Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrent Austin Cooper Modified over 6 years ago
1
Craniofacial and VPI Related Speech Disorders
Melissa Montiel, SLP
2
Financial Disclosure Financial Disclosure: I am receiving an honorarium from the South Carolina Speech Language Hearing Association for this presentation and is employed by MUSC. Non Financial Disclosure: No relevant non- financial relationships to disclose.
3
What’s the difference? Normal mechanism vs. Cleft
4
Mechanism differences (cleft palate)
Smaller “vault” Possible malocclusion Anterior “fistula” until bone grafting Possible fistula from dehiscence
5
Smaller vault
6
Smaller Vault Articulatory deficits
7
Malocclusion/Midface Hypoplasia
8
Malocclusion Frontal sibilants (III) Difficulty with bilabials (II)
9
Alveolar fistula
10
Alveolar fistula Nasal regurgitation Nasal air emissions
Palatal expander and speech
11
Dehiscence after repair
12
Dehiscence Minor NAE Nasal regurgitation
13
“Normal” vs Cleft related speech
14
Normal Errors Fronting, gliding, stopping
Treated based on “age-appropriate” standard norms May or may not resolve without tx
15
Cleft Palate related disorders
Backing Palatalizing Compensatory: Glottal stopping, other (clicking) Nasal Assimilance VPI Not likely to resolve without intervention Goals not based on age/developmental norms
16
Backing Producing phonemes as /k,g/ ex: -Do=goo -Two=koo -boat=goat
17
Backing
18
Backing
19
Backing
20
Palatalizing Smaller vault, less space for tongue
Producing alveolar phonemes with mid-dorsal part of tongue vs tongue tip
21
palatalizing
22
Palatalizing
23
Glottal stopping Mechanisms way to produce pressure
Bypasses the VP mechanism on exam Can be because of VPI, or could be learned Very detrimental to intelligibility
24
Glottal Stopping
25
Glottal Stopping
26
Glottal stopping
27
Glottal Stopping
28
Glottal stopping
29
Compensatory Deficits produced by child attempting to make correct sounds Clicking, guttural sounds
30
Clicking
31
Compensatory- Clicking
32
Nasal Assimilation Producing vowels with hypernasality or phonemes with NAE when they are in the presence of a nasal phoneme -ham pizza, the /pi/ has NAE/hypernasality due the /m/ influence
33
Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI)
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: results in “An anatomical or structural defect that precludes adequate velopharyngeal closure (the decoupling of the oral and nasal cavities) ”* Basically, one is unable to appropriately and/or fully close off your oropharynx from the nasopharynx for the purpose of speech/swallowing
34
VPI Hypernasality- Too much energy in the nasal cavity. (Rant about hypo vs hypernasality) Nasal air emissions Weak pressure consonants (m/b, n/d) Nasal grimacing
35
VPI Poor feeding/sucking as infant
Trouble blowing out birthday candles Difficulty drinking through a straw Nasal regurgitation
36
Hypernasality vs NAE Hypernasality is too much energy resonating in the nasal cavity. Nasality describes energy. Vowels are energy. We are using the term hypernasal to describe a vowel.
37
NAE Most consonants have pressure, so you are listening for a nasal air emission (NAE), which sounds like snorting Can also perceive weak pressure on phonemes (m/b, n/d)
38
VPI
39
VPI
40
VPI
41
VPI
42
Time out: Phoneme specific Nasal Air Emission (PSNAE)
43
Phoneme specific Nasal air emissions (PSNAE)
Deficit in which the patient is able to achieve complete closure of VP port, however s/he has developed production of specific phonemes with nasal rather than oral pressure/flow/turbulence Deficit is an error in articulation, not the VP mechanism Sibilants and affricates Inconsistent NAE
45
PSNAE
46
PSNAE
47
PSNAE
48
PSNAE
49
PSNAE Pick up a baby Take a teddy Go get a cookie Suzie sees horses
Should I shut it Joey with a jar A chicken ate a chip (Leave Nasals out of it!)
50
When we refer Before surgery After surgery
51
When we refer Goal: -Eliminate compensatory or misuse
-Work on non pressure phonemes, vowel markers -NOT nasality
52
When we refer After surgery -Eliminate compensatory
-Estimate if this is habitual, teach oral vs nasal -May not need tx if placement was correct before surgery
53
Treatment Where to start?
Remember, separate out deficits. Working on manner? Stick with manner.
54
Treatment Don’t worry about manner re: nasality with compensatories
Hypernasality is not generally your goal Teach placement with turbulence Use of /m/ and /n/ Remember “puppy” may be “mummy” Eliminate compensatory strategies
55
Treatment Liquids and glides Approximations, vowel markers
Treatment, not games. -Token therapy, telling them when it’s wrong Rapid phrases. -How phrases changes phonemic sequence.
56
Things to avoid No oral motor Non speech tasks for majority of session
Holding nose during therapy /k,g/- sometimes
57
Treatment Cues for bilabials, alveolar, velars Intrusive /h/
Frontalized /s/ Blowing with /f/ Blends /t/for /ch/ and /d/ for /j/
58
Children work best with concrete, consistent cues
Children work best with concrete, consistent cues. They change their speech by what they feel
59
Blowing with /f/, intrusive /h/
60
/s/ with intrusive /h/
61
Rapid phrase
62
/s/ with intrusive /h/
63
Treatment /s/
64
Tx of /f/
65
Using approximations
66
Treatment of backing, decreasing complexity
67
Tx PSNAE, using approximations
68
Tx PSNAE
69
TX PSNAE
70
TX PSNAE
71
Tx glottal stopping
72
Bilabials
73
Alveolars
74
Tx of /k,g/
75
Tx of /s/
76
Nasal assimilation
77
Tx glottal stopping
78
Self monitoring
79
Tx of compensatory
80
Tx of compensatory
81
Final result
82
Kummer, A.W. (2001). Cleft palate and craniofacial anomalies: the effects on speech and resonance. San Diego, CA: Singular. *
83
Melissa Montiel, MS, CCC-SLP
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.