Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

OPT 2 Decisive Point Brief (DP 2)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "OPT 2 Decisive Point Brief (DP 2)"— Presentation transcript:

1 OPT 2 Decisive Point Brief (DP 2)

2 Lines of Operations

3 Lines of Ops, Decisive Points, S-COG and End States
Establish CTF’s Credibility DP 7 : CTF Organised and Mission-Ready 7 DP 5 : Kuhistan’s Peaceful Nuclear & Chemical Programs are Verified 5 Strengthen KUH & SON commitment to the peace process DP 1 : Hostility between Kuhistan and Sonora has Ceased 1 DP 6 : Territorial Integrity Is Restored 6 Ops End States Stable & secured environment Mitigate humanitarian disasters DP 2 : CTF Facilitates Humanitarian Assistance (HA) 2 DP 4 : External supports for hostile groups’ activities are denied 4 Curtail hostile group activities DP 3 : Hostile Groups’ freedom of action & sanctuary are denied 3 DP 8 : IDP & Refugees Resettled 8

4 CTF Facilitates Humanitarian Assistance (HA)
Decisive Point 2 – CTF Facilitates Humanitarian Assistance (HA)

5 DP 2 : CTF Facilitates Humanitarian Assistance (HA)
Ending Conditions Key Components Critical to successful DP achievement A secured and stable environment that facilitate HA efforts Assessment & mitigation of HA needs CTF able to render emergency aids to mitigate immediate humanitarian disaster crisis Critical infrastructures (means) for relief agencies (UN/IOs/NGOs) to facilitate HA efforts Return of relief agencies (UN/IOs/NGOs) and the ability to access humanitarian relief areas Security of areas that require HA Secured areas for humanitarian relief efforts Co-ord HA efforts with KUH’s local authority & national relief agencies Successful facilitation of UN & KUH’s local authority & national agencies to take lead in HA, rehabilitation & refugee repatriation efforts

6 Decisive Point Analysis

7 DP 2 : CTF Facilitates Humanitarian Assistance (HA)
Supporting Effects Target Audience Lead Supported (& Supporting) Entities MOEs Measure of effectiveness indicators HA Groups Warring Factions (KAH & SON) Hostile Factions (within KAH) CTF Cases of incidents in specific sectors Freedom of movement 1. Secure area of interest Feasibility: YES Suitability: YES Acceptability: YES 1. Assessment & mitigation of HA needs 2. Critical infrastructures (means) for relief agencies (UN/IOs/NGOs) to facilitate HA efforts 3. Security of areas that require HA 4. Co-ord HA efforts with KUH’s local authority & national relief agencies

8 DP 2 : CTF Facilitates Humanitarian Assistance (HA)
Supporting Effects Target Audience Lead Supported (& Supporting) Entities MOEs Measure of effectiveness indicators IDP Refugees CTF HA Agencies Local Government Reaction to various situation: a. Medical Requirements b. Logistics c. Security Establishment of a crisis response team within CTF Reduction of risk so as to entice HA efforts Increase of HA activities from various organizations 2. CTF able to render immediate crisis management support 1. Assessment & mitigation of HA needs 2. Critical infrastructures (means) for relief agencies (UN/IOs/NGOs) to facilitate HA efforts 3. Security of areas that require HA 4. Co-ord HA efforts with KUH’s local authority & national relief agencies Feasibility: YES Suitability: YES Acceptability: YES

9 DP 2 : CTF Facilitates Humanitarian Assistance (HA)
Supporting Effects Target Audience Lead Supported (& Supporting) Entities MOEs Measure of effectiveness indicators Local Populace/ Government, UN, IO, NGO CTF / CMOC 3. Assessment of Humanitarian Needs Identification of population basic needs Increased knowledge of HA sectors (7 sectors) 1. Assessment & mitigation of HA needs 2. Critical infrastructures (means) for relief agencies (UN/IOs/NGOs) to facilitate HA efforts 3. Security of areas that require HA 4. Co-ord HA efforts with KUH’s local authority & national relief agencies Feasibility: YES Suitability: YES Acceptability: YES

10 DP 2 : CTF Facilitates Humanitarian Assistance (HA)
Supporting Effects Target Audience Lead Supported (& Supporting) Entities MOEs Measure of effectiveness indicators Establishment of CMOC/ Humanitarian Information Centre Systematic Regular meetings/ Discussions Increase of HA activities from various organizations Decreased in HA needs Increased in logistic activities 4. Facilitation of HA effort Establish Information sharing between stakeholders Infrastructure Facilities Local Government HA Groups CTF Feasibility: YES Suitability: YES Acceptability: YES 1. Assessment & mitigation of HA needs 2. Critical infrastructures (means) for relief agencies (UN/IOs/NGOs) to facilitate HA efforts 3. Security of areas that require HA 4. Co-ord HA efforts with KUH’s local authority & national relief agencies

11 Decisive Point Analysis DP 8

12 DP 8 : IDP & Refugees Resettled
Ending Conditions Key Components Critical to successful DP achievement CTF’s support to Humanitarian aid is no longer needed by host nation through resettlement program Secured environment - Returning of IDP to homes in KUH - Refugees resettled IDP’s will to return home Refugees agreed to resettlement plans

13 DP 8 : IDP & Refugees Resettled
Supporting Effect Target Audience Lead Supported (& Supporting) Entities Measure of Effectiveness Measure of Effectiveness Indicators Secured environment as per DP 2 UN Local Government Agencies


Download ppt "OPT 2 Decisive Point Brief (DP 2)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google