1. Analysis of three-dimensional knee kinematics during stair descent two decades post- ACL rupture – Data revisited using statistical parametric mapping 
Gisela Sole, Todd Pataky, Eva Tengman, Charlotte Häger 
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 
Volume 32, Pages (February 2017)
DOI: /j.jelekin
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
One-way MANOVA on the data in the figure during stance phase of stair descent. The χ2 trajectory exceeded the threshold for significance over approximately 0–10% of the stance phase, implying differences amongst the three groups. The p value indicates the probability with which Gaussian random fields, with the identical smoothness as the model residuals, would produce a supra-threshold cluster of the same temporal extent.
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology  , 44-50DOI: ( /j.jelekin )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Post hoc analyses of the results in the figure during stance phase of stair descent: two-sample Hotelling’s T2 tests on group pairs. Non-surgery: ACLPT group; Surgery: ACLR group.
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology  , 44-50DOI: ( /j.jelekin )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Post hoc analyses of the results in the figure, comparing the ACLPT group to the controls for (a) flexion/extension, (b) adduction/abduction, and (c) internal/external rotation during the stance phase of stair descent.
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology  , 44-50DOI: ( /j.jelekin )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
Mean planar trajectories and standard deviation clouds for the Control and ACLPT (Non-surgery) groups during the stance phase of stair descent, as an exploration of the figure results. Positive values indicate (a) flexion, (b) adduction and (c) internal rotation respectively.
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology  , 44-50DOI: ( /j.jelekin )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

6. Fig. 5
Within-subject mean differences and SD cloud for the injured versus uninjured side trajectories for the ACLPT (non-surgery) and ACLR (surgery) groups during the stance phase of stair descent.
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology  , 44-50DOI: ( /j.jelekin )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

7. Fig. 6
Main two-sample Hotelling’s T2 test comparing the trajectories of the injured versus uninjured sides of the ACLPT (non-surgery) and ACLR (surgery) groups during the stance phase of stair descent.
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology  , 44-50DOI: ( /j.jelekin )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions