Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

<month year> IEEE P xxxx g July 2009

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "<month year> IEEE P xxxx g July 2009"— Presentation transcript:

1 <month year> IEEE P xxxx g July 2009 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Guide to PHY Band Adaptation] Date Submitted: [July 2009] Source: [Cristina Seibert] Company [Silver Spring Networks] [Britton Sanderford] Company [Sensus] Address [] Voice [] silverspringnet.com] Re: [] Abstract: This document provides guidance for mapping the TG4g PHY into other frequency bands, subject to regulatory constraints in the bands.] Purpose: Informative Document Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P Cristina Seibert, Britton Sanderford <author>, <company>

2 July 2009 Problem Statement Provide unified methodology of mapping band parameters to design parameters for TG4g PHY Future proofing the standard Future band allocation Changes in regulations Flexibility and simplicity Support options including on channel spacing Uncluttered specification Complement regulatory representation work, for example, as laid out in Representation/storage vs. usage of regulatory info Solution captured in document # , submitted to mentor and on reflector since June Cristina Seibert, Britton Sanderford

3 Challenges Radio designs becoming increasingly band agnostic
July 2009 Challenges Radio designs becoming increasingly band agnostic Identify and map regulatory parameters of interest: Maximum transmit power Out of band emission requirements Performance/coverage issues: Maximum transmit power constraints High frequency bands Mitigation techniques High density deployments Use more directive and/or higher antennas, better receivers Data rate reduction Cristina Seibert, Britton Sanderford

4 July 2009 Out of Band Emissions Guard band = minimum frequency separation from nearest carrier to band edge to enforce carrier + phase noise below power emission limits. Guard band allocation, as a function of: emission limit rules carrier transmit power phase noise and carrier attenuation profile transmit filter and PLL design Refer to guard band as G, emission power limit as Pemission, maximum transmit power of nearest carrier as M(Nnearest), attenuation per unit of frequency as A: Example in g Cristina Seibert, Britton Sanderford

5 July 2009 Channel Planning The channel plan can be expressed with the following equation: where Where total channel bandwidth (or spacing) is C, channel index N, the carrier frequency as a function of the channel index is F(N), the start of the frequency band is S, the width of the available band is W, the maximum allowed transmit power on each channel is M(N), the maximum transmit power in the band is P, the allocated guard bands is GL on the low side of the band and GH on the high side of the band. Cristina Seibert, Britton Sanderford

6 July 2009 Transmit Power Alternatively or in combination with guard band allocation, the power in the channels near the band edges can be lowered to accommodate out of band emission requirements. Let us refer to this as PN,lower The maximum transmit power of a channel is given by: M(N) = { P if N >> 0 and N << , else PN,lower } Cristina Seibert, Britton Sanderford

7 July 2009 Non-Contiguous Bands The above analysis applies to frequency bands where channel planning can take place (for example, where W >> C). The leveraging of non-contiguous bands, such as white spaces desirable For non contiguous spectrum, plan each piece of spectrum i individually, and then concatenate over i Channel plan: Cristina Seibert, Britton Sanderford

8 802.11 Regulatory Classes in US
July 2009 Regulatory Classes in US Reg. class Channel Starting Freq (GHz) Channel Spacing (MHz) Channel set Transmit Power Limit (mW) Emission limit set Behavior limit set 1 5 20 36,40,44,48 40 1,2 2 52,56,60,64 200 3 149,153,157,161 800 Cristina Seibert, Britton Sanderford

9 July 2009 Conclusions Method for PHY adaptation to different bands, regulations, design parameters such as channel spacing Offer closed form solutions for: channel plan maximum transmit power guard band allocation Method extends to non contiguous spectrum Guide complementary to regulatory work in other task/working groups including Cristina Seibert, Britton Sanderford

10 Present and Likely Future Bands
July 2009 Present and Likely Future Bands Frequency Band List 314 – 316 MHz 700 MHz 928 – 960 MHz 316 – 433 MHz 780 – TBD MHz 950 – MHz MHz 863 – 870 MHz 1427 – 1432 MHz – MHz 896 – 901 MHz 1605 – 1625 MHz MHz 901 – 902 MHz 2400 – 2483 MHz 470 – 510 MHz 902 – 928 MHz Cristina Seibert, Britton Sanderford

11 * 1 Byte Provides Sufficient BW Coverage
July 2009 Table Based Channel List Allows Open Form Solution And Dynamic Shunting Of Hop Channels Channel Step Size * 1 Byte Provides Sufficient BW Coverage @ 6.25 kHz 1.6 MHz @ 12.5 kHz 3.2 MHz @ 25 kHz 6.4 MHz @ 50 kHz 12.8 MHz @ 100 kHz 25.6 MHz @ 200 kHz 51 MHz @ 300 kHz 76.8 MHz Base Frequency, Any Band: 22 Bits provide 1 kHz res. Channel Step Size: 13 Bits provide 50 Hz res. Hop Frequency Hop Table; Skip A Hop = 00 1 1 Byte; Represents Desired Freq Channel (see Below *) 2 1 Byte 3 4 83 1 Byte; Return to Hop #1 = FF Cristina Seibert, Britton Sanderford


Download ppt "<month year> IEEE P xxxx g July 2009"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google