Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MKTG 450 Selected Topic in Marketing: Distribution Management Spring 2009, Dr. Stefan Wuyts Vertical integration.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MKTG 450 Selected Topic in Marketing: Distribution Management Spring 2009, Dr. Stefan Wuyts Vertical integration."— Presentation transcript:

1 MKTG 450 Selected Topic in Marketing: Distribution Management Spring 2009, Dr. Stefan Wuyts Vertical integration

2 Structure: Channel functions 1. Channel Management Channel design
Vertical integration Contracts Partnerships Dark sides Power Connectivity and control 1. Channel Management Retailing Private labels Retail assortments Cooperation in retail Pricing Price promotions 2. Retail Management New trends Collaboration and competition in retail 3. New insights

3 Topics Outsourcing versus vertical integration Transaction Cost Theory
* Relationship-specific investments * External uncertainty * Internal uncertainty (Readings: Book chapter 7)

4 How to coordinate a marketing channel?
Vertical integration Outsourcing Contracts Partnerships

5 The ‘make-or-buy’ decision How does the work get done?
Vertical integration Outsourcing A third party does it How does the work get done? You do it Their people Their money Their risk Their responsibility Your people Your money Your risk Your responsibility The costs Their gain or loss The benefits Your gain or loss

6 Forward vs. backward MANUFACTURER DISTRIBUTORS END USERS forward

7 An important decision Vertical integration …
is difficult to implement successfully is difficult to reverse has serious financial consequences

8 Why vertical integration? Transaction cost theory (TCT)
Economic theory that explains when activities (e.g., distribution functions) should be integrated vs. outsourced (market contracting) Criterium: Efficiency = revenues – variable costs fixed costs Choose outsourcing unless EfficiencyVertical Integration > EfficiencyOutsourcing

9 TCT: Outsourcing as the default
Outsourcing as the default: outsourcing is more efficient because of the benefits of competition 5 advantages of outsourcing 1. Motivation A third party has stronger incentives to perform because it (a) wants to make a profit and (b) is easy to replace 2. Specialization 3. ‘Survival of the economically fittest’ 4. Economies of scale 5. Heavier market coverage

10 But then … Why not always outsource?
“Market failure” Relationship-specific investments External uncertainty Vertical integration Internal uncertainty

11 Relationship specific investments (1)
Definition Distributor investments that are tailored to a particular manufacturer and that cannot be easily redeployed outside the relationship Five types Site specificity Physical asset specificity Dedicated asset specificity Human asset specificity Goodwill asset specificity (“brand equity”)

12 Relationship specific investments (2)
Site specificity = Investments in a location close to a manufacturer and far from other manufacturers Physical asset specificity = Distributor investments in e.g. machinery, equipment, computer systems that are difficult to redeploy to another relationship Dedicated asset specificity = Expansion of distribution capacity just for one specific manufacturer and that by itself represents overcapacity

13 Relationship specific investments (3)
Human asset specificity = Distributor investments in knowledge that cannot be readily redeployed to another relationship Remark: industry knowledge in general Goodwill asset specificity = Brand equity that is largely created by distributors  brand equity independent of distributors’ actions (= power of manufacturer over distributors)

14 Problem caused by relationship specific investments
Relationship-specific investments cause a market to be no longer perfectly competitive  Distributors cannot be replaced easily/cost-free  Distributors can behave opportunistically1 e.g. - perform worse - ask higher compensation for the same level of performance - cheat  Manufacturer wants to avoid this 1 Self-interest seeking in a deceitful or dishonest manner

15 Solution for this problem
Vertical integration1  More control over employees than over independent parties  Less opportunistic behavior 1 Or extensive contracting or partnerships … see later

16 Vertical integration: When?
Relationship specific investments External uncertainty Vertical integration Internal uncertainty

17 External uncertainty Definition
= Uncertainty w.r.t. circumstances that can occur in the environment = An environment that is difficult to forecast Two types Volume uncertainty Technological uncertainty

18 Problems caused by external uncertainty
Volume uncertainty Can you forecast sales accurately? No  Vertical integration Why? Difficult to predetermine everything in advance in a contract Technological uncertainty Can you predict technological changes accurately? No  Market Why? Stay flexible

19 Vertical integration: When?
Relationship specific investments External uncertainty Vertical integration Internal uncertainty

20 Internal uncertainty Definition
= Uncertainty about performance of distributors Causes: - No performance measures - Bad performance measures e.g. no benchmarks, not up-to-date, inaccurate

21 Problem caused by internal uncertainty
Can you evaluate performance accurately? No  Vertical integration Why? If you cannot assess outputs, you should monitor inputs (= effort). You can only do this for your own employees.

22 Other, sometimes valid, reasons to integrate
Market failure Reasons to vertically integrate Reaction to market power Creation of entry barriers Market development

23  Vertical integration
Advantages of vertical integration Eliminates the problem of relationship-specific investments Facilitates coping with volume uncertainty Reduces performance ambiguity Disadvantages of vertical integration High costs  vertical integration is not always possible/efficient The market mechanism is eliminated: it is more difficult to motivate employees than it is to motivate independent distributors

24  The market mechanism Advantages of the market
Independent distributors want to make profit  highly motivated to perform well Disadvantages of the market Independent distributors maximize own profit Independent distributors are not always willing to invest in relationship-specific investments

25  Compromising solutions: Hybrid forms
Market Hybrid Vertical forms integration 2 strategic choices Extensive contracts Partnerships

26 Conclusion Vertical integration: only when it is absolutely necessary
Remember that there are also other mechanisms to cope with market failure Contracts  next class Partnerships  next week


Download ppt "MKTG 450 Selected Topic in Marketing: Distribution Management Spring 2009, Dr. Stefan Wuyts Vertical integration."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google