Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Drug Abuse Treatment as HIV Prevention: The State of the Science

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Drug Abuse Treatment as HIV Prevention: The State of the Science"— Presentation transcript:

1 Drug Abuse Treatment as HIV Prevention: The State of the Science
David S. Metzger, Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania Center for Studies of Addiction HIV Prevention Research Division Philadelphia, PA

2 Overview Drug driven epidemics -- overview
Prevention impacts of drug treatment Drug treatment, access, and adherence to HIV care Challenges in maximizing the public health impact of drug treatment

3 Current AIDS epidemiology
Approximately 33,000,000 living with HIV/AIDS Over 10,000,000 infections among IDU Outside of Africa, over 33% of all new infections are estimated to be attributable to injection drug use No estimates of non-injection drug use

4 Australia & N. Zealand: 0.19m
Estimated size of IDU population E. Europe & C. Asia: 3.2m N. America 1.43m W. Europe: 1.24m E. Asia & Pacific 2.35m Caribbean: 0.028m MENA:0.44m S. & S-E Asia: 3.33m S. Saharan-Africa 0.009m Australia & N. Zealand: 0.19m L. America: 0.97m 10.3m (78%) in developing/transitional countries 91% of the world adult population (4 billion) is covered by the data. Information unavailable for 119 countries. UN Reference Group on HIV/AIDS prevention and care among IDU

5 What drugs are most commonly injected?
Opiates ATS Opiates Cocaine ATS Opiates ATS Opiates ATS Opiates Cocaine Opiates Opiates ATS Opiates ATS Opiates ATS Cocaine

6 IDUs as Percent of Total Registered HIV Cases
Eastern Europe and Central Asian Countries, 2007 Countries with Injection Driven Epidemics, OSI, 2008

7 IDUs as Percent of Total Registered HIV Cases
East and South East Asian Countries, 2007 Source: UNAIDS 2008 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic

8 Dependence is a medical condition with common Dx and consequences: ASI Composite Scores: Porto Alegre, Philadelphia and Wuhan

9

10

11 Substance-related HIV transmission
Direct and indirect sharing of injection equipment and materials Unprotected sexual activity Consequences of substance use in all risk groups: MSMs, IDUs, Heterosexuals

12 HIV prevention strategies for drug using populations
Education about HIV transmission HIV counseling and testing Increased access to sterile injection resources and condoms Drug treatment HIV treatment

13 How does drug treatment prevent HIV infection and transmission?
Effective treatments reduce the frequency of drug use Fewer drug-related risk behaviors Fewer new infections Increased access to HIV treatment and primary care Increased adherence to HIV medications

14 How does drug treatment prevent HIV infection and transmission?
Effective treatments reduce the frequency of drug use Fewer drug-related risk behaviors Fewer new infections

15 Percent of subjects reporting injection prior to, during, and
following methadone treatment 20 40 60 80 100 Injection Injection Injection Injection Injection Prior to Tx After Tx in Prior in Prior in Year Entry Entry Year Month After Tx (Ball and Ross, 1991)

16 Injection rates 12 months following
treatment entry by retention status (Thiede,Hagan,and Murrill, 2000)

17 Drug use and injection among 557 heroin users by methadone treatment status, Sichuan Province, China
(Han-Zhu Qian et al, 2008)

18 Study outcomes: opiate abstinence
Schottenfeld, R.S., Chawarski, M.C., & Mazlan, M. Lancet 2008, 371: 2192–200

19 How does drug treatment prevent HIV infection and transmission?
Effective treatments reduce the frequency of drug use Fewer drug-related risk behaviors Fewer new infections

20 Rate of needle sharing reported by In-Treatment IDUs compared to
Out-of-Treatment IDUs 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Selwyn Martin Klee Williams Longshore Metzger Stark Capplehorn et al et al et al et al et al et al et al et al 1987 1990 1991 1992 1993 1993 1994 1995

21 Needle sharing among 557 heroin users by methadone treatment status, Sichuan Province, China
(Han-Zhu Qian et al, 2008)

22 How does drug treatment prevent HIV infection and transmission?
Effective treatments reduce the frequency of drug use Fewer drug-related risk behaviors Fewer new infections

23 HIV prevalence rates among New York IDUs by methadone treatment
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 87% 10% 86 Active Users 35 Long Term MM (MMRW, 1984)

24 Six year HIV infection rates by treatment status at time of enrollment

25 (Metzger et al. 1993)

26 Incidence of HBV and HCV 12 Months Following Treatment Entry
(Thiede,Hagan,and Murrill, 2000)

27 Agonist treatment is more than substitution
Safe, stable dosing Drug use monitored Drug counseling Access to other services

28

29 Naltrexone and drug counseling treatment in St. Petersburg
1,0 N+F ,9 N+P ,8 F+P P+P ,7 Percent remaining in Treatment N+F>P+P ,6 N+F>F+P N+P>P+P ,5 N+P>F+P F+P=P+P ,4 N+F=N+P ,3 ,2 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 Weeks

30 Buprenorphine/Naloxone offers new opportunities for treatment in HIV care settings
Partial agonist, longer half-life Reduced risk of overdose Less severe withdrawal Fewer interactions with anti-retrovirals

31 Maintenance treatment with buprenorphine and naltrexone for heroin dependence in Malaysia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Schottenfeld, R.S., Chawarski, M.C., & Mazlan, M. Lancet 2008, 371: 2192–200

32 Maintenance treatment with buprenorphine, naltrexone, and counseling for heroin dependence in Malaysia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Schottenfeld, R.S., Chawarski, M.C., & Mazlan, M. Lancet 2008, 371: 2192–200

33 Study outcomes: opiate abstinence
Schottenfeld, R.S., Chawarski, M.C., & Mazlan, M. Lancet 2008, 371: 2192–200

34 Study outcomes: HIV risk reduction
Schottenfeld, R.S., Chawarski, M.C., & Mazlan, M. Lancet 2008, 371: 2192–200

35 Seroconversion by treatment participation: retention is critical
1 2 3 4 One or More Less Than One Year Years of Methadone of Methadone Treatment Treatment (Moss et al. 1994)

36 Limitations of treatment studies
Measurement variability Treatment variability Short follow-up Focus on opiate dependent injectors No randomized trials with HIV endpoints

37 If not eligible, referred
HPTN 058 Study Design Short term Suboxone At Bx and 6 months plus one year counseling; Referral to local resources HIV testing and counseling Every 6 months Year 02 Opiate injectors recruited from community and screened 12 month Suboxone plus one year counseling; Referral to local resources HIV testing and counseling Every 6 months Year 02 If not eligible, referred to local resources

38 HIV Infected Population
Durable Viral Suppression Adherence = Start therapy Substance Abuse Engage in medical care Concept slide – serve as the outline of talk In the aqua-marine boxes is the pathway HIV infected patients must follow to reach the ideal endpoint Go through each step Risk factors can act at every step to impede progress What are these risk factors? – Lets start with this first step HIV Infected Population

39 Adherence with antiretroviral therapy is adversely affected by drug use
Not using cocaine (n=57) Using cocaine (n=20) P value Adherence (MEMS Caps) 68% 27% 0.005 Viral suppression 46% 13% Arnsten JH. J Gen Intern med 2002;17:377

40 Adherence to HIV medications by drug use
Lucas et al, 2002

41 Risk of developing new opportunistic infection according to drug use status
Lucas et al. Am J Epidemiol 2006

42 Adherence by past and current drug and alcohol diagnoses
Alcohol Drug Current diagnoses p<.01 p<.01 Lifetime diagnoses NS NS

43 Maximizing the impact of drug abuse treatment as HIV prevention
Accessible Acceptable Affordable

44 Continuum of Drug Use and Treatment
Abuse Dependence Out-patient Detoxification + Residential Agonist/Antagonist Outreach Drug free Out-patient Harm Reduction Antagonist Counseling Counseling Counseling

45 Estimated Opiate dependent Drug Users in Agonist Treatment per 100,000 population

46 HIV prevention and care implications: Necessary but not sufficient
Drug Treatment Community Harm Outreach Reduction HIV Care

47 Conclusions Behavioral and serologic data support the hypotheses that drug users in treatment: significantly reduce the frequency of use practice fewer risk behaviors have greater access to HIV treatment are more adherent to HIV care

48 Conclusions Data suggests effective treatments for drug users:
recognize addiction as a chronic disease (at least one year) use pharmacologic and counseling interventions are accessible, acceptable, and affordable

49 Future directions Expand access to effective treatments
Target drug users earlier in the continuum of use Test interventions for use of multiple substances Measure HIV risk endpoints in clinical trials of new medications Urgent need to sustain search for pharmacologic treatments for stimulant abuse

50 Ignorance Poverty Sexism Access Discrimin- To ation Care Disem-
powered Women Stigma- tization Human Rights Abuses Prejudice Denial High Risk Behavior Complacency Courtesy of Jim Hoxie


Download ppt "Drug Abuse Treatment as HIV Prevention: The State of the Science"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google