Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

INDICATIONS AND TECHNIQUE OF CLOSED REDUCTION TREATMENT

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "INDICATIONS AND TECHNIQUE OF CLOSED REDUCTION TREATMENT"— Presentation transcript:

1 INDICATIONS AND TECHNIQUE OF CLOSED REDUCTION TREATMENT
NORMAN RAMÍREZ MD HOSPITAL DE LA CONCEPCIÓN SAN GERMÁN PUERTO RICO

2 INDICATIONS FAILURE OF SPLINT TREATMENT DISLOCATED HIP PATIENT BETWEEN 6 MONTHS OF AGE TO 2 YEARS OF AGE Closed Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Early-term Results From a Prospective, Multicenter Cohort. Sankar WN, Herrera Soto , et al JPO 2016

3 GOALS OBTAIN GOOD HIP CONTAINMENT MAINTAIN GOOD HIP CONTAINMENT
Closed reduction in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip Cemalettin 2007 Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica

4 TRACTION GOALS: 1: DECREASE AVN INCIDENCE
2: DECREASE OPEN REDUCTION RATE NO INDICATION….. Preliminary traction as a single determinant of avascular necrosis in developmental dislocation of the hip Kutlu JPO 2000 Overhead Bryant's Traction Does Not Improve the Success of Closed Reduction or Limit AVN in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. Sucato D JPO 2017

5 CLOSE REDUCTION

6 TECHNIQUE GENERAL ANESTHESIA HIP FLEXION 90 DEGREES HIP ABDUCTION UNTIL REDUCTION ( ORTOLANI )

7 TECHNIQUE RANGE OF MOTION FROM REDUCTION TO DISLOCATION WATCH SAFE ZONE- RAMSEY IF THE HIP CAN BE ABDUCTED LESS THAN 50 DEGREES OF ABDUCTION AND FLEXION LESS THAN 90 DEGREES WITHOUT REDISLOCATION STABLE REDUCTION

8 IF MORE THAN 15 OF INTERNAL REDUCTION OR WIDE ABDUCTION- UNSTABLE REDUCTION CONSIDER ADDUCTOR TENOTOMY

9

10 AVOID …. FULL ABDUCTION MORE 15 DEGREES OF INT. ROT.
FORCEFUL REDUCTION Risk factors for avascular necrosis after closed reduction for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Schur MD, Arkade A , et al J Child Orthop Jun

11 ARTHROGRAM Intraoperative Arthrogram Predicts Residual Dysplasia after Successful Closed Reduction of DDH. Zhang ZL et al Orthop Surg Aug

12

13 TECHNIQUE…. WIDTH OF THE MEDIAL DYE POOL. 7 mm or LESS
Congenital dislocation of the hip : an evaluation of close reduction. Race et al JPO 1983 MEDILIZATION RATIO Prognostic Factors in congenital dislocation of the hip treated with close reduction Forlin E et al JBJS 1992 LIMBUS SHAPE

14 ROSE THORN SING

15

16

17 AFTER CASTING POST REDUCTION X-RAY

18 SINGLE SHOT COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY
Useful to confirm an adequate reduction. Postoperative computed tomographic evaluation of congenital hip dislocation Toby et al 1987 Computed Tomography for early evaluation for developmental dysplasia of the hip Stanton et al JPO 1992 The predictive value of computed tomography in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip . Mandel D JPO 1998

19

20

21

22 UlTRASOUND Decrease amount of radiation Wide open perineal window
Extended learning curve Ultrasound in the management of the reduction of the femoral head during treatment in a spica cast after reduction of hip dislocation in developmental dysplasia of the hip Florens et al JBJS BR 2003

23 MAGNETIC RESONANCE ACCURATE ASSESMENT OF REDUCTION
EXCELLENT DELINEATION OF SOFT TISSUE FEMORAL HEAD PERFUSSION - GALODINIUM COST $$$$$ Post closed reduction perfusion magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of avascular necrosis in developmental hip dysplasia Tiderius et al JPO 2009 MRI in Postreduction Evaluation of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Our Experience.Dibello D J Pediatr Orthop. 2017

24 POST OP MANAGEMENT 6 WEEKS OF CASTING EVALUATION UNDER ANESTHESIA 6 MORE WEEKS ABDUCTION SPLINT

25 COMPLICATIONS

26 LACK OF REDUCTION Inverted limbus Ligament Teres
Transverse Acetabular ligament Hourglass constriction of the capsule Fibrofatty pulvinar tissue Soft tissue interposition after closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip Hattori JBJS BR 1999

27 OSTEONECROSIS RATE : 6 % TO 48 % RISK FACTORS: 1. TRACTION 2. CLOSE REDUCTION TECHNIQUE 3. HIP SPICA POSISTION 4. ADDUCTOR TENOTOMY 5. OSSIFIC NUCLEUS Avascular necrosis following closed reduction for treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review. Bradley CS et al J Child Orthop. 2016

28

29

30

31 THE PRESENCE THE FEMORAL HEAD OSSIFIC NUCLEUS....
DECREASE THE RISK OF OSTEONECROSIS Avascular necrosis after the treatment of DDH :the protective influence of the ossific nucleus Segal L JPO 1999. The contribution of the ossific nucleus to the structural stiffness of the capital femoral epiphisis : a porcine model for DDH Segal L JPO 1999 The surgical treatment of established congenital dislocation of the hip. Clarke et al JPO 2005

32 THE PRESENCE OF THE FEMORAL HEAD OSSIFIC NUCLEUS...
WAIT UNTIL THE OSSIFIC NUCLEUS INCREASE THE NEED OF FUTURE SURGERY…… The prognostic importance of the ossific nucleus in the treatment of Congenital Dysplasia of the hip. Luhman s, Shoenecker PL et al JBJS 1998 Reduction of a dislocation of the hip due to DDH: implications for the need for future surgery. Luhman S, Schoenecker et al JBJS 2003 Avascular necrosis rate in early reduction after failed Pavlik harness treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Senaran et al JPO 2007

33 The presence of the ossific nucleus did not alter the development of AVN, but has a protective effect against the development of severe AVN The effect of the femoral head ossific nucleus in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip A meta analysis Roposh et al JBJS 2009

34 2017….. The current literature does not support the hypothesis that presence of the ossific nucleus at reduction is associated with lower risk of osteonecrosis. Presence of the Ossific Nucleus and Risk of Osteonecrosis in the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort and Case-Control Studies. Chen C et al J Bone Joint Surg Am May

35 THANKS


Download ppt "INDICATIONS AND TECHNIQUE OF CLOSED REDUCTION TREATMENT"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google