Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLoreen Webb Modified over 6 years ago
1
A Preliminary Study on the Effect of Melancholic Music On EEG Asymmetry
Aaron Raymond See Department of Electrical Engineering Southern Taiwan University STUT BMEC 7/6/2018
2
Outline Introduction Methodology Preliminary Results Conclusions
STUT BMEC Outline Introduction Methodology Preliminary Results Conclusions References 7/6/2018
3
Introduction Over 30 years…. EEG asymmetry Emotional states
STUT BMEC Introduction Over 30 years…. EEG asymmetry Emotional states Psychophysiological conditions From: Carvalho A et al (2011) Journal of Affective Disorders, 129, pp Allen J (2004) Biological Psychology, 67, pp.1-5 7/6/2018
4
Introduction STUT BMEC
Fig. 1 Frontal EEG asymmetry as a moderator. Model adapted from Baron and Kenney (1986). From: Coan J and Allen J (2004) Biological Psychology, 67:7-49. 7/6/2018
5
Introduction Effects of relatively greater left frontal activity:
STUT BMEC Introduction Effects of relatively greater left frontal activity: General appetitive Approachable Behavioral activation Motivational 7/6/2018
6
Introduction Effects of greater right frontal activity
STUT BMEC Introduction Effects of greater right frontal activity General avoidance Withdrawal behaviors Fear Anxiety 7/6/2018
7
Introduction EEG asymmetry measurement
STUT BMEC Introduction EEG asymmetry measurement Index computed through the difference between the natural logarithm of the left hemisphere alpha power from right hemisphere alpha power = ln(right alpha power) – ln(left alpha power) From: Coan J and Allen J (2004) Biological Psychology, 67:7-49. Jetha M et al (2009) International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72: 7/6/2018
8
Introduction STUT BMEC
Fig. 2 Scatterplots of the relation between EEG alpha asymmetry (ln right hemisphere minus ln left hemisphere power) in the frontal regions for eyes-open and eyes closed conditions. From: Jetha M et al (2009) International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72: 7/6/2018
9
STUT BMEC Introduction The factors may be considered as an index for the risk of anxiety and depression. Fig. 3 Spectral asymmetry index values averaged over a group of depressive and control subjects From: Coan J and Allen J (2004) Biological Psychology, 67:7-49. Smit DJA et al (2007) Biological Psychology, 74: Hinrikus H et al (2009) Med Biol Eng Comput, 47: 7/6/2018
10
Introduction STUT BMEC
Fig. 4 Frontal asymmetry (mean and sd) in normal, remmitted and depressed elderly subjects. From: Carvalho et al. Journal of Affective Disorders, 129, pp , 2011. 7/6/2018
11
STUT BMEC Introduction Music was found to be correlated with emotional experience. Fig. 5 Differences among four musical excerpts on left and right frontal EEG alpha power From: Schmidt L and Trainor et al (2001) Cognition and Emotion, 14: 7/6/2018
12
STUT BMEC Introduction Objective: To determine the effects on EEG asymmetry of resting EEG after listening to melancholic music. 7/6/2018
13
Methodology Subjects: 3 Male University Students Mean Age 20 Yrs Old
STUT BMEC Methodology Subjects: 3 Male University Students Mean Age 20 Yrs Old Experimental procedure: Divided into 3 parts 1st measure continuous resting eyes closed EEG 10 mins 2nd listen to melancholic songs no EEG recording 10 mins 3rd measure continuous resting eyes closed EEG 10 mins 7/6/2018
14
Methodology Nu Amps Express of NeuroScan Company
STUT BMEC Methodology Nu Amps Express of NeuroScan Company 16 channels were placed according to the system Impedance was kept at 5 kΩ The channels recorded are composed of the following: Fp1, Fp2, F3, F4, C3, and C4 Bandpass filtered using: Hz Sampling Frequency: 1000 Hz 7/6/2018
15
Methodology Harmonic parameter extraction:
STUT BMEC Methodology Harmonic parameter extraction: Beta, Alpha, Theta, Delta Single side power of each harmonic parameter Power is normalize Asymmetry index ln[right alpha] – ln[left alpha] 7/6/2018
16
Fig. 6 EEG asymmetry of subject 1
STUT BMEC Preliminary Results 7/6/2018 Fig. 6 EEG asymmetry of subject 1
17
Fig. 7 EEG asymmetry of subject 2
STUT BMEC Preliminary Results 7/6/2018 Fig. 7 EEG asymmetry of subject 2
18
Fig. 8 EEG asymmetry of subject 3
STUT BMEC Preliminary Results 7/6/2018 Fig. 8 EEG asymmetry of subject 3
19
Fig. 9 Average EEG asymmetry of 3 subjects
STUT BMEC Preliminary Results 7/6/2018 Fig. 9 Average EEG asymmetry of 3 subjects
20
Table 1. EEG asymmetry index comparison
STUT BMEC Preliminary Results Table 1. EEG asymmetry index comparison Subject 1 Left Right Before After Beta 9.66 15.57 9.77 15.70 Alpha 36.01 39.49 33.17 38.15 Theta 52.63 43.42 55.46 44.71 Delta 1.70 1.53 1.60 1.45 7/6/2018
21
Fig. 10 EEG asymmetry comparison
STUT BMEC Preliminary Results 7/6/2018 Fig. 10 EEG asymmetry comparison
22
STUT BMEC Conclusions Melancholic music presented to the subjects were able to display observable changes in the EEG asymmetry indexes and the normalized power of the harmonic parameters. The asymmetry indexes were brought closer to the baseline after listening to the set of music. Beta power increase and decrease were observed to affect theta changes. 7/6/2018
23
STUT BMEC Conclusions More experiments may determine new methods to provide a definitive test on emotional and psychological states. 7/6/2018
24
STUT BMEC Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the financial support from National Science Council of Taiwan on grant number NSC E 7/6/2018
25
STUT BMEC References P. Possel, (2008) Biological Psychology, 78: Wheeler RE et al (1993) Psychophysiology, 30: 82–89. Coan J and Allen J (2004) Biological Psychology, 67: 7-49. Jones NA, Field T, and Davalos M (1998) Infant behavior and Development, 21: 527–530. Coan JA, Allen JJ B ( 2003) The Asymmetrical Brain, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 565–615. Davidson RJ (1993) Cognition and Emotion 7: 115–138. Harmon-Jones E and Allen JJ B (1997) Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106: 159–163. Hinrikus H et al (2009) Med Biol Eng Comput, 47: Grin-Yatsenko et al (2010) Clinical Neurophysiology, 121: 7/6/2018
26
References Harmon-Jones E, Gable P A, and Peterson C K (2010) Biological Psychology, 84: Lin YP et al (2010) Neuroreport, 21: Sokhadze E (2007) Applied Pyschophysiology and Biofeedback, 32: Carvalho A et al (2011) Journal of Affective Disorders, 129: Allen J (2004) Biological Psychology, 67: 1-5 . Jetha M et al (2009) International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72: Smit DJA et al (2007) Biological Psychology, 74: Schmidt L and Trainor et al (2001) Cognition and Emotion, 14: 7/6/2018
27
Thank you for your attention!
STUT BMEC Thank you for your attention! 7/6/2018
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.