Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCamilla Fields Modified over 6 years ago
1
Aerodynamics PDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 21, 2003
Brian Chesko Brian Hronchek Ted Light Doug Mousseau Brent Robbins Emil Tchilian
2
Aerodynamics PDR Design Process
Span-wise distribution for cl found using Lifting-Line Theory Airfoil Selection Drag Integration
3
Lifting-Line Theory Wing modeled as distribution of horseshoe vortices
Fourier Series for circulation along span Inputs: a = dcl/da = 5.66 (airfoil specific) Constant Chord = 2.8 AR = 5 a = 6.85 deg (to match CL) (actually a - aL=0)
4
Prandtl’s Lifting-Line
Solve Prandtl’s wing equation Substitute System of N equations with N unknowns (Solve N N matix) Take N different spanwise locations on the wing where the equation is to be satisfied: 1, 2, .. N; (but not at the tips, so: 0 < 1 < )
5
Lifting-Line For Rectangular Wing
Consider: rectangular wing: c = constant; span = b; b/c = A = 5 without twist: = constant; L=0 = 0 Evaluate the wing equation at the N control points at i : The wing is symmetrical A2, A4,… are zero take only A1, A3,… as unknowns take only control points on half of the wing: 0 < i /2 Example for N=30: take A1, A3, A5 as unknowns take control points (equidistant in ): = /(2N) stepping take lift-slope of the airfoil a0 = 5.66, and wing aspect ratio A = 5
6
Lifting-Line Calculation
Sample Output N = 3 CL calculation from lifting line theory CL = πAR*A1*α CL = W/S*q = from constraint solve for a = 6.8 deg in order to match CL CDi calculation cl calculation
7
Section Lift Coefficient Varies from ~ 0 – 0.6
Lifting-Line Theory Outputs: CDi = Cdi distribution CL = Cl distribution Section Lift Coefficient Varies from ~ 0 – 0.6
8
Airfoil Selection Airfoils Selection Criteria:
Low drag over range of specified cl values Easy construction Round Leading Edge Relatively Flat Bottom Easy to construct on tabletop Constructible Trailing Edge
9
Airfoil Selection Region of Interest Clark Y Clark Y Airfoil is Best
10
Clark Y Airfoil Geometry Drag Polar cl vs a cl vs. a cd vs. cl
dcl/da = 5.66
11
Total Lift and Drag Coefficient Estimation
CL – Found at cruise, can be obtained at any a cl - Found using lifting line theory Drag: CD = CDi + CDp CDi found using lifting line theory, can be obtained at any a From Drag Polar of airfoil (cl vs. cd), cdp can be obtained and integrated to obtain CDp for the entire wing
12
Parasitic Drag Calculation
Used Polynomial Function to Fit Airfoil’s Drag Polar
13
Parasitic Drag Calculation
Plugged wing cl distribution into polynomial function to get corresponding parasitic cd distribution along span
14
Parasitic Drag Calculation
Integrated Parasitic Drag Distribution Along Span to get 3-D Wing Parasitic Drag CDp = .0059
15
Total Wing Drag Coefficient
CD = CDi + CDp CD = = .0190
16
(empirically based from Roskam Part II, p. 154)
Wing Characteristics Wing Sweep = 0º Taper Ratio = 1 Dihedral Angle = 5º AR = 5 S = 40 ft2 Tail Airfoil = NACA 0012 (empirically based from Roskam Part II, p. 154) (subject of future trade study)
17
Wing Characteristics
18
Coming Attractions… CLmax Control Surface Sizing Tail Sizing
19
Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.