Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Jamming at High Densities

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Jamming at High Densities"— Presentation transcript:

1 Jamming at High Densities
Ning Xu Department of Physics & CAS Key Laboratory of Soft Matter Chemistry University of Science and Technology of China Hefei, Anhui , P. R. China Point J (c) unjammed jammed Volume fraction marginally jammed pressure, shear modulus = 0 pressure, shear modulus > 0 Will well-known properties of marginally jammed solids hold at high densities?

2 Simulation Model Cubic box with periodic boundary conditions
N/2 big and N/2 small frictionless spheres with mass m L / S = 1.4  avoid crystallization Purely repulsive interactions Harmonic: =2; Hertzian: =5/2 L-BFGS energy minimization (T = 0); constant pressure ensemble Molecular dynamics simulation at constant NPT (T > 0)

3 Would it cause any new physics?
Potential Field Low volume fraction High volume fraction potential increases Interaction field on a slice of 3D packings of spheres At high volume fractions, interactions merge largely and inhomogeneously Would it cause any new physics?

4 Critical Scalings A crossover divides jamming into two regimes d
C. Zhao, K. Tian, and N. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, (2011).

5 Critical Scalings Marginal jamming Potential Pressure Bulk modulus
Marginally Jammed d Marginal jamming Potential Pressure Bulk modulus Shear modulus Coordination number zC=2d, isostatic value Scalings rely on potential C. S. O’Hern et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, (2002); Phys. Rev. E 68, (2003). C. Zhao, K. Tian, and N. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, (2011).

6 Critical Scalings Deep jamming Potential Pressure Bulk modulus
Marginally Jammed Deeply Jammed d Deep jamming Potential Pressure Bulk modulus Shear modulus Coordination number Scalings do not rely on potential C. Zhao, K. Tian, and N. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, (2011).

7 Structure  Pair Distribution Function g(r)
What we have known for marginally jammed solids? g1max  - c g1max First peak of g(r) diverges at Point J Second peak splits g(r) discontinuous at r = L, g(L+) < g(L) L. E. Silbert, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. E 73, (2006).

8 Structure  Pair Distribution Function g(r)
What are new for deeply jammed solids? d Second peak emerges below r = L First peak stops decay with increasing volume fraction g(L+) reaches minimum approximately at d C. Zhao, K. Tian, and N. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, (2011).

9 Vibrational Properties  Density of States
 increases marginal deep d Plateau in density of states (DOS) for marginally jammed solids No Debye behavior, D() ~  d1, at low frequency If fitting low frequency part of DOS by D() ~ ,  reaches maximum at d Double peak structure in DOS for deeply jammed solids Maximum frequency increases with volume fraction for deeply jammed solids (harmonic interaction)  change of effective interaction L. E. Silbert, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, (2005). C. Zhao, K. Tian, and N. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, (2011).

10 Vibrational Properties  Quasi-localization
d Participation ratio Define Low frequency modes are quasi-localized Localization at low frequency is the least at d High frequency modes are less localized for deeply jammed solids C. Zhao, K. Tian, and N. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, (2011). N. Xu, V. Vitelli, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Europhys. Lett. 90, (2010).

11 What we learned from jamming at T = 0?
A crossover at d separates deep jamming from marginal jamming Many changes concur at d States at d have least localized low frequency modes Implication: States at d are most stable, i.e. low frequency modes there have highest energy barrier Vmax Glass transition temperature may be maximal at d? N. Xu, V. Vitelli, A. J. Liu, and S. R. Nagel, Europhys. Lett. 90, (2010).

12 Glass Transition and Glass Fragility
Vogel-Fulcher d d Glass transition temperature and glass fragility index both reach maximum at d L. Berthier, A. J. Moreno, and G. Szamel, Phys. Rev. E 82, (R) (2010). L. Wang and N. Xu, to be submitted (2011).

13 Dynamical Heterogeneity
At constant temperature above glass transition, dynamical heterogeneity reaches maximum at d  Deep jamming at high density weakens dynamical heterogeneity L. Wang and N. Xu, to be submitted (2011).

14 Conclusions Acknowledgement
Critical scalings, structure, vibrational properties, and dynamics undergo apparent changes at a crossover volume fraction d which thus separates marginal jamming from deep jamming Is the crossover critical? Experimental realizations: charged colloids, star polymers Acknowledgement Cang Zhao USTC Lijin Wang USTC Kaiwen Tian will be at UPenn Brought to you by National Natural Science Foundation of China No

15 Thanks for your attention
& Welcome to visit USTC


Download ppt "Jamming at High Densities"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google