1. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
A schematic of a photovoltaic CPC. The subscript T denotes truncated dimensions [8].

2. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
A portrayal of how a CPC panel composed of five troughs compares to a conventional flat panel

3. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
A diagram showing how radiation is decreased from what is incident on the aperture of the CPC within the acceptance angle, ICPC, to what passes through to the absorber, SCPC, and finally, to what is actually absorbed by the photovoltaic cells, Sabs

4. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Beam radiation is resolved in to the transverse and longitudinal projections (θt and θl) on the CPC aperture

5. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Electric output per unit area over a year for CPCs and a conventional panel using the Astronergy photovoltaic cells. The CPC geometry varies to incorporate concentration ratios of 2, 5, and 10 and truncation height ratios of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.

6. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Electric output per unit area over a year for CPCs and a conventional panel using the SunPower E20 photovoltaic cells. The CPC geometry is varied to incorporate concentration ratios of 2, 5, and 10 and truncation height ratios of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and1.

7. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Electric output per unit area over a year for CPCs and a conventional panel using the SunPower X21 photovoltaic cells. The CPC geometry is varied to incorporate concentration ratios of 2, 5, and 10 and truncation height ratios of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and1.

8. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Electric output per unit area over a year for CPCs and a conventional panel using the Spectrolab photovoltaic cells. The CPC geometry is varied to incorporate concentration ratios of 2, 5, and 10 and truncation height ratios of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.

9. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The difference in levelized cost of energy between CPCs and a conventional panel using the Astronergy photovoltaic cells. The CPC geometry is varied to incorporate concentration ratios of 2, 5, and 10 and truncation height ratios of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.

10. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The difference in levelized cost of energy between CPCs and a conventional panel using the SunPower E20 photovoltaic cells. The CPC geometry is varied to incorporate concentration ratios of 2, 5, and 10 and truncation height ratios of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.

11. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The difference in levelized cost of energy between CPCs and a conventional panel using the SunPower X21 photovoltaic cells. The CPC geometry is varied to incorporate concentration ratios of 2, 5, and 10 and truncation height ratios of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.

12. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
The difference in levelized cost of energy between CPCs and a conventional panel using the Spectrolab photovoltaic cells. The CPC geometry is varied to incorporate concentration ratios of 2, 5, and 10 and truncation height ratios of 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.

13. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
LCE for the best configured (lowest LCE) CPCs along with the corresponding conventional panels for each type of photovoltaic cell. The bottom portion of the plot is a zoomed in version of the top plot; notice the different y-axes for LCE.

14. Date of download: 11/8/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Computational Study of a Fixed Orientation Photovoltaic Compound Parabolic Concentrator
J. Sol. Energy Eng. 2016;139(2): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Electric output per unit area for the best configured (lowest LCE) CPCs along with the corresponding conventional panels for each type of photovoltaic cell