Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byDarlene Williamson Modified over 6 years ago
1
How to do R&D impact analysis and write the case studies
Liangzhi You, Catherine Ragasa
2
Outline Data requirements Possible sources of data
Outline of the case study write-up
3
Problem statement What are you aiming to evaluate?
To evaluate a technology To evaluate the impact of R&D investment To evaluate the impact of NARI To evaluate the impact of a project Scope Impact of a single variety (compared to best available variety) Impact of modern varieties (compared with best local variety) Impact of research program (compared with best variety prior to program) Timeframe (if analyzing system or research program; ex-ante and ex-post) Scale National, regional Selected parts of the country (a small project or small competitive grants) Spillover (part of the intended benefits and costs of the investments or incidental?)
4
Data Needs ADEQUATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE FOCUS COMMODITY
Production of the focus commodity (time series or growth rate) Consumption of the focus commodity (time series or growth rate) Market Price Type of market for the commodity Small open economy (price is dictated by world prices) Closed economy (no trade) Horizontal multimarket Policies affecting the commodity Tax/subsidy specific to the commodity Fertilizer subsidy (50% of fertilizer price, and fertilizer price is 10% of cost, and 8% of value of output, therefore 4%)
5
Data needs (2) UNDERSTANDING OF FOCUS TECHNOLOGY
Single variety, series of varieties, technology package, agronomic practices Counterfactual technology For single variety, counterfactual the best older variety For all modern varieties, counterfactual is the best traditional variety For WAAPP-funded varieties, counterfactual is the best modern variety before WAAPP Change in yield (new versus counter) Other changes Reduced production cost (Bt maize led to reduced pesticide cost) Change in output price Price premium (biofortified crops)
6
Data needs (3) ADEQUATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE R&D PROCESS/BREEDING PROGRAM R&D time lag (years to develop a technology) R&D cost Go back to what technology or series of technologies are being evaluated What was the cost of developing those? For example, WAAPP-released cassava varieties, total cost of WAAAP program in the country
7
Case Study of the Impact of Maize Research in WCA
Problem statement, scope, scale, and timeframe Economic and poverty reduction impacts of maize research in West and Central Africa over the period 1971–2005 Ex post analysis
8
Data on Commodity Production data
Simplistic assumptions on consumption (no effect on consumption)
9
Data on Technology Technology: focus on varieties (379 modern varieties released) Yield: data from regional and on-farm variety evaluation trials to estimate the genetic yield gains attributable to maize research
10
Adoption (expert opinion)
11
Data on R&D investments
12
Other assumptions Supply elasticity: (based on Mono province, Benin (Honfoga 1993)) No assumptions on demand elasticity, consumption Policy (subsidies) is reflected in the growth rate in production and area of maize (no need to put as a separate parameter) Price: world price of maize Research lag (10 years for international research; 5 years for NARS) Cost: (international); (NARS) Benefits: Varieties released: Focus on varieties (specify that improved agronomic practices may also be a product of the R&D investment made during that time period)
13
Enter the parameters in DREAM
14
Source of Germplasm (Attribution of Benefits)
15
Attribution of benefits
16
Poverty impacts
18
Sensitivity analysis Parameter changed Change
Effect of Net Benefit (B-C) Effect on ROR Yield gain Reduced by half -48% -23% Supply elasticity From 0.45 to 1 -54% -26% Extension cost Twice the research costs -69% Flow of benefits To from +31%
19
Generic outline of a case study
Introduction Data Source Method Benefits Costs Rates of return Sensitivity analysis Conclusion and Implications
20
Introduction Motivation of the study
Why we are doing the study? What development goal does it address? Who will use this? Background about the commodity and about the technologies Commodity Technology
21
Data Source All sources of information and data used
Survey (sampling method, sample size, etc.) Rapid appraisal Expert opinion Secondary data Focus group interviews Or combinations Specify assumptions made
22
Method Economic surplus approach (describe a bit)
Model (describe a bit) Software: DREAM
23
Benefits Changes in producer’s income
Adoption (area planted or applied with the technology) Yield advantage of new technology compared to counterfactual Other advantages of new technology compared to counterfactual Changes in price Changes in prices paid by consumer Attribution of benefits Who invested and contributed? Source of germplasm?
24
Rates of Return Costs Rates of Return (from DREAM) Poverty impacts
Stream of costs or investments Rates of Return (from DREAM) Comparing the flow of benefits with costs (considering time lag in research) Internal rates of return Poverty impacts
25
Sensitivity Analysis Very important
The idea is to change the assumptions or parameters used, depending on how reliable the available data are: Assumption on adoption Assumption on yield advantage Assumption on elasticities Assumption on price changes Limitation of the study Other benefits and costs that cannot be quantified (increase in scientist’s capacity, environmental impacts)
26
Conclusions and Implications
Why this study was conducted? Brief summary of key findings Implications Practical recommendations (what do you think needs to be emphasized or changed?)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.