Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byCaroline Shaw Modified over 6 years ago
1
FAMILY EMPLOYMENT AWARENESS TRAINING (FEAT) FEAT Format and Content
Assessing the effectiveness of Family Employment Awareness Training (FEAT): A quasi-experimental, mixed-methods study & Grace L. Francis, PhD George Mason University Judith M.S. Gross, PhD University of Kansas FINDINGS FAMILY EMPLOYMENT AWARENESS TRAINING (FEAT) RESEARCH STUDY Constructs Measured FEAT is a knowledge-based training program designed to increase expectations for competitive employment and knowledge of employment-related services and supports among people with disabilities, families, and professionals. NIDILRR Award In 2013, we received a NIDILRR-Field Initiated research grant award (DED /NIH ) to conduct a quasi-experimental, mixed-methods assessment of the impact of FEAT to determine its effectiveness in changing perceptions and promoting competitive employment. Participants Recruitment Surveys: Recruited directly through schools, indirectly through the local Parent Training and Information (PTI) Center, and as attending participants at FEAT trainings. Interviews: Pre-survey completers were asked on the survey if they were interested in volunteering for interviews. Interviewees were selected from this sample. Sample Only family survey data was used in this analysis. Matched samples of attendees and non-attendees were analyzed, and previous FEAT attendees were removed from analysis. Quasi-experimental Design Surveys: Community Employment Survey was sent via schools to all transition-age young adults in the region 1-2 months prior to bringing a FEAT training to the region. Interviews: Interviews were conducted with 12 Hispanic families from rural Kansas – 8 attendees and 4 non-attendees 1. Expectations a. Six-question scale assessing attitudes for competitive employment for individuals with disabilities b. Four-question section assessing attitudes for competitive employment for individuals requiring various levels of on-the-job support 2. Knowledge Six-question scale assessing perception of knowledge about employment resources 3. Employment a. Checklist of employment development activities b. Checklist of employment outcomes 4. Barriers Checklist of barriers believed to impact employment 5. Resources Accessed and Used Checklist of local and federal employment resources 6. Perceptions of FEAT Ten Likert scale questions assessing participants perceptions of FEAT on their expectations, knowledge, resource use, employment, and barriers Data Analyses For this poster presentation, we are only reporting on the survey data analyses related to the employment related constructs measured and participants’ perceptions of FEAT. Mann-Whitney test Analyze employment resources used ANCOVA – repeated measures Analyze Expectations and Knowledge Scales Chi-squared Employment outcomes Frequencies Analyze barriers, resources, perceptions of FEAT Expectations and Knowledge Short-term One-year Expectations p= .0022 p= Knowledge p= <.0001 FEAT Format and Content FEAT is a two-part training program that takes place over 2 days and includes lecture, action-orientated activities, breakout sessions for the young adults with disabilities, and afternoon breakout sessions with local entrepreneurs, employers, employees with disabilities, and service providers who present information to and dialogue with participants. FEAT training topics are diverse, covering extensive information (see table below). One-Year Employment Outcomes No significant difference between attendees and non-attendees. DISCUSSION Top 5 Resources Accessed/Used at One-year Expectations for employment improved significantly in the short-term; though they did not maintain that significance at the 1-year mark. Improvements in knowledge are always significant and sustained over time. Perceptions of barriers Attendees – half are systemic and half are person-specific Non-attendees – all but one are person-specific Employment outcomes Limited sample size in 1-year analysis Age of child in 1-year sample: 17 out of 19 attendees were <22 yrs. 23 out of 25 non-attendees were <22 yrs. Short-term Perceptions of FEAT Overall, positive perceptions Professional data (34/65 total attendee surveys) not yet analyzed Repeat FEAT attendees (12/31 total family attendee surveys) data not yet analyzed FEAT Attendees Non-attendees Case Manager (31.6%) Case Manager (44%) Community Developmental Disability Organization (31.6%) Community Developmental Disability Organization (36%) Vocational Rehabilitation (31.6%) None (24%) Benefits Specialist (20%) Vocational Rehabilitation (20%) Kansas Workforce Centers (20%) Topics Sub-topics Supported and customized competitive employment options Carved jobs Created jobs Resource ownership Self-employment Business within a business Employer-initiated models Family role in supporting employment Building a support network Contributing to the employment process Creating parent-professional partnerships Transition to adulthood Healthcare Work Post-secondary Education Support resources Employee resources - assistive technology, natural supports, job coaches, benefits specialist Employer resources - local and national organizations providing services and supports to employers of persons with disabilities Employment services and supports Vocational Rehabilitation (VR) Ticket to Work Career one-stop/Workforce centers Kansas Medicaid (i.e., waivers and buy-in programs) Community rehabilitation providers Transportation Work incentives (e.g., PASS, IRWE, 1619b) Funding and information Kansas Council on Developmental Disabilities Small Business Administration (i.e., development centers, SCORE, women’s business centers) CASH Program (Individual Development Account) Kansas Disability Service Maps ABLE Act Antidiscrimination policy Federal (i.e., Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 504) State (i.e., Employment First policy, Kansas Act Against Discrimination) Top 5 Barriers Perceived/Experienced at One-year FEAT Attendees Non-attendees Severity of disability or intensity of needs (47.4%) Severity of disability or intensity of needs (56%) Limited funding for employment services (42.1%) Poor social skills (44%) Lack of supported employment service providers and job coaches (42.1%) Need for extensive or ongoing supports at work (44%) Poor social skills (31.6%) Lack of employer flexibility (28%) Poor collaboration among schools, professionals, and families (31.6%) Lack of education, training, or work experience (28%) Need for extensive or ongoing supports at work (31.6%) -- Data Collection We used the Community Employment Survey (Francis & Gross, 2012) to assess the expectations, knowledge, employment outcomes, barriers experienced, resources accessed/used, and perceptions of FEAT (attendees only) of both FEAT attendees and non-attendees across Kansas. We conducted interviews at three points in time, interviewing 12 Hispanic families at 6 months after the pre-survey, 7 of those families again at 12 months after the pre-survey, and 4 of those same families again at 18 months after the pre-survey. Short-term Perceptions of FEAT FEAT positively influenced /improved . . . Agreed Strongly agreed … my expectations for the employment of individuals with disabilities 46.1% 34.3% … my accessing more resources 38.2% 16.7% ... my knowledge about employment resources 40.2% 52% … the way I seek out and use employment resources 54.4% 24.3% …my feeling that I can overcome barriers 50% 21.4% … the way I address barriers to employment for individuals with disabilities 59.6% 27.3% FEAT attendees Non-attendees Surveyed prior to training attendance Surveyed at same point as attendees – pre Surveyed up to one month following attendance Surveyed 12 months following attendance Surveyed 12 months post FEAT attendees Non-attendees Surveyed prior to training attendance Surveyed at same point as attendees Surveyed one month following FEAT attendance Surveyed 12 months following pre-survey completion CONTACT INFORMATION Grace L. Francis Judith M.S. Gross
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.