Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySheila Baldwin Modified over 6 years ago
1
Mackenzie Taylor (Mentor) , Mayumi, McKenzie, Ashlee, Justin
The Effects Of Ammonia On the Development Of a Spore Mackenzie Taylor (Mentor) , Mayumi, McKenzie, Ashlee, Justin Introduction: The normal fern gametophyte development takes between days. Spore germination begins three to four days after spores are sown, and should be complete six days after spores are sown. The male and female gametophytes should be sexually mature about ten to twelve days after seeds are sown. We decided to test water pollution, because it is fairly common on Earth today. Since we were not able to use oil, we decided to use ammonia because it is a fairly common water pollutant. Our question was; “Does the concentration of pollution in water/agar affect the growth of c-fern spores?” Our hypothesis was; “If the spores are exposed to ammonia, then the developmental rate of the spores will be slowed down.” Control A Control B Procedures: Pour the agar into the plates. X6 Pour 1/4mL of ammonia into two of the plates. Pour 1/2mL of ammonia into two other plates. Do not pour any ammonia in the last two plates. Place two drops of spores into each container. Place all six plates into bag with wet paper towel. Seal bag shut. Place under light and check growth regularly, noting any differences. Materials: ½ B ½ A -Microscope -Plates -Agar -C-Fern Spores -Rubbing Alcohol -Pipettes -Ammonia -Gloves Conclusion: Our control A, seemed to have increased development in the early stages, but ended on schedule. Control B, also showed the same development. Our ½ A was slow throughout the entire experiment, and has still not even gotten to the third stage of development, which is archegonia. ½ B was also slow, but just managed to get to the third stage of development. ¼ A progressed at a slower rate than the control, but also faster than ½. They managed to get all the way to the archegonia stage, but never managed to get sporophytes. This is true for both A and B. Our hypothesis was supported. Our data shows this because the control finished on time with sporophytes by the end, with the ¼ following behind it reaching the archegonia stage, while the ½ developed the least by only getting to the mitten and rhizoids stage (Table A). Sexual differential was seen in all however. The main error experienced was the contamination infecting not just one control, but both of them. This error was seen as insignificant as we followed it throughout the experiment and compared it to other groups’ controls. If we were to do this experiment again, we would make sure to be more careful so that the plates do not get contaminated, by taking more time and follow instructions more carefully, so that our results would be more accurate. ¼ B ¼ A Table A: Effects of Water Pollution Tempature Control A 1/2 1/4 3/30/11 27 Spores 4/1/11 26 Infection Seen No change just spores 4/6/11 31 Mitten 4/8/11 Multiple Mittens Ryzoids appear Ryzoids 4/11/11 Arcadonia Ryzoids and Mitten Ryzoids and Mittens 4/13/11 Arcadonia, Water was added. No changes, added water. Arcadonia, Water added. 4/15/11 Sporophytes Sexual Differention seen No change
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.