Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byKerry Willis Modified over 6 years ago
1
Impedance Spectroscopy: Can it be used to probe Radiation Damage
Impedance Spectroscopy: Can it be used to probe Radiation Damage? Richard Veazey Supervisors: Prof Derek Sinclair Dr Julian Dean Dr Amy Gandy Prof Simon Pimblott (Uni of Manchester) Department of Materials Science & Engineering, The University of Sheffield Joint ICTP/IAEA Workshop on Radiation Effects in Nuclear Waste Forms and their Consequences for Storage and Disposal Trieste, Italy, Thursday 15th September 2016
2
What is Pyrochlore? General formula - A2B2O7 A = 2+/3+, B = 5+/4+
2x2x2 superstructure of Fluorite (AO2) All atoms reside on specific positions 2 Cation sites 3 Anion sites Anion vacancy - 8a Oxygen positional parameter x48f defines the relaxation from ideality Lattice parameter ~ 10Å, ap=2af A-cation B-cation Oxygen Oxygen vacancy
3
Fluorite – Pyrochlore differences
AO2 Fluorite Disordered A2B2O7Vo Pyrochlore Ordered
4
Why Radiation damage in Pyrochlore?
Novel Fuel types Candidate matrices for the immobilisation of Nuclear Waste Ca0.89Gd0.22Hf0.23U0.44Pu0.22Ti2O7 A2 B2O7 Model Systems Develop an understanding of how ceramics behave in radiation environments. How does the composition and structure effect the response to radiation damage? Pyrochlore structure – variety of compositions, little change in structure. Image Credit: NRC
5
Standard techniques to characterise damage
GAXRD Raman Peaks/ Spots from the crystaline phase decrease in intensity. Diffuse scattering. Structural properties TEM Impedance Spectroscopy?!?!? Electrical properties Electrical properties more sensitive to defects – Easier to see changes in a material as a result of damage Time dependence of recovery Expensive and hard Tedious sample prep Li, Y., 274, , Park, S., 93, 1-11, Lian, J., 51, , 2003.
6
What is Impedance Spectroscopy?
Simple technique for measuring the electrical properties of materials. Powerful technique as it is possible to separate contributions from electrically distinct regions, typically the bulk and grain boundaries. Electrodes (Au or Pt) fired onto sample. An alternating voltage is passed through the sample. Measure current which can be separated into in-phase and out-of-phase components – Complex impedance. Measurement is repeated over a range of frequencies (Hz – MHz). Formalisms Z* - Impedance M* - Electric modulus Y* - Admittance ε* - Permittivity Kidner, N.,91, 6, 1733, 2008
7
Impedance Data Equivalent circuit – best represents the data
Individual components Z” ∝ R – highlights large resistances M” ∝ 1/C – highlights small capacitances Sinclair, D.C., 66, , 1989 Li, M.., 13, 31-35, 2014
8
Experimental Solid state synthesis Characterisation Irradiation
X-ray Diffraction Raman spectroscopy Transmission electron microscopy Scanning electron microscopy Impedance spectroscopy Irradiation Ion implantation
9
Y2B2O7 (B= Ti and Zr) Synthesis
Stoichiometric amounts of Y2O3, ZrO2 and TiO2 Composition Method YTO-1 Uniaxial press, heated at 1500 °C in air for 8 hrs YTO-2 Uniaxial press, CIP, heated at 1675 °C in air for 8 hrs YTO-3 PVA, Unaxial press, CIP, heated at 1675 °C in air for 8 hrs YZO-1 YZO-2 Uniaxial press, CIP, heated at 1750 °C in air for 8 hrs YZO-3 SPS at 1500 °C and 50 MPa for 20 mins CIP – Cold Isostatic Press PVA – Polyvinyl alcohol ground into powder prior to pressing SPS – Spark Plasma Sintering Mill in IPA and milling media Dry and sieve the powder Zr only Heat in Furnace – 1500°C for 8 hours Pyrochlore Fluorite Composition ρGeom (g cm-3) | % ρTh ρArch (g cm-3) | % ρTh YTO-1 4.20 | 84.7 4.46 | 89.8 YTO-2 4.70 | 94.7 4.72 | 95.0 YTO-3 4.52 | 91.2 4.73 | 95.2 YZO-1 4.43 | 79.9 5.23 | 94.3 YZO-2 4.67 | 84.3 5.24 | 94.5 YZO-3 4.85 | 87.5 5.37 | 96.9
10
Y2B2O7 (B= Ti and Zr) SEM 1500°C 1675°C 1675°C
Porosity low – density measurements reasonable 1675°C 1750°C 1500°C SPS Porosity high – density measurements unreasonable
11
Importance of dense ceramics
Damage typically 1 μm deep – large pores can have large effects. Characterisation techniques are surface sensitive – homogeneous damaged region required. Porosity has significant effects on Impedance data. Constriction Resistance Dense ideal arc Porous elongated arc Credit: Lena Sjögren Current takes longer path length to get around the pores
12
Modelling Impedance Spectroscopy Macroscopic contacts Local micro-contacts
13
Model Setup Model drawn using CAD Ra Ca Rb Cb Material a – Amorphous
σa = 1 μS/m εr,a = 1000 Material b - Bulk crystalline σb = 100 μS/m εr,b = 1000 Current flow homogeneous
14
Macroscopic Contacts Model solved using ElCer. Dean, J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 97, 3, σa = 1 μS/m εr,a = εr,b = 1000 Amorphous response Amorphous response Bulk response Rt Ca Ct σb = 100 μS/m Bulk response
15
Macroscopic Contacts Model solved using ElCer. Dean, J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 97, 3, ωRC=1 σa = 1 μS/m σb = 100 μS/m
16
Macroscopic Contacts Amorphous Bulk Bulk Generated using SRIM Amorphous Unless amorphous region is very resistive, signal will be very small. Need a method to achieve a greater signal from amorphous region with as little from the bulk as possible. Microcontacts…
17
Local Microcontacts Bulk GB By picking certain electrodes, can fine tune the experiment to detect the response from certain components. Bulk Fleig,J.App.Phys.,87,5,2000
18
Local Microcontacts ?? Variables Erad, Esep R1 C1 Bulk crystalline
σb = 100 μS/m εr,b = 1000 ?? Current flow heterogeneous
19
Local Microcontacts 90%
20
Local Microcontacts Macroscopic contacts
Current penetrates further into the material with increasing Esep. Current flow through material in this setup not understood. How does electrode geometry impact the impedance response? Once understood, increase the complexity of the model by introducing amorphous region. Can control how deep into the material we probe! (Am-2)
21
Conclusions Yet to acquire correct density for YZO samples.
SPS heat treatments planned. Density important because of surface sensitive characterisation techniques and impedance. Microcontact impedance planned. Impedance with macroscopic contacts unlikely to probe radiation damage. Local microcontacts identified to achieve a greater signal from damaged region. Initial results of Impedance with mirocontacts are promising. Current density max at surface and drops rapidly with depth. At closest separation, 90% of current density passes through a region 2.1 μm from surface. Impedance Spectroscopy: Can it be used to probe Radiation Damage? Preliminary results from the modelling suggest it can! But, further modelling is vital to be able to interpret the data and understand the response that is obtained from experimental work.
22
Thanks for Listening! Any Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.