Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Conservation Development Exercise 3.5

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Conservation Development Exercise 3.5"— Presentation transcript:

1 Conservation Development Exercise 3.5
John M. Davis Conservation Outreach Coordinator TX Parks and Wildlife Department

2 We will conserve only what we love.
We will love only what we understand. We will understand only what we are taught. -Baba Dioum, Central African naturalist

3 “Nothing beats the combination of righteousness and profit.”
The Process “Nothing beats the combination of righteousness and profit.” - Ian McHarg

4 Randall Arendt

5 The Process

6 Chimney Rock - Flower Mound
North 1171 104 Acres Zoning = 2 Acre Single Family

7 Chimney Rock – Primary Conservation Area (PCA)
Wetland and supplying streams North 1171

8 View Secondary Conservation Areas (SCA) Cross Timbers woodland habitat
Scenic view from 1171 to wetland Historic barn at entrance North View 1171

9 Chimney Rock - Flower Mound
North 1171 Best Areas to Build

10 Chimney Rock - Flower Mound
North 1171

11 Chimney Rock - Flower Mound
Willard Baker North 1171

12 Base Map 50 Acres Mostly Forested Cultural Sites Floodplain

13 Primary Conservation Areas (PCA’s) Floodplain Cultural Sites

14 Secondary Conservation Areas (SCA’s) Stone Wall

15 Secondary Conservation Areas (SCA’s) Stone Wall Forested Areas (No Prairie at this site.)

16 Best Places to Build

17 Design Your Project Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4
-5ac lots, 10 homes Scenario 2 -2ac lots, 25 homes Scenario 3 -Cons. Development -25 homes -Conservation -Recreation -Community Scenario 4 -Mixed Use -Walk-ability -Quality of Life Show Roads, Pad Sites, & Property Lines

18

19 First Scenario 5 ac lots 10 homes 3000ft2 home site

20 Pros and Cons? Pro: Avoids Most PCA’s Limited Fragmentation
Saves Stone Walls Con: 2 Creek Crossings No Common Amenities Own 5ac., Access 5ac. Infrastructure Cost (bridges, roads, utilities) No Mixed Use

21 Pros and Cons? Pro: Limited Fragmentation Not Much Infrastructure Con:
6 Creek Crossings Cuts Through PCA’s No Common Amenities Own 5ac., Access 5ac. No Mixed Use

22 Second Scenario 2 ac lots 25 homes 3000ft2 home site

23 Pros and Cons? Pro: Avoids Most PCA’s Saves Stone Walls
Increased Density Con: More Fragmentation 4 Creek Crossings No Common Amenities Own 2ac., Access 2ac. High Infrastructure Cost (bridges, roads, utilities) No Mixed Use

24 Third Scenario Cons. Development 1/4 ac lots or more 25 homes
Hiking Trail Cons. Development 1/4 ac lots or more 25 homes 3000ft2 home site Recreation Community Natural Resources Gazebo Common Open Space

25 Pros and Cons? Pro: Avoids Most PCA’s Saves Stone Walls
Avoids Most SCA’s Increased Density Minimal Fragmentation 1 Creek Crossings Common Amenities Own ~1/4ac., Access ~44ac. Low Infrastructure Cost (bridges, roads, utilities) Con: (?) Smaller Lot Sizes No Mixed Use

26 Third Scenario Version 2
Cons. Development 1/4 ac lots or more 25 homes 3000ft2 home site Recreation Community Natural Resources Storm Water Wetlands

27 Fourth Scenario Mixed Use 1/4 ac lots or more 25 homes
3000ft2 home site Walkability Community Natural Resources Quality of Life Comm.

28 Fourth Scenario Pro: Avoids Most PCA’s Saves Stone Walls
Avoids Most SCA’s Increased Density Minimal Fragmentation 1 Creek Crossings Common Amenities Own ~1/4ac., Access ~44ac. Low Infrastructure Cost (bridges, roads, utilities) Mixed Use in Walking Dist. Con: (?) Smaller Lot Sizes Commercial Impervious Surface (?) Comm.

29 Conservation Development Exercise 3.5
John M. Davis Conservation Outreach Coordinator TX Parks and Wildlife Department

30 Conservation Development Exercise 3.5
John M. Davis Conservation Outreach Coordinator TX Parks and Wildlife Department

31


Download ppt "Conservation Development Exercise 3.5"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google