Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCarmel Hunter Modified over 6 years ago
1
The Impact of Implementing Technology in Science Instruction
Rozina Macaj Seminar in Applied Theory and Research II Dr. O’Connor-Petruso Spring 2010
2
Table of Contents Research Design Threats to Internal Validity
Threats to External Validity Proposed Data Proposed Data Analysis References
3
Pre-Experimental Design: One-Group Pre survey-Post survey Design
Research Design Pre-Experimental Design: One-Group Pre survey-Post survey Design -Single group is pre surveyed (O), exposed to a treatment (x) and post surveyed (o). Symbolic Design: OXO
4
Possible Threats to Internal Validity
History: Participants in the study may get distracted by many factors such as fire drills, announcement, phone ringing, weather conditions, etc. Testing/Pre-testing Sensitization: Participants will be more familiar with the directions, readings, and expectations in the post survey. Instrumentation: Surveys will be made up by the researcher so they may not be totally reliable so they will be a possible threat. Mortality: Some students may drop out of the project or move to another school. Selection - Maturation Interaction: Since students are different ages (10-11 years old), their maturity level differs.
5
Threats to External Validity
Ecological Validity Results cannot be generalized because if the study will be done in a different environment , the results will change. Pre-test treatment Students may react differently during the intervention just because they have been pre surveyed. Selection Treatment Interaction: The participants have not been randomly selected. Multiple Treatment: All surveys will be given in a short period of time. Experimenter Effects: Researcher and teacher’s spiritual mood, age, and race may influence students’ attitude toward the study.
6
Threats to External Validity
Reactive Arrangement/Participant Effects: -Placebo effect: Some students may blindly believe that the use of computer helps them enhance their learning in science, they may answer the surveys based on that belief rather than based on the real impact computer had during science lessons. Some students may believe that computer is not good at all so they may ignore the study. -Novelty effect: Some students may be interested during first lesson where computer is used as an instructional tool, but they may get bored and not interested later on.
7
Proposed Data Students ‘ Technology Pre/Post Survey
Students’ Attitude Toward Science Pre /Post Survey Teacher’s Pre/Post Survey about the importance of the use of technology in science instructions.
8
Proposed Data -Do you enjoy learning science?
Pre Survey: Question # 10 -Do you enjoy learning science? Post Survey: Question # 10 -Did you enjoy learning science using technology?
9
Proposed Data-Bar Graph
Name Pre Survey score Post Survey score St. # 1 2 3 St. # 2 1 St. # 3 St. # 4 4 St. # 5 St.# 6 St. # 7 St. # 8 st. # 9 St. # 10 St.# 11 St. # 12 St. # 13 St. # 14 St. # 15 St. # 16 St. # 17 St. # 18 St. # 19 St. # 20 St. # 21 St. # 22 St. # 23 St. # 24 St. # 25 students
10
Proposed Data(Correlation)
Post Survey score
11
Proposed Data (analyses)
The data shows that there is a fear positive correlation. The data indicates that the use of technology in science instruction influences students’ attitude toward science.
12
References O’Connor-Petruso, S., (2008). Stat. scales.analyses. threats. design. ppt
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.