Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Introduction to Seismology

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Introduction to Seismology"— Presentation transcript:

1 Introduction to Seismology
Geology 5640/6640 Introduction to Seismology 3 Feb 2017 Last time: The Equations of Motion (Wave Equation!) • Any imbalance of stress will be offset by acceleration (Newton’s 2nd: ). This leads to the dynamic equations of motion: We neglect the body force fi (for now) and express in terms of displacement, by substituting Hooke’s law and the definition of the strain tensor. This results in the P-wave equation: in which  is the propagation velocity: Read for Mon 2 Feb: S&W (§2.4); © A.R. Lowry 2017

2 We arrived at the P-wave equation using
by taking the derivative with respect to xi and summing over i. We could instead take derivatives with respect to xj and by a similar set of steps arrive at: the S-wave equation, in which the S-wave propagation velocity is given by Note the important implication: For the P-wave we have dilatation, but no shear; for the S-wave we have shear, but no dilatation!

3 • Here and represent the
propagation velocities for the P and S waves respectively. • Changes in elastic properties contribute more to velocity variation than changes in density • Velocity is sensitive to rock chemistry, packing structure, porosity & fluid type, pressure and temperature. The tricky part is distinguishing which we’re seeing…

4 Rock properties that affect seismic velocity include: • Porosity
• Rock composition • Pressure • Temperature • Fluid saturation = Vp,  = Vs are much more sensitive to  and  than to  Crustal Rocks Mantle Rocks

5 Seismic velocity depends on a lot of fields, but not all
are independent: Velocity Temperature Composition Partial Melt Pressure Porosity/Fluid Density And some fields can be determined to within small uncertainty (e.g. pressure at given depth)

6

7 So now we have our expressions for the wave equation in
terms of displacements: Question is, how do we solve these? Solution is simplified by expressing displacements in terms of displacement potentials. Helmholtz’ decomposition theorem holds that any vector field can be expressed in terms of a vector potential and a scalar potential  as: In our application,  is a scalar displacement potential associated with the P-wave, and is a vector displacement potential associated with the S-wave.

8 It’s first worth noting a pair of useful vector identities:
Then, if we substitute our potentials into our P-wave equation: Rearranging: And hence:

9 Similarly, substituting potentials into the S-wave equation:
Here we take advantage of another vector identity: Rearranging: And hence:

10 So what’s the point of this? We want to find some
solution, e.g. for P-wave displacement potential, that allows for separation of variables: The eigenfunctions for a partial differential equation of this form (i.e., functions which, if plugged into the equation, will yield solutions of similar form) are: (called the “d’Alembert solution”). Here, i is the imaginary number A is amplitude  is angular frequency 2/T (& T is time period) k is spatial wavenumber 2/ (&  is wavelength)

11 So let’s plug into and see what we get after differentiating: Similarly,

12 Dividing both sides of the equation by
we’re left with: as a solution to the P-wave equation! Here it’s useful to recall that k is a vector, and so it has a magnitude and a direction: This is called the wavenumber vector or wave vector, and it describes the direction and (inverse) spatial wavelength of a propagating plane wave. Noting that  = 2f, you may recognize this as  = f! x3 k k3 x2 k1 k2 x1


Download ppt "Introduction to Seismology"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google