UCTCA Guidelines for Statistics and are approved by CSU per the Statistics Pathway memo of October 2015 are acceptable to fulfill the quantitative reasoning requirement.
3
Cuyamaca college: Where we were vs where we are now
15 min
4
Basic Skills Math Transformation Cuyamaca
Traditional Curriculum - Placement Three levels below transfer-level Math 24% of students in fall 2015 had immediate access to transfer-level math Disproportionate Impact White students 3 times as likely to have access to transfer-level math as Blacks (27% vs. 9%) White students 1.3 times as likely to have access to transfer-level math as Hispanics (27% vs. 21%)
5
Basic Skills Math Transformation Cuyamaca
Traditional Curriculum - Success Completion of Transfer-Level Math within 2 years (fall 2013 cohort) Students placed 1 level below: 36% Students placed 2 levels below: 19% Students placed 3 levels below: 4% Disproportionate Impact (success within 2 years of a transfer-level math course if placed one or more levels below transfer – fall 2013 cohort) White students 2.7 times as likely to succeed in transfer-level math within 2 years as Blacks (16% vs. 6%)
6
Basic Skills Math Transformation Cuyamaca
Accelerated Curriculum - Placement Intermediate Algebra (one level below transfer) is lowest placement possible 84% of students have immediate access to transfer-level math (vs 24%) regular and co-requisite models combined Disproportionate Impact White, Black, and Hispanic students have comparable access to transfer-level math (84% vs 73% vs 85%) Black students access to transfer-level math is eight times greater Hispanic students access to transfer-level math is four times greater
7
Basic Skills Math Transformation Cuyamaca
Accelerated Curriculum – Success Completion of Transfer-Level Math (Overall) One semester completion tripled (84 in fall 2014 to 257 in fall 2016) Course success rates held steady (transfer-level math: 64% vs transfer-level math with co-requisite: 69%) One year throughput rates for first-time math students placed below transfer-level went from 10% to 67% Completion of Transfer-Level Math Based on Placement (revised vs traditional) Students placed 1 level below: 66% in one year (vs 36% in two years) Students placed 2 levels below: 70% in one year (vs 19% in two years) Students placed 3 levels below: 56% in one year (vs 4% in two years)
8
Basic Skills Math Transformation Cuyamaca
Accelerated Curriculum – Success Equity Impact (Completion of a transfer-level math course within 1 year of the first enrollment) Black students success increased 9 times (55% vs 6%) Hispanic students success increased over 4 times (65% vs 15%) No disproportionate impact for Hispanics (before or after) Disproportionate impact for blacks cut in half (2.7 to 1.4) White student success is 76%
9
Basic Skills Math Transformation Cuyamaca
Accelerated Curriculum – Completion Data (PreStats to Stats) Completion within 3 years (Transfer; Degree; Certificate) Students placed 1 level below: 13% (vs 15%) Students placed 2 levels below: 29% (vs 11%) Students placed 3 levels below: 37% (vs 7%) Disproportionate Impact Black: 31% (vs 14%) Hispanic: 32% (vs 10%) White: 42% (vs 14%) Black students completion doubled (31% vs 14%) Hispanic students completion tripled (32% vs 10%) Often people wonder what will happen and there is a strategy we have been using for over 3 years in which we can look at to help us see that this type of change works
10
Student Survey An electronic survey was sent to all students enrolled in a course with support and the same course in the traditional mode Students enrolled in concurrent support courses were significantly more likely to… feel were more comfortable making mistakes in class agree the course provided them with more opportunities to receive guidance from other students believe the instructor did a good job of managing the classroom feel the in-class activities helped them master the course material and complete homework Overall response rate of 28%
11
Solano college: Where we were vs where we are now
15 min
12
Basic Skills English Transformation at Solano
Traditional Curriculum Three levels below college English 18% of students had immediate access to college English 28% of English 1 students were first-semester Completion of College English within 2 years: Students placed 1 level below: 43% Students placed 2 levels below: 27% Students placed 3 levels below: 7% Disproportionate Impact on Students of Color: White students 2 times as likely to have access to college English as African-Americans (29% vs. 14%)
13
Basic Skills English Transformation at Solano
Revised Curriculum One level below college is lowest placement possible Over 80% of students have immediate access to college English (regular and co-requisite models combined) 53% of English 1/w/co-req students are first-semester (in Fall ‘16; we expect this will increase in Fall ‘17) Completion of College English within 1 year: College English (stand-alone): 71% Co-Requisite Model: 68% Students placed in old 1 level below: 31% Disproportionate Impact on Students of Color: White and African-American students have comparable access to college English (84% vs 68%). In the first semester, two instructors also taught a “standard” English 1, and in both cases the English 1 with a co-req had a slightly higher pass rate than our stand-alone English 1 classes, despite the fact that the students in the co-req were assessed at one-level-below transfer.
14
Impact on Equity In old sequence, African American students placed one level below transfer had a 32% chance of passing English 1 within a year In Fall 2016, African American students enrolled in English 1/310D had a 67% pass rate.
15
Results of English Placement Reforms
Previously students needed a 102 on Accuplacer to get into transfer-level English (English 1). 18% of incoming students had access. Fall 2016: English 1: 90 on Accuplacer OR a 2.7 HS GPA, OR a B in Junior/Senior year English. English 1/310D: Accuplacer OR 2.3 GPA or C in Junior/Senior English 35% had access to English 1 and 37% more to co-req on decreased cut score alone; Based on Multiple Measures Placement, 94% of incoming students who report GPA now qualify for English 1 or 1/310D* Results: Pass rates in English 1 remained stable (76% vs 72%). *Based off of the 56.5% of students who applied within CCCApply and that answered the supplemental questions (October 2016-April 2017)
16
The need for multiple measures
3 MIN Here is a link to a fact sheet on AB 705
17
John Hett’s 2015 Presentation on LBCC Multiple Measures Research
Five cohorts tracking more than 7,000 HS grads who matriculate to LBCC directly Examined predictive utility of wide range of high school achievement data For predicting: How students are assessed and placed How students perform in those classes (and alignment between them) Highly simplified presentation of unstandardized ordinal and logistic regression Lots more too it and RP has posted a lot of it
18
* p <.05 **, p <.01, *** p<.001, x = p< 1 x 10-10
Alignment in English (unstandardized ordinal and logistic regression coefficients) High school, course you took, A-G classes, more. What’s more important than 11th or 12th grade English – Math CST score – almost as strong as overall GPA. Most important predictor of performance – what course you took – after that – it’s your overall GPA. * p <.05 **, p <.01, *** p<.001, x = p< 1 x 10-10
19
* p <.05 **, p <.01, *** p<.001, x = p< 1 x 10-10
Alignment in Math Math much more complicated than this – the last course you took/which CST matters a lot in performance as does the difficulty level of the which course you take. * p <.05 **, p <.01, *** p<.001, x = p< 1 x 10-10
20
How did we get there? Cuyamaca college
10 min
21
Process timeline Spring 2015 – Department voted to adopt multiple measures & create co-req classes Summer 2015 – Wrote course outlines for co-req courses Fall 2015 – After looking at more statewide data, decided to lower cut scores and use MM placement; co-reqs approved by Curriculum Committee Spring 2016 – Worked on instructional manuals (lesson planning); information campaign; training with counselors Fall 2016 – Offered scaled up version of Math Pathways (no more math below Intermediate Algebra) Fall 2017 – Offering Intermediate Algebra for English Learners linked with an ESL course
22
Math Pathways One- or Two-course Sequences
All students into a Math Pathway by Area of Interest STEM; Business; General Education; CTE; Education Broadened access to transfer-level by using MMAP rules to place students into co-requisite Statistics College Algebra PreCalculus Business Calculus 5 CAP Design Principles Backwards design from the college-level course A thinking oriented curriculum Low stakes collaborative practice Just-in-time remediation Attention to the affective domain
23
Math Pathways One- or Two-course Sequences
No math below Intermediate Algebra; some students placed into Intermediate Algebra with co-requisite Some students go into Pre-Statistics
24
Schedule Changes Fall 2015 Fall 2016 Fall 2017 Two+ Levels Below 18
N/A Pre-Statistics 3 4 One Level Below 15 19 Transfer Level 29 37 54
25
Information Campaign Presentations in all classes below Intermediate Algebra regarding changes in spring 2016 Posters placed around campus to encourage students to come and get reevaluated and take their math now Counselors encouraged to have students re-assess when coming in for appointments
26
Additional Support via BSSOT Grant
Creating Lessons Professional Development Conferences Workshops Meetings before implementation Meetings during implementation Job Shadow Program
27
How did we get there? Solano college
10 min
28
Process timeline Fall 2014 – Department voted to create co-req for English 1 w/higher cut score Summer 2015 – After looking at more state-wide data, we decided to lower cut scores/MM placement (detail on next slide) Fall 2015 – Experimental co-req approved by Curriculum Committee Spring 2016 – Offered 3 sections of English 1/310D (co-req) as an experimental class Fall 2016 – Offering 7 sections, including a Puente section and a section devoted to Multilingual (ESL) writers Spring 2017 – Co-req class is now only option for eligible students
29
Where we are now All students placed one-level-below enroll in college English with extra support Nothing below accelerated English class 3 sections in Spring 2016, 7 sections in Fall 2016, 12 sections in Spring 2017 Uses regular English 1 assignments Just-in-time remediation of foundational skills Increased scaffolding on reading and writing Supplemental Instructor during all class hours 18% enroll in accelerated English
30
Placement Reform Information Campaign
For students who already received an education plan, and thus, placement into a math and/or English course, but who may not have begun those courses yet: Posters have been placed around campus to encourage students to come and get reevaluated Faculty were asked to read a message to their classes with the same message as the posters.
31
Additional Support via Transformation Grant
Supplemental Instruction Brochures created Job description being developed Graduate students working in English 1 with co-req Graduate students being recruited for Intermediate Algebra for fall 2017 and Statistics for spring 2018
32
Moving from concept to scale
10 min
33
Moving from Concept to Scale
Understand and accept change Student capacity Broaden access by changing placement Faculty advocate Someone has to own it, water it, feed it, and make it grow Counseling Early & often
34
Moving from Concept to Scale
Broad dissemination of evidence Recruit allies from appropriate college constituencies Working on curriculum redesign How many and who? How long does this take? Compensation? What to include…
35
Moving from Concept to Scale
Schedule changes Develop strategies for directing students to the correct path (math) Math Pathways via Area of Interest Marketing Information Systems
36
Thank You! Tammi Marshall Chair, Math Department Cuyamaca College Joshua Scott Basic Skills Coordinator English Department Solano College
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.