1. Adoration of the Magi dating to the early 3rd century AD
Other Early Views
Adoration of the Magi dating to the early 3rd century AD

2. Baptism of Christ circa 330 AD

3. Earliest Surviving Icon of Christ circa 6th Century Outside Zagorsk

4. Jesus as Teacher circa 4th Century

5. Christ Between Peter & Paul – 3rd Century

6. Christ as the Good Shepherd circa 250 AD

7. Christ Healing a Cripple circa 235 AD

8. Mandylion of Edessa best estimate circa 40 AD

9. Shroud of Turin negative best estimate circa 30 AD

10. Shroud Positive/Negative Comparison 3-D distribution of pixels on Shroud

11. Shroud of Turin before restoration - face in middle

12. Full length negatives of the shroud of Turin

13. Anatomical Forensics of Shroud of Turin
A number of studies on the anatomical consistency of the image on the shroud and the nature of the wounds on it have been performed, following the initial study by Yves Delage in 1902 who declared the image anatomically flawless. Among forensic pathologists, it seems that there is a clear consensus to say that the man of the shroud is a real man and in state of rigor mortis.
In 1950 surgeon Pierre Barbet wrote a long study called A Doctor at Calvary which was later published as a book. Barbet stated that his experience as a battlefield surgeon during World War I led him to conclude that the image on the shroud was authentic, anatomically correct and consistent with crucifixion.
In 1997, forensic pathologist Robert Bucklin constructed a scenario of how a systematic autopsy on the man of the shroud would have been conducted. He noted the series of traumatic injuries which extend from the shoulder areas to the lower portion of the back, which he considered consistent with whipping; and marks on the right shoulder blade which he concluded were signs of carrying a heavy object. Bucklin concluded that the image was of a real person, subject to crucifixion.

14. Anatomical Forensics of Shroud of Turin
For over a decade, medical examiner Frederick Zugibe performed a number of studies using himself and volunteers suspended from a cross, and presented his conclusions in a book in Zugibe considers the shroud image and its proportions as authentic, but disagrees with Barbet and Bucklin on various details such as blood flow. Zugibe concluded that the image on the shroud is of the body of a man, but that the body had been washed.
In 2001, Pierluigi Baima Bollone, a professor of forensic medicine in Turin, stated that the forensic examination of the wounds and bloodstains on the Shroud indicate that the image was that of the dead body of a man who was whipped, wounded around the head by a pointed instrument and nailed at the extremities before dying.

15. Carbon Dating the Shroud
Showed it was crested in the Middle Ages
But the sample used was taken from an area of the cloth that had been repaired after the shroud was partly damaged in a fire
No tests were done on a sample of the original cloth and he Church wants to stop tests out of fear of futher damage to the shroud

16. The Cloth Covering Jesus Face?
Discovered in Jerusalem and carbon dated to time of Christ
Contains male human blood but no image
Mitochondrial testing of the blood reveals only a female component of the DNA. This man was born without any male contribution to his DNA.
Draw your own conclusions