1. Comparison of Propofol and Ketamine-Propofol Mixture (Ketofol) on Laryngeal Tube- Suction II Conditions and Hemodynamics: A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Trial 
Ulku Ozgul, MD, Zekine Begec, MD, Kalender Karahan, MD, Mehmet Ali Erdogan, MD, Mustafa Said Aydogan, MD, Cemil Colak, PhD, Mahmut Durmus, MD, M. Ozcan Ersoy, MD 
Current Therapeutic Research 
Volume 75, Pages (December 2013)
DOI: /j.curtheres
Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
The changes in mean (SD) in heart rate with ketamine–propofol mixture (ketofol) and propofol use. t0 = before induction; t1 = immediately following induction; t2 = immediately following laryngeal tube-Suction II (LTS II) placement; t3 = 3 minutes after LTS II placement; t4 = 5 minutes after LTS II placement; t5 = 10 minutes after LTS II placement. *P < 0.01 compared with baseline values in Group P. †P < compared with baseline values in Group K.
Current Therapeutic Research  , 39-43DOI: ( /j.curtheres )
Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
The changes in mean (SD) in mean arterial pressure (MAP) with ketamine–propofol mixture (ketofol) and propofol use. t0 = Before induction; t1 = immediately following induction; t2 = immediately following laryngeal tube-Suction II placement; t3 = 3 minutes after laryngeal tube-Suction II placement; t4 = 5 minutes after laryngeal tube-Suction II placement; t5 = 10 minutes after laryngeal tube-Suction II placement. *P < 0.01 compared with baseline values; †P < 0.05 between groups.
Current Therapeutic Research  , 39-43DOI: ( /j.curtheres )
Copyright © 2013 The Authors Terms and Conditions