1. From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
Date of download: 11/2/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(10): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Variables used in the theoretical model

2. From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
Date of download: 11/2/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(10): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Schematic of the drop impact process considered in the present study

3. From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
Date of download: 11/2/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(10): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparison of experimental results with model predictions for water-XG 0.05% solution with Ren=1667, We=177, and n=0.70 on a glass substrate (contact angle values as specified in Table )

4. From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
Date of download: 11/2/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(10): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparison of experimental results with model predictions for water-XG 0.20% solution with Ren=822, We=153.5, and n=0.35 on a glass substrate (contact angle values as specified in Table ). The lower and upper limits on prediction uncertainty due to the uncertainty in the fluid properties are included.

5. From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
Date of download: 11/2/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(10): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Spread factor predictions for three different values of n with Ren=5576, We=400, and contact angle values as specified for XG 0.05% in Table

6. From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
Date of download: 11/2/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(10): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Spread factor values for variations in the Reynolds number Ren with n=0.7, We=400, and contact angle values as specified for XG 0.05% in Table

7. From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
Date of download: 11/2/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(10): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Spread factor predictions for a decrease of 50% in the Reynolds number Ren with n=0.35, We=397, and contact angle values as specified for XG 0.20% in Table

8. From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
Date of download: 11/2/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(10): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Spread factor predictions for three different values of We with Ren=2845, n=0.7, and contact angle values as specified for XG 0.05% in Table

9. From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
Date of download: 11/2/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(10): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Effective viscosity evolution for a water-XG 0.05% solution on a glass substrate. n=0.70, Ren=1667, We=177, and contact angle values as specified for XG 0.05% in Table

10. From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
Date of download: 11/2/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Non-Newtonian Drops Spreading on a Flat Surface
J. Fluids Eng. 2010;132(10): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Comparison of Newtonian and non-Newtonian diameter predictions on a glass substrate for a water-XG 0.05% deposition (n=0.70, Ren=1667, and We=177) and an analogous Newtonian deposition (n=1, μ=4 mPa s, Ren=1593, and We=177). Contact angle values as specified for XG 0.05% in Table .