Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLorin Perry Modified over 6 years ago
1
The Role of the Microbiology Laboratory in AMS programs
Maria Virginia Villegas, MD, MSc, FIDSA Scientific Director Bacterial Resistance and Hospital Epidemiology Research Area International Center for Medical Research and Training, Cali, Colombia CIDEIM
2
Antimicrobial Stewardship Core Team
Dellit TH, et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44:
3
Aims of the talk To discuss the important role of the microlab in an Antimicrobial Stewardship program Antibiogram interpretation with footnotes to help the physicians make the right antibiotic choice 2. Elaborate the epidemiologic report that will be used to create the antibiotic guidelines( ex : using WHONET ).
4
LABORATORY REPORT S.aureus
Rifampin S Ampicillin R Vancomycin S Oxacillin S TMP-SMX S Cefazoline R Gentamicin S Levofloxacin S
5
SUPPRESSION RULE OF ANTIBIOTICS
1. If S. aureus is susceptible to Oxacillin Do not report Vancomycin or Quinolones. PS: Oxacillin is reported with a footnote that specifically says that any Beta-lactam can be given 2. If the S. aureus isolate is MRSA Report Vancomycin and other therapeutic options such as Linezolid, Daptomycin, Ceftaroline, Clindamycin and TMP-SMX.
6
For MRSA Report Vancomycin with the MIC and a footnote :
If the MIC is ≥ 2 µgms /ml DO NOT give Vancomycin because of the high risk for therapeutic failure ( > 50 % ) in severe infections/bacteremia. If the MIC is ≥ 1 µgms /ml, it can be used with a loading dose of mg/kg, then 15 mg /kg every 12 hours AND re-evaluate the therapeutic response after 48 hours. Interconsultation with infectious disease to define the use of Linezolid, Daptomycin, Ceftaroline , according to the site of infection and clinical conditions ( pneumonia vs bacteremia vs soft tissue infections ).
7
EXAMPLE OF MRSA MIC DISTRIBUTION FOR VANCOMYCIN
8
Influence of Vancomycin MIC on Outcome in S.aureus Infection
100 Failure Success 90 80 70 60 Percent 50 40 30 A study by Moise-Broder in 2004 demonstrates the relationship between minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and treatment success Increases in MIC from 0.5 to 1 to 2 were significantly associated with increasing treatment failure Moise-Broder et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38: 20 10 0.5 1 2 MIC Moise-Broder et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:
9
LABORATORY REPORT P.aeruginosa
Amikacin S Gentamicin R Ceftazidime S Cefepime S Imipenem R Ciprofloxacin S Meropenem R Pip/tazobactam S Footnote : This P. aeruginosa has both OprD-mediated resistance mechanism and efflux pump activation. Other anti-pseudomonal agents can be used.
10
SUPPRESSION RULE OF ANTIBIOTICS
For P. aeruginosa: ●Report ALL the antibiotics with antipseudomonal activity with their respective MIC. ●Do not report other quinolones when there is resistance to Ciprofloxacin (cross resistance). ●Do not report ANY antibiotic without antipseudomonal activity i.e.: Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime, TMP-SMX, Amp/sulbactam, Ertapenem etc.
11
LABORATORY REPORT E.coli
Amikacin S Ampicillin R Cefazolin R Ceftazidime S Cefepime S Ceftriaxone S Ciprofloxacin R Meropenem S Levofloxacin S Pip/tazobactam S
12
SUPPRESSION RULE OF ANTIBIOTICS
Quinolones report for Gram (-) bacteria including P.aeruginosa : ▪ If ciprofloxacin is resistant, suppress other quinolones or put a footnote explaining that there is cross resistance. ▪ Ciprofloxacin is the most active quinolone against Gram(-) bacteria ▪ In contrast Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin are more active against Gram(+) bacteria
13
LABORATORY REPORT E.cloacae
Amikacin S Pip/tazobactam R Cefazoline R Ceftazidime R Cefepime S Ceftriaxone R Cefoxitin R Levofloxacin S
14
SUPPRESSION RULE OF ANTIBIOTICS
For AmpC GROUP : Footnote : The use of third generation cephalosporin's is associated with high risk of clinical failure during treatment (especially in bacteremia and severe infections) Avoid their use as well as Beta-lactamase inhibitors. The antibiotics of choice are : carbapenems (especially Ertapenem ), tigecycline ( only in mild infections, to de-escalate, or in allergies to B-lactams ), ciprofloxacin ( for UTI, skin infections ) and cefepime ( if there is also risk of Pseudomona ).
15
LABORATORY REPORT Klebsiella pneumoniae
Amikacin S Ampicillin R Cefazolin R Ceftazidime S/R Cefepime S/R Ceftriaxone R/R Ertapenem S Meropenem S Levofloxacin S Pip/tazobactam S/R
16
ESBL confirmatory test
C--NH H2N S N Caz O CH3 N o C CH3 COOH CEFTAZIDIME Caz + Clav Ctx + Clav ESBL Ctx
17
SUPPRESSION RULE OF ANTIBIOTICS
For ESBLS Footnote : This bacteria produces an Extended Spectrum Cephalosporin ( ESBL ) . The use of any cephalosporin and Aztreonam is associated with a high risk of clinical failure during treatment. Avoid their use, as well as Pip/taz and Cefepime In the report: Ceftriaxone, Cefotaxime, Ceftazidime and Aztreonam SHOULD BE Resistant. Don’t report ( block it ) Pip/tazo and Cefepime. 3. Confirmatory test for ESBLS should always be included ( even for strains in the susceptible range).
18
Cefepime monotherapy for cefepime-susceptible ESBL-producing infections : MIC is important!!!
Mortality rates in 3 patient subgroups who received cefepime (n = 33) stratified by MIC of cefepime Lee, N. Y. et al Clin Infect. Dis. 6(4):
19
Low MIC <=2 AAC 2013
20
JAC 2012
21
Aims of the talk To discuss the important role of the microlab in an Antimicrobial Stewardship program Antibiogram interpretation with footnotes to help the physicians make the right antibiotic choice 2. Use of WHONET to elaborate the epidemiologic report that will be used to create the antibiotic guidelines.
22
Local Epidemiology ICU
23
Trends of Resistant Microorganisms
Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Meropenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Trimesters in
24
Microbiological profile of the first five microorganisms by the most frequent sample types in General wards January-December 2014 Once you have the source of infection and the predominant micro-organisms, you can create specific Antibiotic Guidelines; in this case for : UTI, Skin and Soft Tissue Infections and UTI associated to Foley catheter.
25
Antibiotic Resistance Analysis in Gram-Negative Bacteria
Antibiotic resistance percentages for the most frequently isolated Gram-negative bacteria from ICUs, January-December 2012
26
MIC Analysis for Choosing the Antipseudomonal Antibiotic with the SMALLER Non-Susceptible Bacterial Population Piperacillin/Tazobactam Cefepime Imipenem Meropenem MIC (µg/mL) %
27
Example to decide if adding or Not an Aminoglycoside to the Beta-Lactam therapy for P.aeruginosa
AMK (MIC) MEM (MIC) “According to the susceptibility tests performed, 69% of P. aeruginosa (n = 29) are susceptible to both amikacin and meropenem. Combination therapy with meropenem and amikacin would increase chance of appropriate therapy in 10.3%.”
28
Antibiotic Resistance Analysis in Gram-Positive Bacteria
Antibiotic resistance percentages for the most frequently isolated Gram-positive bacteria from ICUs, January-December 2012
29
Trends of Resistant Microorganisms Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus
30
Summary An AMS program should start in the microbiology laboratory.
The information generated through the microbiology lab is key for : Helping the MD select the appropriate antibiotic, which will reduce therapeutic failures and the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics Generating epidemiological data which will help the ID committee create and implement the Antibiotic Guidelines.
31
Thank you!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.