Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1. Experiment 1A: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS females of water and maltodextrin (MD-6) and maltodextrin-sucralose (MD-6 + SUX) mixtures. In this and.

Published byGodfrey McCarthy Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1. Experiment 1A: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS females of water and maltodextrin (MD-6) and maltodextrin-sucralose (MD-6 + SUX) mixtures. In this and."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1. Experiment 1A: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS females of water and maltodextrin (MD-6) and maltodextrin-sucralose (MD-6 + SUX) mixtures. In this and in Figures 2-12, tastants are shown on the x-axis in the order in which they were tested (except where noted otherwise). From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

2 Figure 2. Experiment 1B: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS females and males of water and of maltodextrin (MD-6) and maltodextrin-sucralose (MD-6 + SUX) mixtures with and without sugars (glucose + maltose) added. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

3 Figure 3. Experiment 1C: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of maltodextrin-sucralose (MD-6 + SUX) mixtures with more sugar (glucose) added. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

4 Figure 4. Experiment 1D: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of Splenda. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

5 Figure 5. Experiment 1D: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of maltodextrin (Malto) in 3 tests. Testing order was balanced for the first 2 tests (plain MD-6 or Polycose); the third test was with a Polycose/sucralose (Poly + SUX) mixture. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

6 Figure 6. Experiment 2A: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of low concentrations of stevia. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

7 Figure 7. Experiment 2B: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of higher concentrations of stevia. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

8 Figure 8. Experiment 2C: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females of water and of rebaudioside A.
From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

9 Figure 9. Experiment 2D: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of water and of 0.1 g/L stevia versus 0–7.5 g/L sucrose. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

10 Figure 12. Experiment 3B: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of 5 sweeteners.
From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

11 Figure 11. Experiment 3A: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of acesulfame potassium (Ace K) versus water. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

12 Figure 10. Experiment 2E: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS and HiS females and males of 1 g/L stevia versus 0–20 g/L sucrose. From: Sweetener Intake by Rats Selectively Bred for Differential Saccharin Intake: Sucralose, Stevia, and Acesulfame Potassium Chem Senses. 2017;42(5): doi: /chemse/bjx017 Chem Senses | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

Download ppt "Figure 1. Experiment 1A: Mean (±SEM) intake by LoS females of water and maltodextrin (MD-6) and maltodextrin-sucralose (MD-6 + SUX) mixtures. In this and."

Similar presentations

From: An open day in the metric space

From: An open day in the metric space
Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates

Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates
From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.
Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Fig. 1 Graphical representation
Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.

Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.
Figure 1. Scree plot for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Death Depression Scale (DDS). From: Development and psychometric evaluation of a.

Figure 1. Scree plot for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Death Depression Scale (DDS). From: Development and psychometric evaluation of a.
Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.
Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.
Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.

Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.
From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution
Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.

Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.
Figure 1. Financial income in Germany (% of GDP)

Figure 1. Financial income in Germany (% of GDP)
Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.
Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.

Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.
Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.

Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.
Figure 1 Theoretical link between welfare state policy and fear of crime From: Social Insecurities and Fear of Crime: A Cross-National Study on the Impact.

Figure 1 Theoretical link between welfare state policy and fear of crime From: Social Insecurities and Fear of Crime: A Cross-National Study on the Impact.
Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.

Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework.

Figure 1. Conceptual framework.
Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.

Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google