Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMarianna Tyler Modified over 6 years ago
1
Bigyani Das and Phil Durbin Adnet Systems Inc./GSFC
Comparison of Column Ozone from OMI with Ground-based Measurements at Three USA Sites Bigyani Das and Phil Durbin Adnet Systems Inc./GSFC OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
2
OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
Overview Question: How do OMI ozone column data compare with ground-based instruments? Answer: OMI data does compare well Method: 3 USA Sites – Houston, Bondville, Raleigh Ground-based Instruments USDA (UV network) NOAA-EPA (NewBrew) Results: Daily Column Ozone, Monthly Averages, Bias – All Sky Conditions, Year 2007 (All), (Bondville & Raleigh versus USDA) Average Bias (%) Table for [ Bias =1/n ∑(OMI-GB)/GB * 100 ] USDA-TOMS USDA-DOAS NewBrew-TOMS NewBrew-DOAS Houston 3.49 3.45 -1.06 -1.03 Bondville 0.31 0.93 0.62 1.27 Raleigh 4.0 4.18 -4.38 -4.20 OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
3
Ground Based Instruments
USDA UV-B Monitoring and Research Program (UV-MFRSR) – Ultraviolet Multifilter Rotating Shadow-band Radiometer NewBrew - NOAA-EPA Brewer UV and Ozone network (Brewer MkIV Spectrophotometer) Measurement Sites Houston, TX (Lat: N, Lon: W) Bondville, IL (Lat: N, Lon: W) Raleigh, NC (Lat: N, Lon: W) OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
4
Houston – Lat: 29.718(N), Lon: 95.341(W)
OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
5
Bondville, IL – Lat: 40.053 (N), Lon: 88.372(W)
OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
6
Raleigh, NC - Lat: 35.728(N), Lon: 78.68(W)
OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
7
OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
Bias Comparison OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
8
OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
Bias Comparison: OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
9
OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
Summary Daily Column Ozone values show good agreement with ground-based measurements The bias values are site dependent Maximum bias and average bias have different characteristics. Maximum bias is less with NewBrew data than USDA data at all 3 sites. Maximum bias is more at Bondville and Houston than Raleigh when compared with USDA– Reason ? OMI Science Team Meeting, Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.