Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Helena Tang Lead Evaluation Officer September 2008

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Helena Tang Lead Evaluation Officer September 2008"— Presentation transcript:

1 Helena Tang Lead Evaluation Officer September 2008
Using Knowledge to Improve Development Effectiveness: An Evaluation of World Bank Economic and Sector Work and Technical Assistance, Helena Tang Lead Evaluation Officer September 2008

2 Why did we evaluate ESW and TA?
The Bank considers knowledge important for development ESW and TA are the Bank’s main knowledge products Knowledge: long-standing agenda for the Bank “Global knowledge bank” (1996) One of 6 strategic pillars going forward First comprehensive evaluation of these products Inform Bank’s future strategy on knowledge and learning

3 What are ESW and TA? ESW Economic reports (53 types)
Inform Bank activities (strategy and lending) Influence client’s policies and/or programs TA Technical Advice Implement reforms and strengthen institutions (drafting legislation, training in data analysis, knowledge sharing, etc.)

4 85 percent of AAA, FY00-06

5 One-quarter of spending on country services, FY00-06

6 What questions did we ask?
To what extent did ESW and TA meet their objectives? To what extent did the following affect the achievement of ESW and TA objectives? Origination (client-requested or not) Partnership in production with local institutions (government or others) Technical quality Dissemination

7 What evaluation tools did we use?
Five Sets of Evidence 12 Country Reviews

8 Country Review Selection
Serbia Romania Jordan Bangladesh Mali Guyana Vietnam Malaysia Democratic Republic of Congo Peru Mauritius Lesotho

9 What evaluation tools did we use?
Five Sets of Evidence 12 Country Reviews Electronic Surveys of in-country stakeholders Specific ESW Specific TA General Electronic Surveys of all ESW and TA TTLs Electronic Survey of loan TTLs Statistical and econometric analysis

10 MAIN FINDINGS

11 Client views on ESW and TA
Clients find Bank ESW and TA more useful than those provided by other institutions Clients value Bank ESW and TA for their high quality, objectivity, and provision of international perspectives Clients generally prefer TA over ESW (IBRD & IDA) Middle income country (MIC) clients prefer TA and ESW over lending Some MIC clients clearly prefer de-linking TA and ESW from lending

12 Client country respondents had a range of views on the effectiveness of ESW and TA
At least two-thirds gave an above average rating

13 Examples of effective ESW: Vietnam PER
Budget legislation MTEF Capacity

14 Examples of effective ESW: ICAs
Privatization (Serbia) Competitiveness strategy (Guyana) Labor law, property registration, deregulation of public service delivery (Malaysia)

15 Example of effective TA: Mauritius Aid for Trade
Just-in-time advice on trade reform program Analysis of reform scenarios and effects Recommendations incorporated in government reform program

16 ESW improved Bank activities
Shaped country assistance strategies Improved lending quality Presence of relevant ESW associated with better loan quality at entry Around 90 percent of DPL but only around 60 percent of investment loans

17 What made ESW and TA effective?
Technical Quality Good quality ESW requires resources ESW better resourced in IBRD than in IDA countries Bank budget and not trust-fund matters Origination Client interest and buy-in essential but products can be originated by the Bank

18 What made ESW and TA effective?
Partnership Close collaboration with clients throughout the process but not necessarily co-production Collaboration takes time (completion of forest sector review in DRC delayed nearly 2 years) Dissemination Sustained engagement beyond one-off dissemination Broad vs targeted Language and translation

19 What made ESW and TA effective?
Government capacity Lower in post-conflict and some low income countries (DRC, Lesotho) Lower in countries with high turnover of senior government officials (Jordan, Serbia, and in the sector ministries in Peru)

20 RECOMMENDATIONS

21 Recommendation #1 Reinvigorate the mandate (underpinned FY99 ESW reforms) of a strong knowledge base on countries where Bank is providing (planning to provide) funds

22 Recommendation #2 For IDA countries, ensure ESW is adequately resourced, even if it means fewer ESW in some countries

23 Recommendation #3 Enhance institutional arrangements: substantive task team presence in country offices, and include a clear strategy for sustained post-delivery engagement

24 Recommendation #4 Tell Us What You Think Feedback
Recognize and build on client feedback to help counter-balance current Bank incentives for lending over non-lending, and ESW over TA Tell Us What You Think Feedback

25 Recommendation #5 Take results tracking framework more seriously, including systematizing client-feedback


Download ppt "Helena Tang Lead Evaluation Officer September 2008"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google