Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBartholomew Stephen Greene Modified over 6 years ago
1
European Court of Auditors Annual Reports 2013
5 November 2014 European Court of Auditors Annual Reports 2013 Vítor Caldeira, President
2
A moment of change New Parliament New Commission
New spending programmes and financial rules for Need to make best use of limited financial resources
3
Lessons from 2013 EU financial management not yet good enough overall
Significant room for further improving how funds are spent
4
EU financial management challenge
Use all available resources, and Ensure spending complies with EU rules, and Ensure it achieves valuable results for citizens
5
Spending 2013 payments almost 99% of the maximum available
Total spending €148.5 billion - €290 for every EU citizen.
6
Clean opinion A clean audit opinion on the reliability of the EU accounts As since start of programming period in 2007
7
Managing cash-flows Outstanding commitments and other liabilities continued to grow €322 billion at year end - likely to rise Commission should prepare a long range cash-flow forecast.
8
Financial engineering instruments
Commission plans to make even greater use of them Slow to reach recipients Complex and difficult to account for correctly Commission should ensure contributions to such instruments reflect real cash-flow needs and are properly accounted for
9
Compliance with the rules
Revenue regular Financial commitments regular Payments materially affected by error
10
2013 error rate Estimated error rate for 2013 payments = 4.7%
Close to 4.8% for 2012 Persistently higher than “materiality threshold” of 2%
11
Error in different spending areas
All spending areas apart from administrative expenditure affected by material error
12
Higher errors for shared management
Spending shared between the MS and the Commission is 80% of EU funds Error rate for payments under shared management = 5.2% In areas mostly managed directly by the EC = 3.7%
13
Effective internal controls can make a significant difference
EC and national authorities took corrective actions on errors they found Otherwise, overall error rate would have been 6.3 % rather than 4.7%
14
Internal controls could be more effective
National authorities had sufficient information available to have detected and corrected many errors before claiming reimbursement In rural development, could have reduced error rate from 6.7% to 2.0%
15
What needs to be done EC and MS need to generate better information about errors in spending and the corrective action they take Address the source of the problem
16
Main sources of error Claims for ineligible costs, projects, activities or beneficiaries Serious breaches of public procurement rules Incorrect declarations of agricultural areas
17
Financial managers not focused on results
Primarily on spending the money available Secondly on complying with the rules Only to a limited extent on achieving results
18
Current spending culture
Officials under pressure to spend or lose funding - lack incentives to achieve results Systems set up to use resources and to ensure compliance, rather than get results Need for change
19
Towards a culture of performance
Court welcomes Commission initiatives Must be based on genuine commitment at EU and national level Essential that right incentives are in place Need suitable targets for results up-front Need reliable information on progress towards achieving them
20
Framework for reporting performance
Better information is a pre-requisite for more effective accountability Annual evaluation report produced by Commission Framework too fragmented – needs further improvement Does not cover EU added-value or progress towards Europe 2020
21
Recommendations to Commission
Propose more coherent performance reporting framework at next review Summarise progress towards 2020 targets in annual evaluation report Further develop responsibility for contribution of EU spending to policy achievements
22
Conclusions EU Budget management could – and should – be better
Not a choice between spending, compliance and results - need all three at once More manageable budget = clearer objectives and simpler arrangements for spending
23
European Court of Auditors Annual Reports 2013
Vítor Caldeira President 5 November 2014
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.