1. RELIGIOUS SUPPORT FACILITIES
UNCLASSIFIED
Headquarters, Department of the Army
Office of the Chief of Chaplains
Chaplain Corps Resource Management: Develop and Refine Relationships and Resources
RELIGIOUS SUPPORT FACILITIES
Presenter:
Mr. Glenn Coe, IMCOM HQ

2. AGENDA
Army Facility Investment Strategy (FIS)
Facility Sustainment, Restoration, Modernization (SRM)
Installation Status Report – Infrastructure (ISR-I)

3. Army Facility Investment Strategy
Sustain what we need: Maintain the existing facilities to achieve the designed lifespan. Why? This avoids costly repairs or premature need for new construction.
Dispose of what we don’t need: Demolish or mothball buildings that are in serious disrepair. Eliminate relocatable buildings and failing WWII wood. Consolidate units into Army-approved space allocation. Why? This avoids costly use of energy and high maintenance. (HQDA EXORD , 26 Mar 15, “Reduce the Installation Facility Footprint.”)
Improve what we will keep: Restore and modernize the most needed facilities, extending the lifespan and improving their mission functionality and energy efficiency. Why? This avoids costly new construction.
Build-out facility requirements, but only the most critical: "Military Construction will only be used for our highest priorities after careful analysis leaves this as the Army's best solution." Why? This avoids excess footprint, high operations and maintenance costs and building low-priority facilities.
The Army spent some $4.2B in FY15 O&M funding to sustain installation facilities and utility services. The objective of the DA EXORD (26 Mar 15) was to get senior commanders to improve real property accountability, review facility utilization and reduce the footprint by eliminating under-used or unused facilities from the inventory.
-----Original Message-----
From: Halverson, David D LTG USARMY HQDA ACSIM (US)
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, :36 AM
Subject: Reduce the Facility Footprint (UNCLASSIFIED)
Importance: High
Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE
Commanders,
I want to highlight to you the recently published Army EXORD on Reducing the
Facility Footprint. Since there are no DoD authorities to reduce
Installations presently, it is imperative that we find ways to reduce
installation
footprints to reduce facility and utility costs. The Army needs your help
to review the space allocations on your installation, consolidate your
forces into the best facilities using only the minimal authorized space and
then eliminate underutilized and excess facilities in order to reduce costs.
The ALARACT went out on SIPR from the G-33, but I asked to send it out on
NIPR soonest.
In today's fiscally constrained environment, we must optimize the use of
existing facilities and reduce our real property footprint to support the
changing force structure and reduce sustainment and energy/utilities costs.
I look forward to partnering with you on this important initiative
Army Strong! Support & Defend. Here to serve.
Vr, DDH
CH Yvonne Hudson:
“Recommend you only push for demolition of wood structures and buildings that
are falling down and not in use.
If you aren't using it and it is abandoned, you can encourage the Garrison
to take off the religious education coding at a minimum.
This will keep it from being held against your worship/religious education
space utilization.
And no, we don't have money for demolition:-) Sorry about that. And sadly
no dollars for buildings:-(
Army Facility Management, 1 June 2015: OASCIM > IMCOM, AMC, USAR, ARNG

4. Religious Facility Real Property Inventory
What is our footprint?
What are our facility category codes?
IMCOM is tracking 344 permanent, semi-permanent and temporary religious facilities with a 2.6 million square footprint.
Chapels 73017
Religious Education 73018
Family Life 73019
Reduce the footprint, consolidate services (intense focus on target audience), save $ on maintenance costs, utilities, and reduce manpower workload.

5. Installation Status Report – Infrastructure (ISR-I)
WHAT IS ISR? Through ISR, each installation’s conditions and performance are assessed against Army-wide standards in three areas: Infrastructure, Environment, and Services. The data is consolidated quarterly, reviewed, and approved at the installation, forwarded to the ACOM/DRU level for review, and then forwarded to HQDA. At DA level, the data is reviewed, consolidated, and used in decision support.
ISR-I assesses religious facility infrastructure at each installation to evaluate quality and functionality, calculate costs to improve, and build out the requirement shortfall. lt establishes the criteria that justifies “Sustainment” resources against open Work Orders (WO) and/or leverage for more costly R&M projects.

6. ISR-Web Training

7. ISR-Infrastructure – Service Facilities
Select ISR Infrastructure
Select ISR-I Inspection Standards
this will open a LONG list of Inspection Standards
Select item 53 – Service Facilities
Download or Print this document
the digital version automatically calculates results
Use following Category Codes (CATCODE) for Religious Facilities:
73017 – Chapels
73018 – Religious Education
Facilities
73019 – Family Life Facilities

8. Annual ISR-Infrastructure (ISR-I) Inspection

9. Installation ISR-Web Input
ISR Centralized Database
Uses real property inventory, ASIP data and UIC data (including projected stationing packages) to determine installation facility requirements
Installation ISR-Web Input
Religious Facility Component Ratings
Booklet
Real Property Planning and Analysis System (RPLANS)
Automated master planning tool that gathers real property data, force structure data, planning criteria, and allowances from standard Army corporate databases. It is an integral part of the Army’s legacy planning systems along with the Facilities Planning System (FPS), the Installation Status Report (ISR), the Integrated Facilities System (IFS), the Army Stationing and Installation Plan (ASIP), and the Executive Information System (EIS).
Viewable from the installation, IMCOM region, IMCOM HQ and HQDA levels, providing various levels of detail.
Outputs: Installation Reports
Quality Q-Ratings
Quantity C-Ratings
Mission F-Ratings
Readiness C-Ratings
Improvement Costs
Construction Costs

10. Installation Management Command
Installation Status Report – Infrastructure (ISR-I)
INPUTS to Facilities Requirements
Unit / Organization Mission Analysis
ASIP Force Structure Analysis
Geographic Analysis
Existing Facilities Adequacy Analysis
Required Facilities Analysis
Existing Installation Master Plan Consideration
Land Use Analysis
Facility Criteria Analysis
Infrastructure Analysis
Environmental Analysis
Outputs of Facilities Requirements
Identification of Requirements Issues
Requirements Issue Resolution or Alternatives
Specific Course of Action (COA) Recommendations
Course of Action Justification Development
Preparatory Material for DD1391 Development
Installation Master Plan Impact Analysis
Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) Cost Estimations
Project Scopes
Site and Facility Plans
Support to the installation in ensuring the requirements are entered into the Real Property Planning and Analysis System

11. Examples of Sustainment, Restoration and Modernization
IMCOM G4 did a search of chapel SRM projects out through 2017 and the only current project is a maintenance & repair project in Italy.

12. Sustainment = Facility Inspections & DPW Work Requests (DA Form 4283) for Routine Maintenance
DPW Signature Card: Self Help projects, Eagle Scout approved projects. Special events get backlogged WOs magically pushed through!

13. Installation Management Command
REFERENCES
AR : The Army Installation Status Report Program
AR 420-1: Army Facilities Management
IMCOM Garrison Chaplain Handbook (Feb 2016)
Mr. Glenn Coe, HQ Installation Management Command
Religious Support Office – Operations Team
(210)

14. END OF BRIEF
Questions or Comments?

15. Installation Management Command
BACKUP SLIDES

16. Installation Management Command
Military Construction

17. Installation Management Command
Military Construction

18. Installation Management Command

19. Installation Management Command
Legacy MILCON Issues
Army:
OCCH, IMCOM Chaplain, IMCOM G-4 not in actual construction planning process
Audio-Visual not part of MILCON
No notification of Proponent when changes to blueprints/standard model, or funding occurs
IMCOM
Resourcing issues with OMA Tail
Master Planning Charrette During this workshop, a list of projects is developed with complete definition of project scope, analyzing the customer’s mission requirements and customer preferences, while balancing these against Army Allowance and Programming Criteria. The workshop captures the associated costs and requirement dates for each of the projects. The list of projects is also prioritized during the charrette.
Garrison
Untrained personnel at the planning table
Failure to collaborate and keep higher informed (1391 justification, OMA Tail, etc)