1. SAR moderation: Equality and Diversity
A tale of two journeys

2. Moderation (1) Rationale for PRD Using the SAR in peer reviews
Different perspective as a reviewer
What did it tell me?
What didn’t it tell me?
What was the evidence?
Recognising the shortcomings in my own SAR

3. Sharing my SAR UGH! Oh no! Critical friend Value of a balanced group
Trust , confidence and support
Critical friend
Requirement to justify and explain
Improving self assessment skills
Value of a balanced group
Use of real exemplars

4. Next steps Rewriting my SAR wearing the reviewer hat
Robust approach
Based on evidence
Formalising moderation within the PRD group
Reviewing the SAR to take account of new CIF

5. Equality and diversity (2)
Context of Bullwood Hall, an exclusively foreign national prison
Making E&D real; laying bricks or making them?
Implications for SAR- a live document
What we do already
Across strands

6. Equality and diversity
How effectively does the provider actively promote equality and diversity, tackle discrimination and narrow the achievement gap?
Integral, not a bolt-on
What would you look for in a SAR?

7. Activity
In pairs/ groups, make a list of what you would expect to see in a SAR
Feedback
Review a case study-does it include the key expectations?

8. E&D in the SAR
Information about policies and procedures within the organisation and how they are communicated to staff and stakeholders
Defined responsibility for the promotion of and monitoring of E&D
How EO is promoted and monitored
Staff development, training and awareness of E&D
When and how learners receive EO information
How EO is reinforced on an ongoing basis
How data is collected and used to monitor the performance of different groups of learners
Examples of good practice or changes/initiatives introduced