Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJason Mills Modified over 6 years ago
1
From: Face Recognition is Shaped by the Use of Sign Language
Figure 1. Mean RTs and accuracy in the face categorization task for hearing non-signers, hearing signers, and deaf signers. Response times are reported in columns, and accuracies in lines. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. From: Face Recognition is Shaped by the Use of Sign Language J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. Published online September 08, doi: /deafed/enx034 J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
2
From: Face Recognition is Shaped by the Use of Sign Language
Figure 2. (A) Mean performance in the face recognition task for hearing non-signers, hearing signers, and deaf signers. Response times are reported in columns and accuracy in lines. (B) Mean Inverse Efficiency Score (IES) in the face recognition task for hearing non-signers, hearing signers, and deaf signers. Error bars represent standard error of the mean in both plots. From: Face Recognition is Shaped by the Use of Sign Language J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. Published online September 08, doi: /deafed/enx034 J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
3
From: Face Recognition is Shaped by the Use of Sign Language
Figure 3. Posteriors of threshold (upper plot) and drift-rate (lower plot) parameters for the hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the Drift-Diffusion Model in the face recognition task for hearing non-signers, hearing signers, and deaf signers From: Face Recognition is Shaped by the Use of Sign Language J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. Published online September 08, doi: /deafed/enx034 J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.