Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKaren Chambers Modified over 6 years ago
1
Agenda for 13th Class Admin Name plates Handouts Slides Polinsky
Court Visit – Friday 10/28 More info later Keep day clear – 7AM to 2PM Review Appeals German procedure 1995 Exam Intro to Settlement & ADR
2
Assignment for Next Class
Settlement and ADR Yeazell pp , , You do not need to read these materials carefully Handout (Polinsky) If you are not quantitatively inclined, you will need to read this carefully. Polinsky is extremely clear, but it will take time. Questions on last page of Polinsky handout This is writing assignment for Writing Group 5
3
Review of Appeals Can only appeal to change judgment
Need not cross-appeal to defend judgment on different grounds than used by trial court Final judgment rule Can only appeal when case is really over Waiver Can only appeal issues properly raised and presented in trial court Harmless error Appellate court only reverses if error really made a different Standards of review De novo – 12(b)(6), SJ, JMOL and other legal issues Clear error – findings of fact in bench trials and other contexts Abuse of discretion – when court has discretion Amendment, sanctions, new trial, and nearly all discovery issues
4
Review of German Procedure
Control of sequence Discovery Witnesses Experts Appellate review Judicial career
5
1995 Exam
6
Intro to Settlement I Most cases settle
Roughly 2/3rds of filed cases settle Some cases settle even before complaint filed Roughly 5% go to trial Roughly 20% dismissed (Rule 12) or terminated by summary judgment Roughly 10% other – default judgment, plaintiff failed to prosecute, referred to arbitration, etc. Settlement is contract by which plaintiff dismisses case in return for something valuable from the defendant Usually money Can be almost anything – job, house, letter of recommendation, apology Often non-monetary terms -- Confidentiality/secrecy, return of discovery documents, payment of costs Economic analysis of settlement Settlement is attractive to parties because it enables them to save on the cost of litigation Settlements is sometimes not possible, because parties are sometimes too optimistic about trial outcomes Settlement is sometimes not reached, if the parties are too stubborn (strategic) in their negotiations
7
Intro to Settlement II Economic analysis of settlement
Settlement attractive to parties because saves on litigation costs Total litigation costs often equal net amount plaintiff recovers Suppose plaintiff wins $90,000 Usually pays one third to lawyer. So plaintiff’s lawyer gets $30,000 So plaintiff nets $60,0000 = $90,000 - $30,000 Defendant usually pays lawyers roughly same amount: $30,000 So lawyers get $60,000 ($30,000 + $30,000) and plaintiff gets $60,0000 Defendant pays $120,000 = $90,000 + $30,000 If settle early, parties can both be better off E.g. Defendant settles with plaintiff for $80,000 Of course, depends in part on how much parties have already invested in litigation
8
Intro to Settlement III
Economic analysis of settlement (cont.) Settlement possible if it makes both sides better off than trial Need to calculate outcome if case did not settle Easy if trial outcome known with certainty Plaintiff. Judgment minus lawyers fees. 90K -30K=60K Defendant. Judgment plus lawyer’s fees. 90K+30K=120K So any settlement amount between 60K and 120K would make both parties better off Of course, may fail to settle because of hard bargaining If trial outcome uncertain, need to calculate expected value Expected value = probability that plaintiff will prevail x judgment amount if plaintiff prevails Suppose 50% probability that plaintiff will get 100K Plaintiff better off with settlement greater than: (50% x 100K) – 30K = 50K – 30K = 20K Defendant better off with settlement less than: (50% x 100K) + 30K = 50K + 30K = 80K So any settlement between 20K and 80K would make both parties better off Of course, lots of simplifying assumptions….
9
Intro ADR ADR = Alternative Disputes Resolution
Mediation. Settlement negotiations with assistance from neutral person Mediator does not have power to imposed settlement Used with increasing frequency Arbitration. Adjudication by private judge Settlement is sometimes classified as ADR
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.