1. Mission College Budget Summary and Implications

2. Mission college 11-12 Budget shortfall Plan
One-time Funds Expected in Year-end Balances
District Reduction Target $2,600,000
Office the Top Using Contingency $600,000
District’s Share (25%) $500,000
To be split between Colleges $1,500,000 (1-2,3)
WV’s share (53%) $795,000
Mission’s Share (47%) $705,000
Mission will utilize salary savings and year-end operating
Budget balances. 

3. WVMCCD Budget reduction targets fy 2012-2013
To be planned in 2011/2012. To take effect in 2012/2013
District Reduction Target $3,000,000
District’s Share (18%) $540,000
To be shared by Colleges $2,460,000 (1-2)
WV’s share (53%) $1,303,800
Mission’s Share (47%) $1,156,200

4. Budget Reduction planning Timeline- fall 2011
September 15 Mission College forum brainstorms and responses to
PC for a framework
September 28   PC framework goes to GAP for review and discussion
October 5 GAP workshop - GAP discusses reduction modalities
Considering three alternatives:
1. least harmful,
2. somewhat harmful, and
3. most harmful
October 12 GAP workshop – continue framework & options
October 19 GAP Workshop – Constituent draft approval
October 20 Draft goes to constituents for review (AS, CS & ASG)
November 9      Constituent responses to GAP
November 16    GAP recommendation to President
November 30   Mission Decision – by President  
December 1      Office of Administrative Services to submit 12/13 MC
budget reduction plan to district finance office

5. framework
All budget reductions met the “least harmful” recommendation given to the president by the college through our budget focus workshops
Additional reduction of $150,000 due to the RAM transition also completed by “least harmful” measures – though our reserves are depleted in doing so – this transition takes care of the 11/12 monies
District backfill noted in the RAM is based on monies the college saves – this will not occur in 11/12 due to 2% shortfall

6. Implications
12/13 Mission College will have to give another $150,000 as continued transition to West Valley
12/13 may have additional cuts dependent on the state budget situation
12/13 has no backfill from the district as noted in the RAM (additional reductions necessary)
Need to move from “least harmless” to other possible solutions

7. What are we Facing Land Corp money used for one time spending needs
Somewhat Harmful or Most Harmful solutions depending on budget implications
Integrated Planning that utilizes all possible revenues for college goals
Enrollment growth beyond our target
Efficiencies in all areas of the college

8. How Long is this going to last?
12/13 predicted to be the worst year
12/13 economy rebounding before education sees the revenues
12/13 economy rebound means fewer students coming back for retraining (implications for CTE)
12/13 continued transition of RAM dollars to West Valley
12/13 review of ftes split and further money transition to West Valley