Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1 Flow chart showing the selection of publications identified in the literature search. From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF:

Published byRuth Carson Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1 Flow chart showing the selection of publications identified in the literature search. From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1 Flow chart showing the selection of publications identified in the literature search.
From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(5): doi: /humupd/dmx017 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

2 Figure 3 Ongoing pregnancy rate per patient population.
From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(5): doi: /humupd/dmx017 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

3 Figure 2 Funnel plot of publications that reported ongoing pregnancy rate.
From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(5): doi: /humupd/dmx017 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

4 Figure 4 Ongoing pregnancy rate per antagonist per flexible or fixed protocol with or without oral hormonal programming (OHP) in a general IVF population. From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(5): doi: /humupd/dmx017 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

5 Figure 5 Clinical pregnancy rate per patient population.
From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(5): doi: /humupd/dmx017 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

6 Figure 6 Number of oocytes retrieved per patient population.
From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(5): doi: /humupd/dmx017 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

7 Figure 7 Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate per patient population.
From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(5): doi: /humupd/dmx017 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

8 Figure 8 Live birth rates per patient population.
From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(5): doi: /humupd/dmx017 Hum Reprod Update | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please

Download ppt "Figure 1 Flow chart showing the selection of publications identified in the literature search. From: GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF:"

Similar presentations

From: An open day in the metric space

From: An open day in the metric space
Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.

Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.
Figure 1 WBC count (A), platelet count (B), MPV (C), platelet activation rate (D) and TGF-β1concentration (E) in the PF of women with endometriosis and.

Figure 1 WBC count (A), platelet count (B), MPV (C), platelet activation rate (D) and TGF-β1concentration (E) in the PF of women with endometriosis and.
The effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis 

The effectiveness of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis 
Fig. 1 Flow chart of the COBRA-light trial and its extension study

Fig. 1 Flow chart of the COBRA-light trial and its extension study
From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.
Figure 2. Quality of life (QOL) scores for functional scale items

Figure 2. Quality of life (QOL) scores for functional scale items
Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Fig. 1 Graphical representation
Figure 3. Day 2 cell symmetry

Figure 3. Day 2 cell symmetry
Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.
Fig. 3 Evolutionary game types as a function of relatedness and synergy where each plot is a different social group size. The payoffs used to generate.

Fig. 3 Evolutionary game types as a function of relatedness and synergy where each plot is a different social group size. The payoffs used to generate.
Figure 1 Cumulative chance of pregnancy according to age at initiation of pregnancy seeking. The curves were drawn based on the following assumptions:

Figure 1 Cumulative chance of pregnancy according to age at initiation of pregnancy seeking. The curves were drawn based on the following assumptions:
Source:Ellerman, Convery, and de Perthuis (2010). Figure 6. 2, p

Source:Ellerman, Convery, and de Perthuis (2010). Figure 6. 2, p
pSS: primary SS; Scl: scleroderma.

pSS: primary SS; Scl: scleroderma.
Figure 1. Selection of papers.

Figure 1. Selection of papers.
Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection

Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection
Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.

Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.
Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser

Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser
Fig. 1 Flow of ascertainment of cases with incident childhood IgA vasculitis reported by four sources From: Incidence of IgA vasculitis in children estimated.

Fig. 1 Flow of ascertainment of cases with incident childhood IgA vasculitis reported by four sources From: Incidence of IgA vasculitis in children estimated.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google