Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Are We Moving Away from Surgery for the Common Femoral Lesion?

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Are We Moving Away from Surgery for the Common Femoral Lesion?"— Presentation transcript:

1 Are We Moving Away from Surgery for the Common Femoral Lesion?
CRT 2012 David H. Deaton, MD Chief, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Georgetown University Hospital MedStar Vascular Washington, DC

2 David H. Deaton, MD Aptus Endosystems Boston Scientific / Trivascular
U.S. Phase I Investigator Advisory Board Consultant Boston Scientific / Trivascular U.S. Phase I Investigator – Trivascular I device Vascutek / Terumo U.S. Phase I Investigator – Anaconda graft Medtronic – Consultant BioConnect – Consultant / Sci. Adv. Board ROX Medical – Consultant / Sci. Adv. Board Intact Vascular – Consultant / Sci. Adv. Board GE Vascular Imaging – Consultant David H. Deaton, MD

3 Principles of CFA reconstruction
Primary inflow to lower extremity Preserve Profunda inflow: “Lifeline of the Leg” Preserve percutanous access via femoral Avoid redo procedures

4 Medicare: Trends in Physician Specialty for Endovascular
National trends in lower extremity bypass surgery, endovascular interventions, and major amputations Corrected Proof, 29 May 2009 
Philip P. Goodney, Adam W. Beck, Jan Nagle, H. Gilbert Welch, Robert W. Zwolak 
Journal of Vascular Surgery 
DOI: /j.jvs

5 Endovascular Treatment of Common Femoral Artery Disease Bonvini RF, Rastan A, Sixt S, et.al.
Retrospective analysis of 360 CFA interventions 26.9% isolated CFA interventions; others combined with inflow / outflow lesions 16.7% were CTO POBA primary; adjunctive stenting 36.9% > 30% stenosis still present in 7.2% Restenosis 27.6% at one year J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011; 58:

6 1 and 5 Year Primary Patency 93% and 91% Secondary patency 100%
65 CFA endarterectomies 68% claud, 32% CLI 1 and 5 Year Primary Patency 93% and 91% Secondary patency 100% 5% Major complication(hematoma, wound infection, failure to treat inflow lesion) J Vasc Surg 2008 Oct;48(4):872-7

7 Factors To Consider in Endoluminal Reconstruction
Pros Easy Short, large diameter vessel Cons May need to stent Jeopardize profunda High recurrence At joint space / easily compressed Complicate future femoral access and surgery

8 Disaster: Loss of Common Femoral and Profunda

9 What is “Common Femoral Endarterectomy”?
Removal of all plaque en bloc from distal external iliac through orifice of profunda and SFA Patch angioplasty (vein or prosthetic) of vertical arteriotomy End result: Large disease free common femoral

10 Factors to Consider in Open Femoral Reconstruction
Pros Easily accessible Excellent acute and long term results Allows maximum control / protection of profunda femoris Facilitates inflow and outflow procedures Maintains endovascular access site for coronary and other peripheral intervention Cons Difficult in reoperative / irradiated fiels

11 Techniques in CFA Endovascular
POBA – risk of needing stent Directional Atherectomy Less risk of stent Can direct therapy at eccentric lesions Rotational atherectomy Stents – undesirable Complicates access Across joint Jeopardizes profunda

12 Current Practice Treat “serious” CFA disease with open endarterectomy and patch Consider endoluminal therapy for small focal lesions complicating distal outflow endovascular interventions Consider endoluminal in surgically inaccessible femoral anatomy

13 Thank you


Download ppt "Are We Moving Away from Surgery for the Common Femoral Lesion?"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google