Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Today Minimum wage background
Theory: what happens to employment when the minimum wage increases? Empirical evidence: Card and Krueger (1994) Does the minimum wage fight poverty?
2
Minimum wage background
Federal minimum wage started in 1938 at 25 cents an hour Covered about 43% of wage and salary workers Low wage sectors such as agriculture, retail trade, and services were excluded Coverage expanded over time – by 1974, about 85% of private sector hourly workforce covered
3
Nominal vs Real Value The minimum wage is set in nominal terms, and has been periodically increased
4
Nominal vs Real Value
5
Who earns the federal minimum wage?
Few are paid at or below the federal minimum 2.56 million Americans 3.3% of all workers who are paid hourly earn the minimum wage 63% are women About half of all minimum wage earners work in the food industry and retail
6
Who earns the federal minimum wage?
Minimum wage earners are generally young Though the majority are older than 25 Source: BLS, 2015
10
State minimum wage States can set minimum wages that are higher than the federal minimum wage As of this past January, 29 states have minimum wages that are higher than the federal minimum wage California’s minimum wage is $10.50 as of January 1, 2017 Washington state has the highest minimum wage, currently set at $11.00 and is annually indexed for inflation
11
Cities also have minimum wages
33 cities have minimum wages above their state minimum wage. Seattle $13, LA $12, San Francisco $13, Oakland $12.86 Often they have different minimum wages depending on the size of the employer.
12
What does CEA cite as reasons to raise the minimum wage?
What does AEI cite as reasons not to raise the minimum wage?
13
What facts do they seem to disagree about?
14
Employment effects: textbook theory
Initially, the competitive labor market is in equilibrium at E0 and w0 Now the government imposes a minimum wage of wm Assume has universal coverage
15
Employment effects: textbook theory
As a result, (E0 – Em) workers are displaced and become unemployed Further, the higher wage encourages (Sm – E0 ) workers to enter the labor market, but they cannot find jobs Unemployment rate = (Sm – Em) / Sm
16
If this theory is correct…
Larger employment effect with more elastic demand and supply curves Doesn’t mean the minimum wage is bad - means there are tradeoffs
17
Model assumes: Compliance – many firms actually pay less than the minimum wage Ignores migration between covered and uncovered sectors Perfect competition
18
Migration between sectors
SU Dollars SC Employment EU EC (b) Uncovered Sector E w w* DU DC (If workers migrate to covered sector) (If workers migrate to uncovered sector) Covered sector: Experiences increase in the minimum wage Uncovered sector: Could experience workers migrating in or out
19
Theoretically, what could explain zero disemployment effects of minimum wage hikes?
20
Possible stories Inelastic labor demand Hiring and firing costs
Labor/Labor substitution Monopsony
21
Perfect Comp vs Monopsony
Workers Wage Tacos MPL MRPL total costs MC 1 10 8 16 2 15 7 14 20 3 21 6 12 30 4 26 5 40 50 33 60 35 70 36 80 Workers Wage Tacos MPL MRPL total costs MC 1 4 8 16 2 6 15 7 14 12 3 21 24 10 26 5 40 30 60 20 33 84 35 112 28 18 36 144 32
22
Empirical evidence: what happens when the minimum wage goes up?
George Stigler 1946 Early studies focused on low wage industries: Peterson 1957 criticized a BLS report finding no effect on unemployment Lester 1960 criticized Peterson saying he cherry picked results
23
Empirical evidence: what happens when the minimum wage goes up?
Next wave of studies used changes over time in the federal minimum wage Welch 1974 found large statistically significant effects data from Siskind 1977 found data error in Welch (he was only actually using 16-19) and can no longer differentiate the effect from 0. Welch 1977 said essentially “yeah, yeah I meant yr olds all along.” Also found no statistically significant effects for the population as a whole. Brown, Gilroy, & Kohen 1983 noted a problem with the inference and try to correct for it using more data Find marginally significant effect: -.09 Wellington duplicated BGK and finds no statistically significant effect with even more data : -.06
24
Now: Try to use better methods to answer this question.
YOU WON’T BELIEVE THE METHODS THAT PARTISAN IDEOLOGUES HATE!!!!
25
Is the minimum wage an effective anti-poverty program?
Empirical evidence shows that the dis-employment responses to the minimum wage are definitely not large So increases in the minimum wage tend to lead to increases in the earning among low wage workers Doesn’t cost the government because employers pay wages not the government BUT!
26
Is the minimum wage an effective anti-poverty program?
When the minimum wage increases, this raises the wage for low-income individuals, not low-income families Evidence suggests that minimum wage not an effective (or efficient) way of combating poverty in the U.S. because not well-targeted
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.