1. Effects of Ankle-Foot Orthoses on Ankle and Foot Kinematics in Patients With Subtalar Osteoarthritis 
Yu-Chi Huang, MD, Kimberly Harbst, PhD, Brian Kotajarvi, MS, PT, Diana Hansen, BA, Matthew F. Koff, PhD, Harold B. Kitaoka, MD, Kenton R. Kaufman, PhD 
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Volume 87, Issue 8, Pages (August 2006)
DOI: /j.apmr
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
Three different types of custom-made foot orthoses were evaluated in this study (from left to right): a rigid AFO, an HFO-R, and an HFO-A. Reprinted from Huang,15 with permission from the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
The joint coordination system that was used for measuring the triplanar angular motion of the hindfoot (calcaneus relative to the tibia).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
The sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes ROM of the (A) hindfoot and (B) forefoot in subtalar OA patients using 3 types of orthoses when walking on level walkway. NOTE. Values are average ± standard deviation (SD). *Significant difference (P<.05).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

5. Fig 4
The sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes ROM of the (A) hindfoot and (B) forefoot in subtalar OA patients using 3 types of orthoses when walking down the ramp. NOTE. Values are average ± SD. *Significant difference (P<.05).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

6. Fig 5
The sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes ROM of the (A) hindfoot and (B) forefoot in subtalar OA patients using 3 types of orthoses when walking up the ramp. NOTE. Values are average ± SD. *Significant difference (P<.05).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

7. Fig 6
The sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes ROM of the (A) hindfoot and (B) forefoot in subtalar OA patients using 3 types of orthoses when walking on the side slope-high condition. NOTE. Values are average ± SD. *Significant difference (P<.05).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions

8. Fig 7
The sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes ROM of the (A) hindfoot and (B) forefoot in ankle OA patients using 3 types of orthoses when walking on the side slope-low condition. NOTE. Values are average ± SD. *Significant difference (P<.05).
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr )
Copyright © 2006 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Terms and Conditions